"Death to the Pessimistic State of Mind" - Nas Voice: NYK '23 Pre-Season Thread

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,406
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
How is forcing a nikka to do something he ain't good at while not letting him to the things he's good at development? :jbhmm:
Outside of RJ improving, the whole season was clipped the minute Rose went down :francis:
Idk if we're "forcing" him to do anything. There are times when he has the lane that he drives from the perimeter. There are times when it's better to shoot it. If he wants to be a starter in this league he needs to hit the 3. Otherwise, he's playing the best role he can right now which is backup PF.

He should be getting more screen and roll action. They should be able to post him up at least a couple of times a night. I love when he gets to run the same dribble handoff play that Randle does all game long. He could be used more dynamically than that corner spot he’s so frequently glued to.
Except for the "post him up" party, I don't disagree with this. I don't see Obi as this beast off the pick and roll everyone else thinks he is. His ability is based mostly off athleticism.
That’s not his game :mjtf:

Why can’t you develop his jumpshot off hours while you use him the way he’s the most productive?
I don't think you guys really wanna see how exposed Obi will be if we try to run pick and roll with him when there's not a good pick and roll ball handler on the court. You want Obi to be good regardless of who's on the floor? Get him to hit that catch-and-shoot 3 consistently. I'm not asking for him to shoot off the dribble.
 
Last edited:

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,406
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
CP from KnicksFanTV said he believes the Knicks have more of a management issue then a coaching. I couldn't disagree with him more. Not excusing management because of some questionable decisions or non decisions but I think they've done a better job than Thibs has. Thibs from the playoffs till this season has not been good & has been exposed somewhat for his deficiencies

What do you guys think?
Do you think we overperformed last season or underperformed?

If you think we overperformed, then we obviously have a good coach. Management hasn't put together a great team outside of drafting. Everyone we signed outside of arguably Alec Burks has underperformed their contract (Randle, Rose, Noel, Taj, Fournier and Kemba). All management has done from the beginning is play it conservative, which ironically is the same thing Thibs is getting killed for. So again, outside of drafting (which we can also argue that the kids are playing well partially due to the coaching system), where has management overperformed the way Thibs did last season?
 

Knicksman20

Superstar
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
17,041
Reputation
5,373
Daps
47,928
Reppin
NY
Do you think we overperformed last season or underperformed?

If you think we overperformed, then we obviously have a good coach. Management hasn't put together a great team outside of drafting. Everyone we signed outside of arguably Alec Burks has underperformed their contract (Randle, Rose, Noel, Taj, Fournier and Kemba). All management has done from the beginning is play it conservative, which ironically is the same thing Thibs is getting killed for. So again, outside of drafting (which we can also argue that the kids are playing well partially due to the coaching system), where has management overperformed the way Thibs did last season?

We over-performed but you're always simplifying things to fit your narrative.

There were so many other factors in play that ALLOWED us to over-perform like playing in the bubble, the addition of D-Rose, & no one expected Randle to play the way he did just to name a few. That was the major factor but he & Thibs were exposed during the playoffs when the fans came back. We were brought right back to earth which has carried over into this season. Thibs coaching & the way he approaches the game are 2 of the major issues with the team now. It was either the FO or a light bulb finally went off in Thibs head because he realized the rookies can actually contribute but it's too little too late. We've had so many close loses, whose to say one of the those rookies couldn't have contributed to a W with a rebound/pass/score/steal in a crucial moment in one of those games. We'll never know because Thibs would rather run vets into the ground instead.

You and me will never agree on this because you're stuck bro
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,810
Reputation
5,282
Daps
64,167
Reppin
NYC
Idk if we're "forcing" him to do anything. There are times when he has the lane that he drives from the perimeter. There are times when it's better to shoot it. If he wants to be a starter in this league he needs to hit the 3. Otherwise, he's playing the best role he can right now which is backup PF.


Except for the "post him up" party, I don't disagree with this. I don't see Obi as this beast off the pick and roll everyone else thinks he is. His ability is based mostly off athleticism.

I don't think you guys really wanna see how exposed Obi will be if we try to run pick and roll with him when there's not a good pick and roll ball handler on the court.
You want Obi to be good regardless of who's on the floor? Get him to hit that catch-and-shoot 3 consistently. I'm not asking for him to shoot off the dribble.

I would MUCH rather he "get exposed" attempting to do everything he dominated in college with than get exposed for the same weaknesses we all knew about before the draft. If he wasn't going to be used as a pick and roll big, then he shouldn't have been the pick. Does he need a three-pointer to open his game up? Absolutely. Does that mean he shouldn't get to play to the strengths he'd shown before the NBA at all? Nah, I don't agree with that.

His college tape shows a pick and roll big that can post-up smaller guys and has excellent vision to kill doubles (also a dominant transition player which has translated because that's beyond half-court roles). You don't draft that player in the top-ten to take on the weakside corner role until his three-point shot clicks. Even if he's trade-bait without the jumper, you have to let him play to his strengths to pump his value. And if he does end up being bad in the pick and roll, then you drafted a bust. But that's a risk you took when you selected him.
 

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,406
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
I would MUCH rather he "get exposed" attempting to do everything he dominated in college with than get exposed for the same weaknesses we all knew about before the draft.
But why? :dwillhuh:

That's not development, that's maintaining the skills he already has. We want Obi to be better than the player we drafted. Imagine we told RJ we only want him to do what he's good at. Again, we SHOULD be running more pick and rolls for Obi... But I get why we don't. He works best with Rose and he's out

If he wasn't going to be used as a pick and roll big, then he shouldn't have been the pick.
I feel like he was picked as a combination of Randle replacement and BPA. I don't think we need to run more sets for him to say we shouldn't have picked him... That's apparent regardless unless we trade Julius
Does he need a three-pointer to open his game up? Absolutely. Does that mean he shouldn't get to play to the strengths he'd shown before the NBA at all? Nah, I don't agree with that.

His college tape shows a pick and roll big that can post-up smaller guys and has excellent vision to kill doubles (also a dominant transition player which has translated because that's beyond half-court roles). You don't draft that player in the top-ten to take on the weakside corner role until his three-point shot clicks. Even if he's trade-bait without the jumper, you have to let him play to his strengths to pump his value. And if he does end up being bad in the pick and roll, then you drafted a bust. But that's a risk you took when you selected him.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't see Obi being successful in the NBA the same way he was successful in college. He's not gonna be as successful posting up smaller players because the NBA is bigger... He showed us last year he's not that strong. The transition game is already apparent. I agree with you but his value is going to skyrocket if he gets confident in shooting the 3 because as you admitted, it's going to open up his game... Especially when he starts cutting because teams are respecting his shot
We over-performed but you're always simplifying things to fit your narrative.

There were so many other factors in play that ALLOWED us to over-perform like playing in the bubble, the addition of D-Rose, & no one expected Randle to play the way he did just to name a few. That was the major factor but he & Thibs were exposed during the playoffs when the fans came back. We were brought right back to earth which has carried over into this season. Thibs coaching & the way he approaches the game are 2 of the major issues with the team now. It was either the FO or a light bulb finally went off in Thibs head because he realized the rookies can actually contribute but it's too little too late. We've had so many close loses, whose to say one of the those rookies couldn't have contributed to a W with a rebound/pass/score/steal in a crucial moment in one of those games. We'll never know because Thibs would rather run vets into the ground instead.

You and me will never agree on this because you're stuck bro

As I recall, Thibs made every change we asked of him in the playoffs but none of it mattered because Julius sucked ass and the Hawks hid Trae on Reggie Bullock.

Everything else you're saying could be true but it's based on hypotheticals. I could just as easily argue that nothing would be different using facts. Quickley hit a slump, Reddish was a consistent negative in +/- , Obi was ass all year, Mitch needed most of the season to get back his conditioning, McBride hasn't dropped any super impressive stats outside of the g league.

I don't believe half of that, just saying that while you could be right you could also be wrong. So you're right, we'll never know because of how Thibs runs things, but if you're wrong then what do we do? Rehire the man?

We agree more than you think, I just don't think the solution to everything is to fire the coach. I think he likes our kids... His definition of development is just not what most of us want. I'm personally fine with it. I just hope Quentin can thoroughly outplay Fournier so I can see if Thibs is willing to start him
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
62,372
Reputation
17,761
Daps
347,635
First game I’ve seen all year we’re winning and it’s only due to rebounds and defense. Ugly ass game by Randle and Barrett. man
 

Anerdyblackguy

Gotta learn how to kill a nikka from the inside
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2015
Messages
62,372
Reputation
17,761
Daps
347,635
Lol at Thibs “You’re really going to call a foul like this this late in the game that’s some bullshyt ass refereeing”
 

storyteller

Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
16,810
Reputation
5,282
Daps
64,167
Reppin
NYC
But why? :dwillhuh:

That's not development, that's maintaining the skills he already has. We want Obi to be better than the player we drafted. Imagine we told RJ we only want him to do what he's good at. Again, we SHOULD be running more pick and rolls for Obi... But I get why we don't. He works best with Rose and he's out

This is a bit of a strawman. I don't think anybody's saying that he shouldn't do work on the things he's not good at. I wouldn't tell RJ to only do things he's good at, but I also wouldn't design the offense so that he rarely ever gets to do the things that he's good at. For one, being able to get going is big for rhythm and confidence. I don't think it's a coincidence that Obi often gets going inside before he hits three-pointers. Rhythm matters and establishing it is much easier by seeing the ball go through the hoop. Being able to do the things that he can help the team with also would help keep him on the floor longer. He's hurting you in a three-point shooter role, but last season he was statistically better as the roll-man than Noel or Gibson.

Again, this doesn't preclude him shooting threes. But it stops making his impact rely on the three-pointer as opposed to letting him build out from a comfort zone. Start with what you know and expand.



I feel like he was picked as a combination of Randle replacement and BPA. I don't think we need to run more sets for him to say we shouldn't have picked him... That's apparent regardless unless we trade Julius

How do you know his ability to replace Randle without letting him run plays that Randle gets to run? I doubt he could be the scorer that Randle is, but I think he could be an even better playmaker (especially out of the post). He just never gets enough plays to establish any gravity and let us see how he'd look in the system.

Maybe it's just me, but I don't see Obi being successful in the NBA the same way he was successful in college. He's not gonna be as successful posting up smaller players because the NBA is bigger... He showed us last year he's not that strong. The transition game is already apparent. I agree with you but his value is going to skyrocket if he gets confident in shooting the 3 because as you admitted, it's going to open up his game... Especially when he starts cutting because teams are respecting his shot

Strength is probably the one thing that virtually EVERY player develops once they hit the NBA. They can afford the nutritionists and trainers that even college programs can't match. We already see that with IQ's balance against physicality and there are signs of it when Obi posts guards. He has that quick turn to take the baseline that works on a lot of them. His passing out the post can be a weapon too. I just don't think he gets to do these things enough to even be able to tell what his ceilings are or how they'll look in rhythm. We can't cap the ceiling on them and it's not he doesn't need three-point range to get more opportunities at this stuff.
 
Top