Democratic Party Rebuild

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,488
Reputation
3,898
Daps
108,394
Reppin
Detroit
Senate parliamentarian has no unilateral control over senate rules, it's a glorified external opinion board.

Not the senate parliamentarian?! 😱


Educate me :patrice:the Senate can just ignore parliamentarian rules whenever they want?

And had they tried this, you think it would've passed the Senate?


It's weird to me how people expect Dems to do things that the makeup of Congress inherently prevents (but have no such expectations of the GOP).
 

Bleed The Freak

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
12,396
Reputation
1,476
Daps
44,715
Folks need to learn one important lesson

Every and anything is for sale when it comes to power. Morals, policy positions you name it.

Focus on personal success and growth. And stop thinking the next candidate is the answer you've been seeking.

I've learned staying off TV, social media has been therapeutic.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,488
Reputation
3,898
Daps
108,394
Reppin
Detroit
Yes

No because some Dems would have voted against it. (That’s the jig you keep falling for)

I'll assume for the sake of argument that Dems could've just ignored the parliamentary rule completely if they wanted to.

What exactly is Biden or whatever other hypothetical Dem president supposed to do about this? Clearly just telling them to pass it doesn't work.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,577
Reputation
2,596
Daps
135,272
I'll assume for the sake of argument that Dems could've just ignored the parliamentary rule completely if they wanted to.

What exactly is Biden or whatever other hypothetical Dem president supposed to do about this? Clearly just telling them to pass it doesn't work.
Ask yourself this, what would donald trump or republicans do if a republican senator refused to go along with a major party platform that trump ran on?
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,348
Reputation
-13,892
Daps
131,790
I'll assume for the sake of argument that Dems could've just ignored the parliamentary rule completely if they wanted to.

What exactly is Biden or whatever other hypothetical Dem president supposed to do about this? Clearly just telling them to pass it doesn't work.
These dudes are just ad uninformed as their far right counterparts, I want them show us all the none budget items the republicans have passed during reconciliation

im still :mjlol: that they think campaign on the federal minimum Wage will rally voters
 

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
42,737
Reputation
9,536
Daps
189,657
Reppin
NULL
I thought this was Higer learning.

*Higher
The Federal minimum wage is not a budget item. It can’t be changed during reconciliation

“The [presiding officer] rules on points of order, not the parliamentarian; the parliamentarian merely advises the [presiding officer].” In other words, the presiding officer may rule on points of order independently of the parliamentarian. And senators may overturn the ruling of the presiding officer when he or she follows the parliamentarian’s advice.
 
Last edited:

AquaCityBoy

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
42,737
Reputation
9,536
Daps
189,657
Reppin
NULL
I'll assume for the sake of argument that Dems could've just ignored the parliamentary rule completely if they wanted to.

What exactly is Biden or whatever other hypothetical Dem president supposed to do about this? Clearly just telling them to pass it doesn't work.

Nothing, just like they always do.

Because why would we expect anything more when Democrats are in power. :unimpressed:
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,437
Reputation
6,307
Daps
168,406
I'll assume for the sake of argument that Dems could've just ignored the parliamentary rule completely if they wanted to.
There is no argument. They could have ignored the parliamentarian if they wanted:
They have been overruled in a couple of significant moments. In 1975, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller ignored the parliamentarian’s advice when the Senate debated filibuster rules. In 2013, Democrats overruled MacDonough to eliminate filibusters to approve presidential nominees. In 2017, Republicans further expanded the filibuster ban on Supreme Court nominations.

the precedent is there.

What exactly is Biden or whatever other hypothetical Dem president supposed to do about this? Clearly just telling them to pass it doesn't work.
brudda, you keep talking about the parliamentarian. I am telling you the Dems didn’t have enough senators who wanted to increase the minimum wage.
 
Top