Did this BIG T.TTY MILF groom a young breh??

[MajesticLion]

Water in a plastic bag.

- © Strife1

 

[Still Benefited]

This is just dumb logic

Because men who are found to be physically attractive by women in general can use that to prey on young girls and younger women.

A woman preying on young boys is no different than a man preying on young girls. Often times predators go after vulnerable children, teens and young adults who lack parental supervision and strong guardians and protectors.

There was a black male YouTuber who made a video on having sex with teenage white girls who spoke on this. Said girls with good relationships with their parents were more difficult to persuade and get access to.

Predatory behavior is predatory regardless. You know how many stories I’ve heard from girl friends of their female friends getting them drunk so they can sexually assault them? Had one female friend who woke up to her “friend” going down on her.

It doesnt matter how attractivel the man is. The potential manipulation factor due to advanced mouthpiece is what makes the young girl a victim. If a young girl was just attracted to an older guy and wanted to sleep with him,I wouldnt put her in the "victim" category based on the act. But she would become a victim over time due to manipulation factor within the relationship. I consider victims to be girls who are preyed upon like you said. By older men using advanced mouthpiece,preying on young girls insecurities etc. You cant put every young girl in that category. Because some like older men,and will even lie about their age to get one. Is she a victim still?

I just dont see a older woman being able to talk her way into sex . So that takes away the manipulation factor.Even if the young man is only 15-16. In fact in most of the cases ive seen with teachers. The young dudes are talking the teachers into sex with underdeveloped mouthpiece

Men are simply smarter in areas of psychological manipulation. Women get us to have sex with them by playing on our horniness and attraction to them. There is only an age where that begins(puberty) and an age where it stops(death)

 

[Still Benefited]

I could be wrong by the way. Maybe you all have experienced or heard stories here where women talked men or young men into sex. That he wouldnt have had without her spitting game.I struggle to think of a time ive experienced or heard of another man tell me of an experience like that

 

[xCivicx]

I knew this would make it here

 

[Silver Surfer]

She just a goofy old thot

 

[Guvnor]

She is wrong, trifling and basically announcing why she isn't shyt and shouldn't be wifed but what she didn't wasn't illegal. Even if she made this story up she is a trifling thot who thinks this is cute.

However she did wait till he was 25 lol.

 

[FeverPitch2]

Can you imagine telling a 15 yr old bytch in a prom dress, “damn you look good call me in 10 years”

/thread

 

[Still Benefited]

Apologies, I didn't mean to come off as rude but I'm still waiting for this idiot to reply to my hypothetical above, most people can't answer the "why" of that question. Also, I don't agree with your position as its arbitrary on the basis of nothing objective. My position on raising the the age of consent is inline with what we can observe as a objective property of the human mind, and that is the development of the section of the brain that is related to reasoning. And there are definitely observable differences between a 15 year old and a 18 year old both physically and mentally, we can observe the difference in brain matter (white/gray) and something as simple as plates fusing occurs over time. I think you are getting at the face value appearance, but that is left to the subjective for the most part. I'm sticking to what is objective to fortify the justification of increasing the legal age as opposed to an age that I feel is adulthood. We are on the same page, but I want a stronger argument for the position, thus the basis of objective properties.

edit: I'm pretty sure that p*ssy just got off, that's why I don't engage with idiots, they always act in bad faith even if they don't realize it. Anyways, I couldn't put it in the rep comment but people acting in bad faith do enrage me, I won't lie. When you responded I thought you were strawmanning my position as I already outlined why something like physical attraction was irrelevant in the matter, a matter which was based on moral implications. That is why I asked him the hypothetical above. Because I can answer the "why" of why I wouldn't engage in that activity, I wanted his answer as it would reveal his earlier reasoning. He just keep appealing to nature fallacy earlier.





For this, it's the same way men coerce boys into sexual activity, through power dynamics. Point is, even in a situation where the boy is entirely influenced by "horniness", they don't fully understand the implications of sexual activity, the adult is more capable of understanding and that is where the fault in morality lies. They are exploiting an underdeveloped mind. And I already mentioned I have been engaged with older women that perused me in a sexual manner when I was a minor, I'm years removed from that and it still bothers me to this day. So it's not really something that boys seek because they don't fully grasp what is happening.

No problem champ

I think a 15 year old and 18 year old can look the same physically though. Of course it doesnt always work that way. Some girls looked different by their senior year,but many didnt noticably. And its probably even a thinner margin these days where young teens arent required to dress young.

Luckily im older and dont have to worry about confusing them. In my early to mid 20's I had a harder time differentiating. But im so far removed from youth now at 36,I can easily tell when a girl falls in the "kid" bracket. Might be 16,might be 21 but they are in the same category.

Good point on the last paragraph. I dont really see it with the power dynamics. But you are right about a young man not fully understanding the implications I suppose. Maybe my views on men and womens intelligence levels in this area make me bias. Our emotional intelligence and psychological intelligence is waaaay higher imo. In general I would say a 15 year old boys is higher than a 30 year old womans. Just due to our nature and expereience levels. At 15 you probably had more experience trying to manipulate your way into a girls pants than a 30 year old woman.

Experience trumps the whole brain is fully developed at 25 thing

 

[FeverPitch2]

So. No nudes? No OF name?

 

[Ohene]

The tweet is using the term 'grooming'' incorrectly. Certain academic terms and terms from Psychology and therapy have made their way onto social media and they get applied incorrectly.

The woman had almost zero contact with the 25 year old man when he was a below the age of consent/ minor.

Listen I'm all in support of holding female perpetrators of sex abuse accountable in the same way men are but you looser nikkas are taking it and trying to run with on social media etc
as some type of unsophisticated 'gotcha' because y'all are losing in the dating game and your favorite Black male celebrities are getting hit with sex abuse allegations (some of it is false or bs).

Gaslighting is another term ppl stay misusing

 

[The Plug]

Nothing sexual, she just meant food.

 

[Rozay Oro]

Damn handsome gang got it good

 

[SheWantTheD]

It doesnt matter how attractivel the man is. The potential manipulation factor due to advanced mouthpiece is what makes the young girl a victim. If a young girl was just attracted to an older guy and wanted to sleep with him,I wouldnt put her in the "victim" category based on the act. But she would become a victim over time due to manipulation factor within the relationship. I consider victims to be girls who are preyed upon like you said. By older men using advanced mouthpiece,preying on young girls insecurities etc. You cant put every young girl in that category. Because some like older men,and will even lie about their age to get one. Is she a victim still?

I just dont see a older woman being able to talk her way into sex . So that takes away the manipulation factor.Even if the young man is only 15-16. In fact in most of the cases ive seen with teachers. The young dudes are talking the teachers into sex with underdeveloped mouthpiece

Men are simply smarter in areas of psychological manipulation. Women get us to have sex with them by playing on our horniness and attraction to them. There is only an age where that begins(puberty) and an age where it stops(death)

Did you even read my post son?

I never said physical attraction was the only factor. I said it can be used to prey on underaged minors.

A teenager can find an adult physically attractive, it doesn't mean they weren't manipulated.

Damn y'all cats have some dumb takes!

 

[D.C Young]

My lord, because it's an appeal to nature fallacy, I already noted that. For example, in the animal kingdom, some animals cull their children if they are weak and some animals force reproduction on mating partners. Why don't we do that? Because we have evolved enough to understand the moral implications of our actions. I have evolved enough to understand that being physically attracted to something isn't a justification to engage in sexual activity following the moral implications. There, I have answered you once again, now answer my question, because you are either lacking in reading comprehension, which would be unsurprising or you are glossing over words.

So you are sexually attracted to Teenage girls then right?

A minute ago, you said you didn't.

"In this hypothetical, the girl, 15 years of age, is physically developed and as you put it countless times "is fertile and is ready and capable of reproducing", I want to know if given the opportunity, barring any legal ramifications, would you engage in sexual activity with the girl and if not, why?
Going to dodge the question again?"

No I wouldn't have sex with a teenage girl because its not practical.

If she were to get pregnant, she would be too young to properly steer a child.

but that's not the point, nobody is arguing that you should be having sex with a teenage girl

I'm simply saying that men are sexually attracted to teenage girls the most.

but you actually said that you are not sexually attracted to teenage girls which is unusual because they are of child bearing age.

 

[Art Barr]

Former young brehs of handsome gang: Did you ever take it seriously when a MILF like above called you cute looked at you like //

or some comment about when you grown?

Did it have an impact on you?

Did you feel like it was weird?

Do you even remember them?

Is it grooming?

Did you make good on the promise?

Some people saying not only she was wrong for saying what she said but that she’s a predator and p3do








Parents of the Coli, how are you feeling as well?

important convo to be had.


For unrelated reasons, @Love Bizarre @Charlie Hustle

Anybody with an issue with this.
That is why you not lothario.

Art Barr