Did you already forget Hilldog promoted him cuz she thought he would be an easy lay up? Not the exact same as this thread but very similar. This is a demonic strategy and could backfire just like it did in 2016.
Did you already forget Hilldog promoted him cuz she thought he would be an easy lay up? Not the exact same as this thread but very similar. This is a demonic strategy and could backfire just like it did in 2016.
I get their "strategy" here but honestly it's a waste of money to try to buy a turnout that's still unpredictable.
People have wanted the Democrats to get more aggressive and play the Republicans at some of their own games. Well here you are, trying to promote horrendous candidates in hopes that'll be easy to beat ala Dr. Oz and Herschel Walker.
Again, giving 35 million to far right radicals is despicable.It isn't.
GOP paid for ads saying an NC candidate was 'progressive' and 'one of us'
A GOP Super PAC said the ads promoting a challenger to Democratic Senate candidiate Cal Cunningham in North Carolina forced him to spend money.rollcall.com
I don't think this garnered any faux outrage, but it's likely because they thought it would help CC
They didn't give money to his campaign.Again, giving 35 million to far right radicals is despicable.
I like. GOP chose this course and it's a good reminder to folks that this is still who they are even with Trump out of the white house.Pelosi Defends Democratic Party Boosting Trump Loyalist Republican Candidates
Nancy Pelosi sees no problem with the Democratic Party spending money to boost Trump loyalist Republicans in primary battles.www.mediaite.com