This is a fukking 97 G Stan typing this shyt brehs. What the fukk ? Do you neggas have any shame ?
You talking about neggas fighting great competition? Negga Floyd at 21 had a better fukking resume than 97G at Larry Holmes Gardens prep center age.
Dawg you the last one to come here and talk shot about Floyd not taking risks.
Breh, your hating has been going crazy lately. I have been trying to give you leads into conversations here because you clearly know something about boxing and have connections into boxing that most here don't have. You could be posting really insightful stuff that benefits us all.
But that was just
breh. Not once did I mention GGG and not once have I ever proclaimed GGG an all time great, but you have to find a way to work that shyt in. Yeah I am a GGG fan and he is my current favorite fighter to watch...so what? Everybody else here seems to have fun hating on GGG and we do our thing talking trash back and forth over our stan sets, but GGG seems to really bother you.
To clarify, let me break it down: I'm not comparing GGG because I don't think Floyd and him are in the same league. GGG is the best fighter currently at 160, but the competition is historically not very good and we are a long ways from even determining GGG's legacy. Even with that, GGG will never accomplish what Floyd has. I may not be a Mayweather stan and disagree with how he handles himself outside the ring, but I always give dude his respect in the ring. He is the best fighter of the last 15 years and will go down as an ATG. I have never contradicted that. When we talk about ATG, I mean other ATG fighters (Ali, SRR, SRL, Hagler, etc.), that is whose legacy Floyd's is compared against. He is past comparing this current generation. Floyd is the best of this current generation. Floyd is now at the point of deservedly having comparisons to all time great fighters.
My entire point is that it is entirely possible that Floyd's legacy may find faults in opponents, not how he fought, since he was virtually flawless in the ring.
@krackdagawd point is entirely valid and very possible that time makes Mayweather look better and questions about who he fought and when he fought them starts to fade and historically we revere in Floyd's accomplishments. I can buy that. He had a great point regarding SRL. All I am doing is pointing out that if we are to point out one flaw in Floyd's career (an ATG one at that) then that is where I assume most people would look. It seems to be where the criticism comes from now...20 years from now, I don't know how it will be viewed (the same, differently).
Come on breh, I know you have intelligent, insightful commentary inside of you. We don't need to drag it down to the usual levels that occur in a Floyd thread.