Creh smokes another creh on cam

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Right. I don’t watch sports, I’m not a “n—ka” and don’t use the word. But you’re pretending to be black with a racist white username who has no problem dropping hard N-ER words all over this forum under the guise of “talking sports”. Fuk all the way outta here.

Whatever nikka..... None of these so called posts(edited maybe) point to me being white... it actually points to the opposite....... but I know your insanity has to play itself out.....

 

[Lord Beasley]

different from Rittenhouse... he was on his own property, asked duke to leave with the Iron on him, duke tried to take said firearm and got dropped on camera. looks like an acquittal to me

 

[Absolut]

different from Rittenhouse... he was on his own property, asked duke to leave with the Iron on him, duke tried to take said firearm and got dropped on camera. looks like an acquittal to me

A guy tried to compare this to rittenhouse, Aubrey, and Bryant cases like they are all similar other than all of those being shooting deaths, there’s zero similarity. there’s also absolutely zero chance they get 12 Texas jurors to agree this is murder even if they actually charge him now that this is viral

 

[franknitty711]

Gun should have never come out. Dude was outsized and thought it was a good idea....

 

[heart]

Seemed liked the guy who got shot was towering over the shooter, and had he not gotten the gun, he probably would've beat him down. I think it comes down to two things:

1. by court orders did the guy have a right to be there to pick up his son.
2. KYLE fired one warning shot when his life was not in danger, the guy reached for the gun and then Kyle stepped back several feet and then shot, kinda a shade of grey on self defense

My only question is, how come the guy who got shot didn't meet the baby mom with his son at a neutral place? Seems like she was playing games and dude got frustrated and came over..

Its Easy to play monday morning QB but dude shouldve just waited until the cops came. And its also asinine that the baby mom didn't have any reaction to him getting shot when she instigated the whole thing. This happens a lot.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Quote me. Because I found the thread. I said he should get manslaughter in the least fukking goofball

'Stand your ground' killer Michael Drejka sentenced to 20 years in slaying over parking space

That wasn't your main comment on the issue, your first statement was much longer and you defended him using his weapon at three different points and then compared it to another situation that you suggested was also justified:

"the other guy was also clearly stepping forward after the shove until the guy reaches for his weapon and he steps back. so its clearly a guess whether he was being done physical"

"keep your hands to yourself especially in a state where a law is on the books saying you can be shot if you physically assault someone with no repercussions"

"so according to @Nicole0416 logic, this guy is also supposed to just stand there and wait until a situation becomes life or death before using his weapon?"

Pretty much all there is to be said. this a$$hole was just waiting for someone to give him the opening to pull his weapon and use it. the other guy was also clearly stepping forward after the shove until the guy reaches for the weapon and he steps back. so its clearly a guess whether he was done being physical.

a) dont be an a$$hole and park in a handicapped spot
b) its not a citizens job to police a parking lot
c) keep your hands to yourself. you never know whos packing heat during a petty argument
d) keep your hands to yourself especially in a state where a law is on the books saying you can be shot if you physically assault someone with no repercussions.



so according to @Nicole0416 logic, this guy is also supposed to just stand there and wait until a situation becomes life or death before using his weapon?

And I note you didn't even challenge the other assertion. You are heavy about defending shooters even/especially when they the police:

They really don’t get it wrong all that often in relation to the actual number of officer involved shooting there are.

Sticking up for these absolute deadbeat losers harming and threatening folks for what little they have Hope every one of those strongarm thieves gets shot at and bleeds out slow

There’s been a ton of officer involved shootings in Vegas alone this year where the suspect didn’t even fire a shot at an officer. Should they not have fired on these guys

He shot at the robber while the altercation was ongoing. The suspect then fled in a vehicle. Who says he shot at a fleeing vehicle? Only unfortunate part of the story is his aim sucked

Yet you just did, again. He refused to put his arms up, then put only one up, then pulled the other out sideways like he was reaching. You are talking Trayvon martin, aurora theater shootings, but not shifting the discussion. shyts tired on here

Dunno any department that trains anyone to play a guessing game when someone is pointing a metal object a cops way at close range. If you want to act like you truly expect the vast majority cops to not open fire in this situation then you can keep pretending. I would never point a metal object at a cop. You know why? Because I’m extremely likely to be shot

Can’t even say they should have shot the white guy without someone getting bent out of shape eat a dikk

There’s no basically in my stance. They aren’t there to play a guessing game if he’s wielding a metal showerhead like a gun or if its a real gun. If he’s pointing it at people as seen in the THREE photos already released, Where’s the what Ifs? He’s obviously wielding it in a fashion to make people think he has a gun, and it was treated as such when they shot back

She was an immediate lethal threat in contact with someone. You’re wondering why lethal force was used? If someone is attacking you with a knife, you would hope someone armed with a gun and a taser will do more to help you than fire off a taser before your ass gets sliced

This motherfukker was running up and down the street threatening folks with what he wanted them to think was a weapon. I don’t give a rats ass about what it turned out to be, because if he was in my face with that thing I’d assume it was a gun as wel and would respond as so, which is why I’m perfectly fine with him being gunned down when he pointed that at plain clothes armed cops. Pointing it at kids and shyt. As I’ve said several times, equating this moronic behavior with the many other sickening police killing and is absurd. Why the fukk is anyone trying to defend this guys actions? And all y’all cac this asswipes can eat my dikk

Of course there’s no comparison you asswipe. I said it’s not even close to the same situation. This is a 100% justifiable shooting and If you don’t like that opinion you can shove it up your ass. Cac rhetoric. Eat a dikk. Lol @ making the comparison to Tamir rice, being told it’s not a reasonable comparison, and then being mad

Bushed for what? Saying this shooting is justified while everyone else is on some race shyt? Can’t argue it directly, so strawmen , what abouts, and cac this cac that are the responses? Then just try to silence the opposing viewpoint? Then realize that’s what right wingers do in arguments and see that you’re doing the same? Then realize why issues get nowhere in this country?

That’s a total assumption. I posted 5 non black guys shot/killed in Vegas this year alone that didn’t fire a shot in a cops direction. Just another straw man argument. I have zero issue with any of em. Do you?

 

[Dzali OG]

Warning shots are illegal even in pro gun states which it seems that first shot was

People keep ignoring this.

He fired a warning shot.

Remember ol girl from Florida who got 25 years for firing a warning shot as she was fighting with her husband?

Only reason he won't go to prison is if he's plugged in and this case doesn't gain traction.

Out of spite I would send case law to the dead guys son and get his mom's boyfriend locked up.

 

[Gold]

I'll say this again.

- Go to someone elses house
- Threaten to kill them
- Refuse to leave
- When they bring a gun out and ask to you to leave again, try to take the gun from them
- Threaten to kill them again.

I garuntee you gonna end up dead, and whoever killed you gonna go back to eating oatmeal and watching SportsCenter.


So many people getting laid to rest cuz their pride is too much.
Forgot about the ins-and-outs of the legal system for a second.

Just think about living instead

 

[Absolut]

That wasn't your main comment on the issue, your first statement was much longer and you defended him using his weapon at three different points and then compared it to another situation that you suggested was also justified:

"the other guy was also clearly stepping forward after the shove until the guy reaches for his weapon and he steps back. so its clearly a guess whether he was being done physical"

"keep your hands to yourself especially in a state where a law is on the books saying you can be shot if you physically assault someone with no repercussions"

"so according to @Nicole0416 logic, this guy is also supposed to just stand there and wait until a situation becomes life or death before using his weapon?"



And I note you didn't even challenge the other assertion. You are heavy about defending shooters even/especially when they the police:

I defend shootings which are justified, yes. What’s to challenge? At no point did I defend the guy in the parking lot, as I stated he would get manslaughter at the worst because the guy was backing up, and he was just looking for a reason to use his weapon. You cannot read though, evidently.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Whatever nikka..... None of these so called posts(edited maybe) point to me being white... it actually points to the opposite....... but I know your insanity has to play itself out.....

None of those posts of yours using the n- er are edited, you lying white bytch. You got caught so shut the fuk up. Call a mod in here to verify the authenticity or will screenshots of your posts suffice? Now go run along and change your username AGAIN, like you did the last 4 times you were caught up in a web of your own creation, white boy.

Dumb m’fer, I see you changed up your energy real fukkin quick from all that paragraph posting, passive positioning to stammering and backtracking with the “edited maybe” - I wish you would lie and say you didn’t type that up. Bytch I’m not stupid enough to not keep a paper trail on you bytchmade n-er word purveyors, to prove how you get down - your people are known liars. I don’t need to lie for what you brought on yourself, damn right, I’m coming with proof to back up what I say.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

A guy tried to compare this to rittenhouse, Aubrey, and Bryant cases like they are all similar other than all of those being shooting deaths, there’s zero similarity. there’s also absolutely zero chance they get 12 Texas jurors to agree this is murder even if they actually charge him now that this is viral

I'm just trying to follow the same rules y'all make up. Those of you saying that he was justified to kill because the guy reached for his gun AFTER he fired a shot are using the exact same excuse that Rittenhouse used, the exact same excuse that Arbury's killers used. So is reaching for the gun of a guy who has already demonstrated evil intent a justifiable reason to kill someone or no?

Then y'all are claiming that even the first shot is justified cause the guy was on his property and "made threats", even though he didn't make those threats until AFTER the gun was pulled. Well, Bryant was on her own property and those other girls had a knife and made threats against her, can she defend herself on her own property or not?

I'm consistent - I don't think anyone should ever be the first one to use lethal force. I think Bryant was in the wrong even though she was on her own property and those others had made threats. I think Arbury's killers, Rittenhouse, and this guy were all in the wrong even though someone tried to grab their guns. THEY were the ones who made it a lethal situation in the first place.

At three different points in the video, the motherfukker with the gun escalated the situation to make it more lethal. He had no need to get the gun in the first place, he had no need to fire the first shot, and he had no need to fire the deadly shots. His life was not in danger at ANY of those moments, so it was completely unnecessary to introduce lethal force.

But some of y'all will just for a gun in Amerikkka when no other developed nation on Earth would be defending this bullshyt.

 

[Absolut]

I'm just trying to follow the same rules y'all make up. Those of you saying that he was justified to kill because the guy reached for his gun AFTER he fired a shot are using the exact same excuse that Rittenhouse used, the exact same excuse that Arbury's killers used. So is reaching for the gun of a guy who has already demonstrated evil intent a justifiable reason to kill someone or no?

Then y'all are claiming that even the first shot is justified cause the guy was on his property and "made threats", even though he didn't make those threats until AFTER the gun was pulled. Well, Bryant was on her own property and those other girls had a knife and made threats against her, can she defend herself on her own property or not?

I'm consistent - I don't think anyone should ever be the first one to use lethal force. I think Bryant was in the wrong even though she was on her own property and those others had made threats. I think Arbury's killers, Rittenhouse, and this guy were all in the wrong even though someone tried to grab their guns. THEY were the ones who made it a lethal situation in the first place.

At three different points in the video, the motherfukker with the gun escalated the situation to make it more lethal. He had no need to get the gun in the first place, he had no need to fire the first shot, and he had no need to fire the deadly shots. His life was not in danger at ANY of those moments, so it was completely unnecessary to introduce lethal force.

But some of y'all will just for a gun in Amerikkka when no other developed nation on Earth would be defending this bullshyt.

He was justified to kill when the man approached him saying he would take his gun and use it on him, on his property. It’s as simple as that. I never mentioned anything about grabbing the weapon. It’s moot after the approach and verbal death threat

 

[Sex Luthor]

Its close enough to where the case can go either way. All this debating in this thread is pointless

We know they aren't black so it's even more pointless bc he's gonna get a slap on the wrist, if he even gets that

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I defend shootings which are justified, yes. What’s to challenge? At no point did I defend the guy in the parking lot, as I stated he would get manslaughter at the worst because the guy was backing up, and he was just looking for a reason to use his weapon. You cannot read though, evidently.

You don't just defend "shootings that are justified", you explicitly defend shootings more generally.

They really don’t get it wrong all that often in relation to the actual number of officer involved shooting there are.

You sound bloodthirsty.

Sticking up for these absolute deadbeat losers harming and threatening folks for what little they have Hope every one of those strongarm thieves gets shot at and bleeds out slow

And regarding Markeis McGlockton's death you didn't say jack shyt about manslaughter in that statement I quoted, you made CLEAR that you were defending his killer.

the other guy was also clearly stepping forward after the shove until the guy reaches for the weapon and he steps back. so its clearly a guess whether he was done being physical.

a) dont be an a$$hole and park in a handicapped spot
b) its not a citizens job to police a parking lot
c) keep your hands to yourself. you never know whos packing heat during a petty argument
d) keep your hands to yourself especially in a state where a law is on the books saying you can be shot if you physically assault someone with no repercussions.



so according to @Nicole0416 logic, this guy is also supposed to just stand there and wait until a situation becomes life or death before using his weapon?

"the other guy was also clearly stepping forward after the shove until the guy reaches for his weapon and he steps back. so its clearly a guess whether he was being done physical"

"keep your hands to yourself especially in a state where a law is on the books saying you can be shot if you physically assault someone with no repercussions"

"so according to @Nicole0416 logic, this guy is also supposed to just stand there and wait until a situation becomes life or death before using his weapon?"


That was your main comment on the issue, and you're making all sorts of justifications without even bringing up repercussions for the shooter. The short aside you made about manslaughter wasn't even until a completely different later comment.

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

Whatever nikka..... None of these so called posts(edited maybe) point to me being white... it actually points to the opposite....... but I know your insanity has to play itself out.....

Are you denying that you ever used the N- ER word on those multiple quotes that I posted?

No one can edit your original posts but you. I dare you to fukkin lie and say that you didn’t post those comments. I see you went silent - call in a MOD to verify if any of your original posts were edited by a poster other than YOU.