mcdivit85
Superstar
You're inferring things that I'm not trying to imply.
I described that a woman should determine her "goodness" for herself based on how she conducts herself and lives her life, not solely (and perhaps without any consideration of) how she treats a male partner.
Listen close - That is not the same thing as treating someone poorly, if someone male or female believes they can treat others like shyt and still be "good people" I believe this happens every day. ... I think it takes a certain level of insecurity if one requires validation or support for their perceptions of self
Point is, as a woman, how I feel about ME has nothing to do with men in any way. ...if a man wants to feel the same way about women can't knock em.... it's how I live....what's good for the goose is good for the gander...but it still has nothing to do with treating others poorly
I didn't mean to infer poor treatment necessarily. I meant this: Can a man be "good" overall outside the context of woman? Meaning, according to your paradigm, a woman is "good" outside the context of man. So, she is good regardless of her interaction with men IF she espouses the principles you laid out.
For some reason, I don't think females would agree that a man can be "good" if he has all the principles you espouse and yet cheats on his woman. Basically, a man's "goodness" will eventually be tied to his treatment of woman at some point in the deductive process.
I just find that to be funny.
Peace