@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited, why do you condone slavery in the bible?

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Fam. Are you saying its black people's fault for ending up as slaves?

Is this really where you're going?

ARE YOU REALLY TAKING EVERYTHING I POST COMPLETELY WRONG????

Yes, yes you are.


​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Which were slaves

And not under Mosaic Law, but the laws of Egypt.​

So what are we arguing again?

How stupid and sad you look trying to call me out and getting bodied in your own thread......AGAIN!!!!


​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

No, it doesn't actually.

......

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/08/national/08PRIS.html
​

Physical and sexual abuse of prisoners, similar to what has been uncovered in Iraq, takes place in American prisons with little public knowledge or concern, according to corrections officials, inmates and human rights advocates.

And since this is your answer, lets clarify that you think that this justifies it being in the bible?

Sure, just like car accidents, terrorist attacks and births/deaths should be in newspapers and history books.​

 

[Ghost_In_A_Shell]

No one in this thread is justifying slavery as defined 2,000 years AFTER the text was written.​

By defending the text , you condone it.

That's because it wouldn't be in that text. It would be in judicial documents. They actually had courts back then.​

Of the most plausible cases above, two (A, D) are from the Patriarchal period, one reflects Egyptian practice (F), and another the practice of Persian Jews of the Exilic or post-Exilic period (J). From the pre-Exilic period there is a possible case alleged by the Chronicler to have taken place in the time of David (M), one or two other remotely possible cases (G) and (K), the latter from the late pre-Exilic or Exilic period) and the "posthumous adoption" involved in levirate marriage (N). The evidence for adoption in the pre-Exilic period is thus meager. The possibility that adoption was practiced in this period cannot be excluded, especially since contemporary legal documents are lacking. Nevertheless, it seems that if adoption played any role at all in Israelite family institutions, it was an insignificant one. It may be that the tribal consciousness of the Israelites did not favor the creation of artificial family ties and that the practice of polygamy obviated some of the need for adoption. For the post-Exilic per-iod in Palestine there is no reliable evidence for adoption at all.


http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0001_0_00486.html

LOL, I'm a Theological Noncognitivist so I have no doctrine save follow the evidence wherever it goes.

The text doesn't condone slavery as it came to be in Colonial America. That argument is weak and thoroughly refuted by archaeology.

The Constitution of the United States on the other hand..........

I'm so very sorry to bring this up again, but it has been repeatedly brought to your attention some 10 or more dozen quotes from your doctrine

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

ARE YOU REALLY TAKING EVERYTHING I POST COMPLETELY WRONG????

Yes, yes you are.


​

You are ok with slaves in the bible.

Just say so already.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

......

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/08/national/08PRIS.html
​

Sure, just like car accidents, terrorist attacks and births/deaths should be in newspapers and history books.​

We're talking about the bible.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

And not under Mosaic Law, but the laws of Egypt.​

How stupid and sad you look trying to call me out and getting bodied in your own thread......AGAIN!!!!


​

who gives a fukk which law applies to who?

You just said it! You condone slavery in the bible!

 

[Standing on business]

Nobody plays mental gymnastics more than white people and people who explain the bible

 

[Michael9100]

I doubt anyone has a mindset to hear anything justifying slavery.

Are you African-American?

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Are you African-American?

Anything to avoid that slavery question, huh?

 

[Quarterback]

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited does it feel bad to dishonor your ancestors by embracing c00n thoughts?

Every time you cape for the u.s., you dishonor your ancestors and you embrace c00n thoughts.

Hypocrite.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Every time you cape for the u.s., you dishonor your ancestors and you embrace c00n thoughts.

Hypocrite.

Hegemony is different from slavery

 

[Quarterback]

Hegemony is different from slavery

No, c00njabi, Hegemony makes cacs richer, which gives them more power to oppress us. Power which they 100% use.

Your support of cac hegemony is 100x worse than anything @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited has said. It is a reality while slavery is forever dead. You lose.

 

[10:31]

Nobody plays mental gymnastics more than white people and people who explain the bible

I saw this beef coming

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited is confused... Just say you believe breh. nikkas will respect you more

 

[resurrection]

I saw this beef coming

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited is confused... Just say you believe breh. nikkas will respect you more

That's the most annoying part breh.. This dude has been going back and forth with posters for years between and here caping for Christianity, then turning around like "but it ain't like I'm a Christian tho "

Like come on breh