Last edited:
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited, why do you condone slavery in the bible?
- Thread starter ☑︎#VoteDemocrat
- Start date
DonKnock
KPJ Gonna Save Us
Breh for real, I've know some stubborn fuccboys in my life that don't know when to give it up. But this guy takes the cake
Even if he believed what he was saying, how did he not just drop it about 200 posts ago
Quarterback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCOaI06zAvg
Claim trolling when tryin to weasel outta a stupid post, brehsIgnore hyperbole brehs
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,260
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
DonKnock said:
America has more slaves than any Nation on this planet. What's the problem?
Oh, there shouldn't be ANY 'slaves'? I agree, unfortunately, that's not the way the world works....when the text was written originally, or now.
Those who follow the text as authoritative also believe as you & I on that point.....at least those I've spoken to personally.
Oh, there shouldn't be ANY 'slaves'? I agree, unfortunately, that's not the way the world works....when the text was written originally, or now.
Those who follow the text as authoritative also believe as you & I on that point.....at least those I've spoken to personally.
Last edited:
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,260
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
DonKnock said:
You should take your own advice.
DonKnock said:Even if he believed what he was saying, how did he not just drop it about 200 posts ago
Because I absolutely believe what I'm saying. You put FAR more importance on the text than I ever will, but understand far less about it than I do.
Last edited:
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,260
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Cbanks36 said:
Because I need the respect of anonymous people on the Internet in order to be fulfilled as a human being............
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,260
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
DarkSkinSamurai said:nikkas in here really defending slavery
No one is defending 'slavery', i.e. 'chattel slavery/indentured servitude'. Made that point clear a while back, but no one noticed.
People too caught-up in emotions due to a term who's meaning has changed over the course of 3,000+ years.
I'll make it easy for you to comprehend: No one in their right mind, today, would refer to the President's Cabinet members as 'slaves', but that WOULD be how they were referred to in the ANE kingdoms.
People too caught-up in emotions due to a term who's meaning has changed over the course of 3,000+ years.
I'll make it easy for you to comprehend: No one in their right mind, today, would refer to the President's Cabinet members as 'slaves', but that WOULD be how they were referred to in the ANE kingdoms.
Last edited:
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,260
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Cbanks36 said:
Be mad that your 'argument' (LOL) is pure emotion devoid of logic....which was the intended purpose of the O/P that YOU fell for.
Last edited:
GetInTheTruck
Member
@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited getting worked in here I see.
For the record I think you are a knowledgeable guy but this isn't an argument you were ever gonna win, you should have left it alone. I myself used to defend the slavery in the Bible and islamic tradition, but not anymore. Those semetic religions are barbaric and designed for barbarians. High thinking individuals need not apply.
For the record I think you are a knowledgeable guy but this isn't an argument you were ever gonna win, you should have left it alone. I myself used to defend the slavery in the Bible and islamic tradition, but not anymore. Those semetic religions are barbaric and designed for barbarians. High thinking individuals need not apply.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,260
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
GetInTheTruck said:
I already 'won' with my first post. The rest is just fodder.
People like to feel 'superior' to the ancients, but the ancients were far more intelligent and resourceful than we give them credit for.
Barbarian, or not, makes no difference. They created civilization and we've just improved on their blueprints.
Now, I'm going through the Bhagavad Gita. Pretty interesting so far.
People like to feel 'superior' to the ancients, but the ancients were far more intelligent and resourceful than we give them credit for.
Barbarian, or not, makes no difference. They created civilization and we've just improved on their blueprints.
Now, I'm going through the Bhagavad Gita. Pretty interesting so far.
GetInTheTruck
Member
I definitely agree with that.
You should take your own advice.
Because I absolutely believe what I'm saying. You put FAR more importance on the text than I ever will, but understand far less about it than I do.
This is the EPITOME of a smart-dumb nikka statement
Kinda like the god of the bible?Because I need the respect of anonymous people on the Internet in order to be fulfilled as a human being............
