Yup. The guy who was just selling ggg/Lemiuex on ppv has a problem with Floyd/Berto.
Talking about himself moving up to middleweight when he is a bigger guy than Floyd. Putting all of the blame on Floyd for the Pacman fight not happening 5 years ago when most of the blame goes on the guy who was over random testing. Margarito ain't shyt but a cheating bum fukk him I'll give him Punisher though. The rest of this shyt is him spilling his feelings in the air Floyd has been fighting the same way for a long time if anyone expecting something different for Floyd/Manny that's on them. Should the blame go to the guy who fighting the same style for how many years now or the "exciting fighter" ?
And @ Oscar of all people talking about someone's legacy
That Salt
Oscar stay talking shyt about Floyd. fukk outta hereHe should be when Floyd pops up outta nowhere saying: "You gotta realize this, we all know Oscar De La Hoya owns the Ring Magazine. That shows you; he has no fighters but Canelo. Basically, it's like he's trying to steal her from Dana White. Richard Shaefer, he built Golden Boy from the ground up, helped them make tons and tons of money, and what did this guy do? This is real talk, how can Canelo or any fighter hold their head up high and say, 'You know what? I'm proud for Oscar, a guy that dressed in drag and been on coke.' I mean, the world knows this. How can you hold your head up high and say, 'You know what? I'm proud for this person to be my promoter',"
I disagree with all of this... except the GGG/Lemieux thing and that's only becuz I didn't expect it to tank the way it did.
Oscar stay talking shyt about Floyd. fukk outta here
Yeah, he sounds salty. Revisiting the past usually always sounds salty. There is a lot of truth in there and Mayweather fans won't like it.Oh yea...he's definitely salty
Lmfaaao, Oscar has to be on coke again. Weren't you the one pushing for that fight? Weren't you the one rushing that fight? Weren't you the one who told us that Canelo is ready and that you gave him the "blueprint"? Weren't you the one who was confident about Canelo knocking Floyd out? All of a sudden he was too young? How about when Mayweather fought Genaro Hernandez, a guy who was undefeated at 130, at 21 years old and beat him? And there are too many more examples. Canelo beat the best guy in his weight class and got his shot at the best P4P, but now he was too young? Wouldn't you be saying Floyd ducked him if he didn't fight him? But it's all after they get taken to school, they're either too young or too old!
Took From FB
I was like when I read that.Did that guy just compare young Canelo fighting Floyd Mayweather.....to young Floyd Mayweather fighting GENARO HERNANDEZ?????????
Yeah, he sounds salty. Revisiting the past usually always sounds salty. There is a lot of truth in there and Mayweather fans won't like it.
ODH just did it in a more aggressive and demeaning way than the boxing writers do. The truth is Floyd is an all-time great and he will be remembered as such and ODH knows this. His point is true in that Floyd won't go down as having a great resume compared to the other historically great fighters because he didn't fight most top level fighters in their prime and did take a more cautious career path (without every blatantly ducking anyone). Floyd's one chance to erase that was a fight vs. Pacquiao while both were in their primes. Now Floyd shouldn't carry the whole burden, there is plenty of blame to go around, but it happened. Now when you look back at Floyd's career there is usually two career defining fights: his fight vs. ODH which built him into a PPV star, and Corrales, as many view that as his greatest performance ever.
There will always be criticism over Floyd and his fear of losing his "O". To casuals, losing a fight is a big deal; to historians, losing a fight often times can elevate your historical perception because it likely was vs. another excellent fighter. This is where ODH wins. Off of just wins and losses as numbers, most casuals won't be impressed by ODH. Do the real digging and see who he fought and ODH will always be viewed with more reverence than many fighters who had better records because he fought the best of the best for a long time.
Now all of this wasn't Floyd's fault. He didn't fight in a time period where the competition was quite as good as when ODH was in his prime. But there were opportunities to build a wall against that argument and for various reasons certain fights didn't happen. Floyd is still an all time great.
nikka you only doing this because he shytted on Broner.... I see you nikkaAnd vice versa. Let's not pretend like Floyd didn't start randomly throwing shots at The Snowman first
Who are you?
I noticed that the only time you're in here is when it is something Floyd related, which to me means you need to stay the fukk out. Dead ass serious. You have no knowledge of the sport just a Floydie. Kinda like @Ed MOTHERfukkING G
Where the fukk you been? Didn't Floyd start this?
Did that guy just compare young Canelo fighting Floyd Mayweather.....to young Floyd Mayweather fighting GENARO HERNANDEZ?????????
Yeah, he sounds salty. Revisiting the past usually always sounds salty. There is a lot of truth in there and Mayweather fans won't like it.
ODH just did it in a more aggressive and demeaning way than the boxing writers do. The truth is Floyd is an all-time great and he will be remembered as such and ODH knows this. His point is true in that Floyd won't go down as having a great resume compared to the other historically great fighters because he didn't fight most top level fighters in their prime and did take a more cautious career path (without every blatantly ducking anyone). Floyd's one chance to erase that was a fight vs. Pacquiao while both were in their primes. Now Floyd shouldn't carry the whole burden, there is plenty of blame to go around, but it happened. Now when you look back at Floyd's career there is usually two career defining fights: his fight vs. ODH which built him into a PPV star, and Corrales, as many view that as his greatest performance ever.
There will always be criticism over Floyd and his fear of losing his "O". To casuals, losing a fight is a big deal; to historians, losing a fight often times can elevate your historical perception because it likely was vs. another excellent fighter. This is where ODH wins. Off of just wins and losses as numbers, most casuals won't be impressed by ODH. Do the real digging and see who he fought and ODH will always be viewed with more reverence than many fighters who had better records because he fought the best of the best for a long time.
Now all of this wasn't Floyd's fault. He didn't fight in a time period where the competition was quite as good as when ODH was in his prime. But there were opportunities to build a wall against that argument and for various reasons certain fights didn't happen. Floyd is still an all time great.
Who are you?