How would they convey this to the public at large in the context of the Republican smear machine where truth doesn't matter? Assertive statement are not enough to break that stigma. How would Democrats reassure other groups when the target flips back to them after they threw trans people under the bus? How would this effect trans allies?What didn’t I answer?
I’m pretty direct. Democrat leadership needs to indicate they’re against trans participation in sports, against the bathroom stuff, or youth affirmation therapy etc.
The realization is that most democrats and functionally all republicans don’t care enough to defend trans issues this much. You’re confusing the noise of trans activists to the reality of how unpopular their stances are.How would they convey this to the public at large in the context of the Republican smear machine where truth doesn't matter? Assertive statement are not enough to break that stigma. How would Democrats reassure other groups when the target flips back to them after they threw trans people under the bus? How would this effect trans allies?
Should men compete in women’s sports?
You keep avoiding the question. Why?The realization is that most democrats and functionally all republicans don’t care enough to defend trans issues this much. You’re confusing the noise of trans activists to the reality of how unpopular their stances are.
Also, the threat of the sliding scale against other groups is how we get to the point where we can’t even push back on trans excesses in public discourse. If we can’t offer pushback on some things, then we won’t offer pushback ever on anything. What you’re insinuating is that we have to allow everything or else some how some way some other marginalized group will suffer. There is a limit, and it has been reached. Speak to actual gays and lesbians who don’t appreciate trans issues.
Glad you agree, but you’re wrong. It moved the election massively up to 3% in Trump’s favor in some polling data.No, but that ain’t a big deal or major issue with the a majority of the electorate.
It’s only a big deal with homophobic ppl who probably don’t even come across transgender ppl in the everyday life.
again, what is the actual question? I keep answering you in detail and you keep gaslighting me about my elaborate responses.You keep avoiding the question. Why?
I mean, I don’t know many solidly blue districts where if a progressive ran with party backing that they would lose. But progressives skew younger and that group will never outvote older people.It's not even a "they don't vote". I'm just pointing out that the voter numbers aren't there or at least in meaningful numbers in numerous places or we would have more AOC/XYZ across the country in state legislators/congress/senate.
They think if democratic become political incorrect on social issues like trannies and I would throw in as well Police Brutality it will get them the vote I think what leftist democratic and other thought leader relate to the democratic party are looking for is their own version of the Southern Strategy with a Left-wing populism bend to it.What is some of ya deal with trannies?
The same way you, a genetic Indian, can be blackHow is a genetic male, a female?
I’m black though.The same way you, a genetic Indian, can be black
No.I’m black though.
How is a genetic male, a female?