Creh smokes another creh on cam

KingFreeman

Barely-Known Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Messages
3,018
Reputation
410
Daps
9,961
Reppin
the 254
Knowing how the Kyle Rittenhouse situation went down, why the fukk would green shirt pull up to dude's house unarmed in goddamn Lubbock, Texas?:stopitslime:.
Its been a while since I've seen so many L's: Green shirt being old as hell and having a sociopath babymother getting dikked down by a 20 year old, the escalation, and the response after.

They going to have to pass some laws, because people going to peep Rittenhouse and be like "fukk it", and pull up to situations ready to blast away. Stupid ass entitled parts of this country.
 

Wildin

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
21,033
Reputation
6,457
Daps
64,489
I think CAC's believe their privilege can stop bullets..... :mjgrin:

They are unless the ammo is
black-ammo-productlinethumb.png


If you're a STEP parent then STEP your bytch ass aside when the biological parents are working. Unless they start physically hitting each other, you have no rights. Don't matter if you married into the family, don't matter if you pay the bills.

What does Kyle expect to happen now? Even if he walks the kid don't love him, don't even like him, and mom obviously loves and needs her kid...it's a losing situation.

Thirdly, what the hell is wrong with white people, find one video of black people shooting each other, killing each other and not reacting at all. No screaming and hollaring, no running away, shyt I've seen shootings where they even laughed at the person who got shot, this one, they didn't even acknowledge or care and it was like 3 people. That's some cold calculated calloused shyt right there. How many shootings do you have to see or be involved in or how much music, or tv, videogames do you have to see or hear or just how much hate do you have to have to not even blink an eye? Nobody was in shock either.

This is why I say once again. White lives don't matter, white people don't care about other white people.
 

Sex Luthor

I'm like kryptonite to these thots
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
14,110
Reputation
2,780
Daps
55,689
Reppin
NOLA
someone tells you to leave their property and you don't, its not their fault if you unarmed and still want to flex your ego.

its texas too :francis:

verbal
display
even a warning shot
then the guy declares he's gonna and take the gun and shoot dude telling him to leave?

i'd be shocked if they even kept that kind of shyt on file. the detached bytch in the car didn't even stutter after egging the whole thing on either :unimpressed: gotta choose better
What's crazy is that nobody tripped about it really.
 

Samori Toure

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 23, 2015
Messages
19,995
Reputation
6,251
Daps
100,191
man your credibility was shot once you compared this to Trayvon Martin

but for anyone else wondering:

1)clearly, showing up to pick up your son for a court ordered visit does not give you the right to conduct yourself however you want on someone else's property with immunity from being asked to leave.

2)as for when a person becomes a trespasser:
(a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains on or in property, including an aircraft or other vehicle, of another without effective consent or he enters or remains in a building of another without effective consent and he:
(1) had notice that the entry was forbidden; or
(2) received notice to depart but failed to do so.
(b) For purposes of this section:
(2) “Notice” means:
(A) oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;


dude was told to leave by someone who was either the owner or had apparent authority to act for the owner

3)as for when you can remove them forcibly:
Sec. 9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.

dude wasn't leaving and was being hostile


everything after that is straightforward self defense - dude threatened to take the gun and use it on him, and then rushed him and grabbed the gun. if you can't understand this, I advise you not to get mad on anyone else's property

I am not going to read your nonsensical novel, because you clearly don't understand a nuanced point of view. I will just leave you with this point of view. The victim in the video was not a trespasser you big dummy. He was clearly invited to the place. It is not clear if the invitation was expressed or implied, but it is clear that the ex-wife and her new husband expected him and that he was not a trespasser.

So the statute you cited is for a trespasser, not for an invitee which means that your statute does not apply unless you can first establish that the person's invitee status was revoked and that he entered the status as a trespasser. Even if the victim then entered into trespass status you still have to show that he posed so kind of unlawful threat to you or someone on your property, because you still have to show you are justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary... . Nothing in that video warranted the killer introducing deadly force in that situatin.
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,182
Reputation
10,624
Daps
122,038
That bytch is foul...

This is a hard one, dude had a right to pick his son up, baby moms was playing games. But ultimately he was told that his son was not there and was asked to leave but wanted to stay and argue. Kyle shouldn't have went and got the gun, but it's Texas and dude tried to grab the gun after making it clear what he would have done if he took it.

Ls all around.

Yeah this is one situation where everybody lost, can't even say such and such was in the wrong.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,843
Reppin
the ether
That's murder :hubie:. Don't see how you defend this. So if the son is not here why the bytch kept the argument going and going and going. If he is suppose to get him at 3:15, thats whats suppose to happen but the idiot wants to be petty and not give him his son. I understand why he is upset.

Absolutely murder and motherfukkers defending it are on some bullshyt. The guy who got murked didn't "threaten" anyone with physical violence, he said he was going to subpoena them. You can't threaten someone with a gun just because they say they're gonna follow a legal process, you can't fire a shot when he hasn't posed any threat to you, and you can't shoot them in clear space when they're standing there with their hands at their side and aren't an immediate threat to you.

Texas has broad-ass laws that say you can brandish a gun in defense of your life, other's lives, or your property...but which of those three did the guy who got shot pose a threat to? He didn't once threaten to hurt anyone or to take or damage any property until the perp pulled a gun on him.

Then again, it's Texas, and some folk here want that wild wild west shyt exactly like certain white Texans do. Not to mention shooter is the leader of the "Lubbock 2nd Amendment Association" or some shyt so you know they get turned on by the thought of getting to take another's life with a gun.
 

Strapped

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
43,479
Reputation
1,551
Daps
53,492
Reppin
404
:dwillhuh: majority of this thread didn't hear the dude say "i'll take it that out of your hands and use it on you" before he tussled with dude holding the gun? that's NOT something you can gloss over especially since he made move for it right after he said it


the second he said that shyt he set himself up for the L. period.

If the cops were already coming he could've posted up by the car and waited 20 minutes max. situation coulda got resolved and if he still wanted to fight dude he could've saved it for another day, instead he thought his rage was gonna make him invulnerable to bullets :snoop: dude just shot the ground in front of you and the next thing you do is try and toss him around, and DON'T take the gun from him? yea your dumbass deserves to get shot
You forgetting dude did not have a gun & was only arguing with the girl , she could have easily went inside & locked the fuxing door & left the baby daddy outside . Dude escalated the situation by bringing a gun out
 

bzb

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
3,910
Reputation
2,524
Daps
21,796
what passes as "legal" doesn't necessarily mean warranted.

imo that's a weak shoot. no need to get the gat, much less shoot the guy. i support the 2nd amendment, but that was the reaction of a soft little man. pepper spray or taze the guy. maybe even Louisville slugger upside his head or ribs, but killing him wasn't necessary.

this country is making it ok for people to resolve petty disputes with a homicide. lame shyt.
 
Top