Did this BIG T.TTY MILF groom a young breh??

Is she a Predatóur?

  • Yes, she groomed the boy

  • No, she just got big t.tty

  • No, but she was wrong for what she said

  • Jail

  • I’m grown now, what’s her @?


Results are only viewable after voting.

D.C Young

TMC
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
4,252
Reputation
549
Daps
10,231
Reppin
NULL
Now here comes the matter of importance, our decisions in life are based on our priors, whether we realize it or not, without addressing the priors, everything following it is happenstance and could easily be based on faulty logic.

With that said, a girl enters their reproductive years at ~13 years of age, I will be generous and push it to the age of 15 for this discussion. In this hypothetical, the girl, 15 years of age, is physically developed and as you put it countless times "is fertile and is ready and capable of reproducing", I want to know if given the opportunity, barring any legal ramifications, would you engage in sexual activity with the girl and if not, why?


Ofcourse I wouldn't

But why do you keep avoiding my question?

You said that you are not sexually attracted to teenage girls.

Why are you the only creature in the animal kingdom that's not attracted to someone who is fertile and ready and capable of reproducing?

How come you have been able to bypass the laws of nature?
 

Reflected

Living in fear in the year of the tiger.
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
6,123
Reputation
1,655
Daps
20,842
Ofcourse I wouldn't

But why do you keep avoiding my question?

You said that you are not sexually attracted to teenage girls.

Why are you the only creature in the animal kingdom that's not attracted to someone who is fertile and ready and capable of reproducing?

How come you have been able to bypass the laws of nature?
My lord, because it's an appeal to nature fallacy, I already noted that. For example, in the animal kingdom, some animals cull their children if they are weak and some animals force reproduction on mating partners. Why don't we do that? Because we have evolved enough to understand the moral implications of our actions. I have evolved enough to understand that being physically attracted to something isn't a justification to engage in sexual activity following the moral implications. There, I have answered you once again, now answer my question, because you are either lacking in reading comprehension, which would be unsurprising or you are glossing over words.


Answer this:

In this hypothetical, the girl, 15 years of age, is physically developed and as you put it countless times "is fertile and is ready and capable of reproducing", I want to know if given the opportunity, barring any legal ramifications, would you engage in sexual activity with the girl and if not, why?

:sas2: Going to dodge the question again?
 

Still Benefited

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
39,316
Reputation
8,381
Daps
98,865
You might be a bit too dumb for this conversation, bro. Being attracted to the physique of a female does mean you should engage in sexual activity with a teenager. Also, my approach to life would dictate that 18 year olds should not be allowed to participate in porn, that approach is in line with our current understanding of the human brain. Adult aged should be considered 25 years of age in developed nations, not some arbitrary standard based on what we feel is adult, the physical properties of the brain, unchanging in the face of opinion, dictates otherwise.


That wasnt the question you were asked,but failed to comprehend. And also got highly defensive about for reasons I dont know:picard:. Although your frontal lobe argument has no real merit. I have also stated before that age of consent for women should be raised to 21. Thecoli also got upset and acted like I was a terrorist.

My argument is that there is no real difference between a 15 year old and 18 year old physically or mentally. So an 18 year old shouldnt be approached by advanced men who can manipulate them. Or who girls would look to as authority figures.


This is different with men. I dont believe that an older woman could spit game and manipulate a young man into sex. I really just cant imagine this happening with words. She can only use her body parts and his horniness against him.

Well okay,tell me what age wont that be the case for men mr frontal lobe:mjlol:


And thats a rhetorical question,Id rather us not have to dialogue anymore. You seem like a jackass who needs to cool off for the night. With all due respect:hubie:
 

CodeKansas

Superstar
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
5,923
Reputation
1,277
Daps
23,597
Seems like she made the off hand comment then let it alone. Years would pass with seemingly no other actions taken.

Not grooming, but still creepy as fukk. You don't say that shyt to youngins.
 

Reflected

Living in fear in the year of the tiger.
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
6,123
Reputation
1,655
Daps
20,842
That wasnt the question you were asked,but failed to comprehend. And also got highly defensive about for reasons I dont know:picard:. Although your frontal lobe argument has no real merit. I have also stated before that age of consent for women should be raised to 21. Thecoli also got upset and acted like I was a terrorist.

My argument is that there is no real difference between a 15 year old and 18 year old physically or mentally. So an 18 year old shouldnt be approached by advanced men who can manipulate them. Or who girls would look to as authority figures.


This is different with men. I dont believe that an older woman could spit game and manipulate a young man into sex. I really just cant imagine this happening with words. She can only use her body parts and his horniness against him.

Well okay,tell me what age wont that be the case for men mr frontal lobe:mjlol:


And thats a rhetorical question,Id rather us not have to dialogue anymore. You seem like a jackass who needs to cool off for the night. With all due respect:hubie:


Apologies, I didn't mean to come off as rude but I'm still waiting for this idiot to reply to my hypothetical above, most people can't answer the "why" of that question. Also, I don't agree with your position as its arbitrary on the basis of nothing objective. My position on raising the the age of consent is inline with what we can observe as a objective property of the human mind, and that is the development of the section of the brain that is related to reasoning. And there are definitely observable differences between a 15 year old and a 18 year old both physically and mentally, we can observe the difference in brain matter (white/gray) and something as simple as plates fusing occurs over time. I think you are getting at the face value appearance, but that is left to the subjective for the most part. I'm sticking to what is objective to fortify the justification of increasing the legal age as opposed to an age that I feel is adulthood. We are on the same page, but I want a stronger argument for the position, thus the basis of objective properties.

edit: I'm pretty sure that p*ssy just got off, that's why I don't engage with idiots, they always act in bad faith even if they don't realize it. Anyways, I couldn't put it in the rep comment but people acting in bad faith do enrage me, I won't lie. When you responded I thought you were strawmanning my position as I already outlined why something like physical attraction was irrelevant in the matter, a matter which was based on moral implications. That is why I asked him the hypothetical above. Because I can answer the "why" of why I wouldn't engage in that activity, I wanted his answer as it would reveal his earlier reasoning. He just keep appealing to nature fallacy earlier.



This is different with men. I dont believe that an older woman could spit game and manipulate a young man into sex. I really just cant imagine this happening with words. She can only use her body parts and his horniness against him.

For this, it's the same way men coerce boys into sexual activity, through power dynamics. Point is, even in a situation where the boy is entirely influenced by "horniness", they don't fully understand the implications of sexual activity, the adult is more capable of understanding and that is where the fault in morality lies. They are exploiting an underdeveloped mind. And I already mentioned I have been engaged with older women that perused me in a sexual manner when I was a minor, I'm years removed from that and it still bothers me to this day. So it's not really something that boys seek because they don't fully grasp what is happening.
 
Last edited:

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
39,467
Reputation
2,005
Daps
97,755
Promiscuous women will have sex with underaged boys and girls no doubt.

That shyt is to promote her onlyfans and there’s nothing funny about looking at a child that way and telling them when they come of age they can come get a taste. :martin:

If a man said the same shyt his page would have been deleted faster than he pressed post and he would have been doxxed and fired from his job.
 

SheWantTheD

Veteran
Joined
Sep 10, 2015
Messages
39,467
Reputation
2,005
Daps
97,755
That wasnt the question you were asked,but failed to comprehend. And also got highly defensive about for reasons I dont know:picard:. Although your frontal lobe argument has no real merit. I have also stated before that age of consent for women should be raised to 21. Thecoli also got upset and acted like I was a terrorist.

My argument is that there is no real difference between a 15 year old and 18 year old physically or mentally. So an 18 year old shouldnt be approached by advanced men who can manipulate them. Or who girls would look to as authority figures.


This is different with men. I dont believe that an older woman could spit game and manipulate a young man into sex. I really just cant imagine this happening with words. She can only use her body parts and his horniness against him.

Well okay,tell me what age wont that be the case for men mr frontal lobe:mjlol:


And thats a rhetorical question,Id rather us not have to dialogue anymore. You seem like a jackass who needs to cool off for the night. With all due respect:hubie:
This is just dumb logic

Because men who are found to be physically attractive by women in general can use that to prey on young girls and younger women.

A woman preying on young boys is no different than a man preying on young girls. Often times predators go after vulnerable children, teens and young adults who lack parental supervision and strong guardians and protectors.

There was a black male YouTuber who made a video on having sex with teenage white girls who spoke on this. Said girls with good relationships with their parents were more difficult to persuade and get access to.

Predatory behavior is predatory regardless. You know how many stories I’ve heard from girl friends of their female friends getting them drunk so they can sexually assault them? Had one female friend who woke up to her “friend” going down on her.
 

Bryan Danielson

Jmare007 x Bryan Danielson x JLova = King Ghidorah
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
100,631
Reputation
8,897
Daps
197,620
Reppin
#We Are The Flash #DOOMSET #LukeCageSet #NEWLWO
Could care less, where the nudes

giphy.gif


THATS MY MOTHERfukkING (pun intended) BEST FRIEND YALL!!!:lolbron:


To the haters and coli babble niccas in here :umad::umad::umad::umad::umad::umad:
 
Top