D'Angelo Russell traded to the Nets for Brook Lopez & 27th pick

CantStop

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,392
Reputation
8,835
Daps
204,573
It's a bad move to me, I liked what the Lakers were doing by going young and trying to develop their core through the draft. This is right back to square 1 where they were obsessed with getting big names rather than letting it grow.


The only player you know that I didn't like was Randle, outside of that I liked Russell, Ingram and I thought Ball / Russell / Ingram would be a great foundation to work with because it would have gotten Russell off the ball a lot more with a willing passer next to him.
It's not back to square 1 because from all indications, the perception about the Lakers have significantly changed since change of management. Teams don't want by building through the draft. Even GS traded Monta to take that next step. How do you expect to acquire free agents and big names if you don't have cap?
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,136
Daps
279,720
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
It's not back to square 1 because from all indications, the perception about the Lakers have significantly changed since change of management. Teams don't want by building through the draft. Even GS traded Monta to take that next step. How do you expect to acquire free agents and big names if you don't have cap?


The Warriors were built through the draft, 3 of their 4 all-stars were drafted by them, they also put a working team out on the floor before they started pursing free agents. They traded Monta because they needed a center and already knew what he was, not to get more capspace.
 

ahomeplateslugger

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
7,910
Reputation
841
Daps
16,453
this is a win for both teams imo. DLo showed a lot of potential to be a manu type level player but pairing him with lonzo and ingram would've been a defensive disaster. plus dumping mozgov's contract was huge and if they get PG13 it would be worth it.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
44,026
Reputation
2,191
Daps
129,103
It's not back to square 1 because from all indications, the perception about the Lakers have significantly changed since change of management. Teams don't want by building through the draft. Even GS traded Monta to take that next step. How do you expect to acquire free agents and big names if you don't have cap?
monta was old dlo is what 21 and showing the best promise out of all the lakers prospects. move screams win now to me, yall should have drafted tatum or jackson. told pg13 to eat a dikk
 

O.T.I.S.

Veteran
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
72,439
Reputation
15,098
Daps
279,097
Reppin
The Truth
Breh the media hates D'lo. This should give you pause. ESPN heads are notorious for not knowing shyt
Not them 2 though

And Dangelo was nothing crazy to me... I don't care how many points he scores in 30 minutes or some shyt at his age. He wasn't making anyone better, had leadership issues, could not play defense, and was too immature to be a floor leader.

I wouldn't mind if he stayed but I didn't mind if he got traded. Him and Randle was our biggest tradeable assets. Not we got Randle and 3 first round picks and a Deng contract to dump
 
Top