Not to go back and forth with this with you again, but that has no precedent because those guys got suspended under a different structure. Second, the NFL doesn’t want to suspend star players so they would love to defer this to someone else and say we support the decision. If anything, the NFL can appeal and it would go to Goodell. If they don’t then it shows that they’re not pressed. It’s really that simple.That's going to set a precedent for future suspensions that I don't think the NFL wants to happen. Depending on the numbers, I'd be pissed if I were other players who have gotten suspended for less than what Watson was accused of. If I got in trouble with the NFL, I'd point right to the point situation and say that he only got such and such number of games and I should get that range as well.
Not to go back and forth with this with you again, but that has no precedent because those guys got suspended under a different structure. Second, the NFL doesn’t want to suspend star players so they would love to defer this to someone else and say we support the decision. If anything, the NFL can appeal and it would go to Goodell. If they don’t then it shows that they’re not pressed. It’s really that simple.
Different structure is irrelevant to the point as the accusations are more severe than what they were accused of. It’s also relevant because it sets up future precedent with future player suspensions which will obviously happen.
The person rendering the decision is a literally judge and even Goodell is going to be hesitant to overrule her decision and increase the suspension to what they want. Regardless of how you spin it, other NFL players are paying attention to this decision in case they end up in the exact situation with the ire of the league.
It’s literally going to set the new standard going forward.
How can u suspend a guy that already missed an entire season over this and has had no charges filed against him? He's won every court battle vs these whores.That's going to set a precedent for future suspensions that I don't think the NFL wants to happen. Depending on the numbers, I'd be pissed if I were other players who have gotten suspended for less than what Watson was accused of. If I got in trouble with the NFL, I'd point right to the point situation and say that he only got such and such number of games and I should get that range as well.
How can u suspend a guy that already missed an entire season over this and has had no charges filed against him? He's won every court battle vs these whores.
That'd be a losing argument as even they know he's going to get suspended, but are trying to get that number as low as possible. That'd be the better course of action that trying to argue that he doesn't deserve one at all.thinking about it more, it's weird for his team to announce this, too. if they were operating from a position of strength they'd just say "he's not going to get a suspension because the evidence shows he doesn't deserve one."
They were responding to the NFL leaking that they will seek a full year. Showing that you’re willing to appeal that suspension means that you think it’s not credible and you’re not giving in to the fact that his actions warrant something so lengthy. If you’re “fighting for your name” then you make it clear that you’re willing to fight. You’re thinking too hard. This is their response in the PR fight.thinking about it more, it's weird for his team to announce this, too. if they were operating from a position of strength they'd just say "he's not going to get a suspension because the evidence shows he doesn't deserve one."
Its also been revealed Hou set some of these appointments up. They didn't want him to play becuz of this. Thats a suspension imo. He missed a yr out of his career over this.1. That wasn't a suspension. The Texans chose to willingly sit him out and 2. You don't have to be charged anything to be suspended as shown by the NFL previously.