"Death to the Pessimistic State of Mind" - Nas Voice: NYK '23 Pre-Season Thread

Controversy

Superstar
Joined
May 29, 2015
Messages
13,391
Reputation
-220
Daps
35,682
Reppin
Philly
I think creativity is a big aspect of it but not the whole bag. For example, IQ didn’t get more creative this year but he did get stronger. So his handling is more effective because he can’t be bumped off-balance so easily any more.

For RJ, I think just improving finishing with his right hand will go a long way.

For the bulldozer type ball-handlers; misdirection is their best weapon. If you can make a defender lean, you can bump him that way and use his own momentum to create space (obi did this for what feels like the first time last night on a drive into lamarcus Aldridge which is hype).

So if RJ can expand his shot profile to a place where defenders can’t press him left reliably, he’ll unlock new options to break guys down. He’s already shown some improvement going and finishing right, but he definitely turns back to his left hand more often than I’d like. I think this is another spot we’ll see growth though.

I wouldn’t count on rj crossing dudes up and finessing around the floor. But he’ll get better at creating enough space to get the shots off.

I also bet they’ll have him working on dribbling through the paint like PG’s are taught to. He picks his dribble up early and that’s making it easy to jump his passing lanes.

He should look to young Paul Pierce as a guide of how to play
 

RubioTheCruel

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
21,647
Reputation
2,270
Daps
80,137
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
Hypothetical (I was gonna bring this up after Sunday)

Donovan Mitchell becomes available this summer (or at least Utah listens).

Knicks win the lottery.

Do you entertain a deal with the main parts going back to Utah are the #1 pick and RJ for Mitchell?

It has to be something like this, not a trade for trade's sake.

Not married to Barrett but I think Mitchell is very, very overrated. Building your team around a small chucker doesn't seem like the smartest idea
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,768
Reputation
9,224
Daps
207,708
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
The priority this offseason needs to be to get rid of Randle, so respectfully fukk every single of one of these trade proposals I've had to read for the last couple of pages
Good luck. He's dangerously close to becoming a top 5 worst contract in the league.

The big hope there is that Tobias Harris plays like such crap in the playoffs that Morey decides to just be pot committed and add Randle straight up. Otherwise, Randle plummeted his value at the worst time.

No. Number 1 pick plus 2 promising rookie scale players and a vet is more than fair for Mitchell.
Barrett won't be on the rookie scale after next season. He'll get paid what Mitchell gets most likely.
 

mvp_status

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
12,682
Reputation
2,237
Daps
38,734
Good luck. He's dangerously close to becoming a top 5 worst contract in the league.

The big hope there is that Tobias Harris plays like such crap in the playoffs that Morey decides to just be pot committed and add Randle straight up. Otherwise, Randle plummeted his value at the worst time.

Facts but I'm willing to attach assets to get that done, assets that may not be available if a separate Mitchell trade were to occur.

The return isn't as important as just removing him from the equation imo
 

RickyGQ

No nikkas!
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,578
Reputation
2,006
Daps
57,386
Reppin
NJ
Good luck. He's dangerously close to becoming a top 5 worst contract in the league.

The big hope there is that Tobias Harris plays like such crap in the playoffs that Morey decides to just be pot committed and add Randle straight up. Otherwise, Randle plummeted his value at the worst time.


Barrett won't be on the rookie scale after next season. He'll get paid what Mitchell gets most likely.
that’s part of the reason I’m on the fence about Mitchell. Losing depth to get him isn’t ideal cause then we’d have to basically complete the roster before RJs extension kicks in. It tightens the window significantly.
 
Last edited:

mvp_status

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
12,682
Reputation
2,237
Daps
38,734
I agree 100%. Moving Randle and getting some decent back is the only priority I could see this FO having.

If a star becomes available fine, priorities change. I just don't see one on the horizon. Utah doesn't have to move Mitchell they can move Gobert and buy time.

Still not as gung-ho about Mitchell as some, but I'd be much more receptive to that trade when it doesn't leave him and Randle sucking up half the teams cap by themselves
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
26,639
Reputation
4,938
Daps
100,661
Reppin
New York City
Good luck. He's dangerously close to becoming a top 5 worst contract in the league.

The big hope there is that Tobias Harris plays like such crap in the playoffs that Morey decides to just be pot committed and add Randle straight up. Otherwise, Randle plummeted his value at the worst time.

Barrett won't be on the rookie scale after next season. He'll get paid what Mitchell gets most likely.

I have to disagree, Randle is a bad contract. However I don’t think he is near top five or even top 10 just based on scale of his contract. He’s a Pennie’s for a dollar type of trade where a team takes a risk on him and the Knicks get roleplayers or ideally an expiring and a draft pick for him. With this year’s draft and FA seen as weak. It’s actually an ideal situation to trade him. I also think he would rebound on a team outside of NY.

The real question is does the FO see him as a piece to move or are they hoping he’ll rebound in spite the fact he clearly hates being in NY.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,768
Reputation
9,224
Daps
207,708
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
I have to disagree, Randle is a bad contract. However I don’t think he is near top five or even top 10 just based on scale of his contract. He’s a Pennie’s for a dollar type of trade where a team takes a risk on him and the Knicks get roleplayers or ideally an expiring and a draft pick for him. With this year’s draft and FA seen as weak. It’s actually an ideal situation to trade him. I also think he would rebound on a team outside of NY.

The real question is does the FO see him as a piece to move or are they hoping he’ll rebound in spite the fact he clearly hates being in NY.
Free agency is weak, but because of that, not many teams set themselves up to have money this summer anyway.

the draft hurts Randle in that the best prospects are big men (inversely, this draft hurts the Knicks in that there aren't many PG prospects near the top of the draft), so even a team who otherwise wouldn't mind Randle would rather just draft Holmgren/Smith/Banchero/Murray
 

RickyGQ

No nikkas!
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,578
Reputation
2,006
Daps
57,386
Reppin
NJ
Free agency is weak, but because of that, not many teams set themselves up to have money this summer anyway.

the draft hurts Randle in that the best prospects are big men (inversely, this draft hurts the Knicks in that there aren't many PG prospects near the top of the draft), so even a team who otherwise wouldn't mind Randle would rather just draft Holmgren/Smith/Banchero/Murray
I still think the Portlands and Sacramento’s are an option for him. Those middling lottery teams that need to take a gamble propel then into playoff contention.
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
26,639
Reputation
4,938
Daps
100,661
Reppin
New York City
Free agency is weak, but because of that, not many teams set themselves up to have money this summer anyway.

the draft hurts Randle in that the best prospects are big men (inversely, this draft hurts the Knicks in that there aren't many PG prospects near the top of the draft), so even a team who otherwise wouldn't mind Randle would rather just draft Holmgren/Smith/Banchero/Murray

They don’t have to trade him into a team’s cap space. Teams having money on the books help, because expirings aren’t that valuable either. Next year’s FA is maybe even weaker than this years.

Also your examples are all top #5 to maybe #7 picks. After that you’re looking at maybe Sochan being considered worth more than Randle. I feel like Chet, Duren, and Mark Williams wouldn’t fill the same spot on a team either since all 3 are centers. That 20 picks Randle could be traded for.

Multiple teams have multiple picks in a weak draft and a weak FA that is the precursor to a even weaker FA next year. If the Knicks are willing to take picks and expiring or just roleplayers for Randle a trade will happen. There isn’t a lot of ways for teams to shake up their rosters outside of the trade and Randle is still talented enough teams will take that chance.

The only real impediment to a trade happening is if the Knicks rather keep Randle because they have to do stupid shyt like that to appease Dolan. Also because honestly Randle is talented. There is a good chance he thrives on another team. It’s just clear NY has him toxic as fukk.
 
Top