hey you were the one that brought it up
Dev Says PS4 Will Out Power MOST PC's For YEARS To Come
- Thread starter Mowgli
- Start date
hey you were the one that brought it up
lol we can also make that argument ofr everything else: why buy a benz? why buy anything that's of higher end?? lol i love when cosoles kids are like "well you guys spend more money herp derp"
but if i have the money to blow then who cares
Breh I have a gaming PC. I play Crysis and Tomb Raider maxed out and the differences is huge but to say PS4 can't produce those visuals on max is insane. I'm sure the PS4 is better than my 550TI and AMD FX 4100. If that low-mid range spec can produce those visuals, why can't PS4 do? Hell Uncharted 3 still gives Tomb Raider a run for it's money in visuals and that's a PS3 game. Imagine if it were simply upscaled??
Graphics wise, PC gaming graphics aren't impressive because all it is is just higher resolutions and a slightly faster framerate. And with that.
pc >>>>>>>consoles LOL.
throughthefire
Pro
i never said the ps4 couldn't but im just loling as people saying the ps4 is as good as the BEST of current gen pc gaming..just wait until a year after the ps4 releases where 900 dollar pcs will have more graphical prowess then the ps4
throughthefire
Pro
omigod lololol crysis 3 on consoles looks like far cry 2 circa 08 hahaha
Last edited by a moderator:
crysis looks and has always looked like dogshyti dont trust nothing they say
the only game that has ever impressed me graphically this gen was Warhawk to this day
What's that other jawn you love? The Mech game. Armored Core right?
up in here
Superstar
$800
Yeah but.....that's 3* how much I spent on
a ps3.
i think your missing the point altogether. its not that you need to drop $800 on a gaming PC, its that it takes very little to upgrade a PC into a gaming PC.
like i got a $900 Asus laptop in mid-late 2011 and when i purchased it i needed a graphics card and RAM capable to run adobe premiere and after effects. i never even considered gaming on it until recently. turns out the thing actually is very good for gaming when i hook it up to my TV. its kicking my PS3's ass. and i love my PS3, cant wait for Last Of Us, but its not even close which one runs better. And with newer tech between the time i bought it and now im sure current or dedicated gaming PCs would do even better. i didn't need to spend anything extra to do it either, it was already fully capable. and this is a laptop, a PC from the same time would do even better. and thats kinda the point, people are already sitting on capable hardware, and if they are not it probably wouldn't cost that much to have their system turnt up.
To say PS4 will be more powerful than PCs for years to come is just bullshyt and i think we all know it. i mean, i love console gaming, but the technology does become dated rather quickly. even if they are squeezing everything they can out of it, in a couple years PC will just have better more capable technology. Thats not to say PS4 doesn't have impressive specs, because it does, but just based on costing and growth of technology, theres no way a PS4 will outdo a high end PC, or even a mid level PC a few years down the line.
Hold on, wait a moment. Which side you on. What set you claimin?
these nikkas are truly delusional, they literally think that minute graphical differences can make bad games like Hitman worth copping
none of these games are fun let alone do they warrant spending $600+ for in 2013
none of these games are fun let alone do they warrant spending $600+ for in 2013
throughthefire
Pro
these nikkas are truly delusional, they literally think that minute graphical differences can make bad games like Hitman worth copping
none of these games are fun let alone do they warrant spending $600+ for in 2013
wtf are you talking? hitman being a bad game is a matter of opinion..but objectively it looks alot nicer and smoother on the PC
... keep telling yourself your playing a game with frame rate drops on archaic technology is okay hahaha
wtf are you talking? hitman being a bad game is a matter of opinion..but objectively it looks alot nicer on the PC
but does it look $500+ nicer
which is a large unequivocal noi copped a new pc(im running a 560ti i-3770) and have played demos of damn near every new game out and sure enough the only ones ive found that are more fun on pcs are the usual suspects: strategy games and rpgs.
shooters are just not fun with a keyboard and mouse, duke nukem and quake were popular 15 years ago dog, let it go
Oh you making games now?
I can check my vram usage chief, even Crysis 3 on ultra settings isn't using 100% of my vram. If you think a developer out there right now is developing a game that requires HALF the available ram you're out of your mind, considering that it just recently came out that the system would have 8gb of ram.
throughthefire
Pro
but does it look $500+ nicer
i copped a new pc(im running a 560ti i-3770) and have played demos of damn near every new game out and sure enough the only ones ive found that are more fun on pcs are the usual suspects: strategy games and rpgs.
shooters are just not fun with a keyboard and mouse, duke nukem and quake were popular 15 years ago dog, let it go
kk NOW I KNOW you're trolling and breh you act as if i use my pc for only gaming...i have auto-cad in it, aspen plus...simulation programs that require high processing power..i use it for work, watching high def movies, surfing the net, multi tasking...all of that warrants a 900 dollar price tag..gl doing that ish on your 400 dollar budget pc with your ps3 LMAOOO
id say you and your ilk are the trolls brah
the sales numbers over the years prove thisplaying shooters on pc is a thing of the past