Creationists butthurt as a result of Dr Pepper ad

[Street Knowledge]

all the evidence i need is in museums, anthropological labs, archaeological sites, and science textbooks around the world. and unlike you, my beliefs are open to change as new evidence is discovered. i don't wholeheartedly put my faith into something with absolutely no proof.

how about you get back to me when you get a single tangible shred of evidence to prove god created the world in seven days. or maybe where the garden of eden is.

don't reply cuz i know u can't

This

 

[88m3]

lulz I think we might need to have a middle school science thread soon

 

[Tom]

Who u think taught u to smoke trees?


who u think brought u the oldies?


the D.O.Cs, Ice Cubes and Eazy E's


The Snoop D.O. double G


and the group that said muthafuk the Police

 

[protestor]

dumbass

Until now, the whale series went something like this:

"Pakicetids (fully terrestrial): ~50 mya
Ambulocetids (semi-aquatic): 49 mya
Remingtonocetids (semi-aquatic): 49 mya
Rodhocetus (a Protocetid, semi-aquatic): 47 mya
Basilosaurids (fully aquatic): 40 mya"

So under the previous timeline, Darwinian biologists didn't have to worry about accounting for the origin of fully aquatic whales until about 40 mya. This new find pushes fully aquatic whales back to 49 mya. Now the timeline looks something like this:

"Pakicetids (fully terrestrial): ~50 mya
New Fossil Jawbone (fully aquatic whale): 49 mya
Ambulocetids (semi-aquatic): 49 mya
Remingtonocetids (semi-aquatic): 49 mya
Rodhocetus (a Protocetid, semi-aquatic): 47 mya
Basilosaurids (fully aquatic): 40 mya"

Discovery of "Oldest Fully Aquatic Whale" Fossil Throws a Major Bone into Whale Evolution Story - Evolution News & Views

look here, it literally went from a tiger to whale in 1 million years. next time one of you decide to put a cute chart make sure its not outdated, tigers to whales. Ha!

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

i dont think i ever seen so many caped crusaders of evolution swoop down like this as if a signal in the sky was lit up


there was a option to explain or leave my question alone and now your complaining that the question is to hard if you scared go to church friends

dirty jerz your stupid ass wouldn't understand evolution if Darwin himself came back to life like jesus to explain it to you. I'm sure its already been explained and broken down to you hundreds of times on KTL. If you don't believe that a human cannot breathe the "air" in space then you're NEVER going to believe in evolution, ironically and paradoxically you believe in God.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

dirty jerz your stupid ass wouldn't understand evolution if Darwin himself came back to life like jesus to explain it to you. I'm sure its already been explained and broken down to you hundreds of times on KTL. If you don't believe that a human cannot breathe the "air" in space then you're NEVER going to believe in evolution, ironically and paradoxically you believe in God.

your using of a hypothetical discussion to discredit is useless here


is this what the brains of HL have come to when given a chance to show and prove? pathetic

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

your using of a hypothetical discussion to discredit is useless here


is this what the brains of HL have come to when given a chance to show and prove? pathetic

you really expect us to waste time explaining something to someone who refuses to believe in it despite the overwhelming evidence to support it?

Backfire effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

you have google if you really want it explained to you

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

you did say artificial selection.

you read that wrong but i should have spaced out that part better

show me an animal morphing into a different animal /

and not a sub species through artificial selection

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

you read that wrong but i should have spaced out that part better

dude do you understand how fukking stupid it is to say microevolution is real but macroevolution is not? macroevolution is just microevolution over a very very long period of time. Its all evolution. It takes so long for one animal to "morph"(your stupid words, not mine) into another animal. I can't just post a GIF of this happening.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

you really expect us to waste time explaining something to someone who refuses to believe in it despite the overwhelming evidence to support it?

Backfire effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

you have google if you really want it explained to you

oh thats where your wrong making this all about me


you seem to have missed the part where i said prove to everyone because we are teaching and learning in this sub forum called higher learning


maybe you need to get a better reading comprehension before you question anything else

or maybe the forum needs a new name

 

[zerozero]

Here's one (of literally hundreds).......

Transcript: Rowan Williams interview | World news | guardian.co.uk

great quote, that "category mistake" part is what I was trying to get at too with "religion is another type of thought process."

the only reason evolution is a threat to a theological viewpoint is if you want to read genesis as material fact and make it compete alongside other empirical facts. but in that case you're also dragging it into a material realm. This guy you quoted points out that it also kinda reduces faith.

 

[Sensitive Blake Griffin]

Why don't you require the same burden of proof for your religious views as you do for your anti-science views? I mean seriously, you went so far as to say you wont believe the air in space isn't breathable until you see a SAMPLE of the air from space. You're taking things to absurd levels, but then you just happily accept God as fact and whatever stupid ass religion you subscribe to.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You said the overwhelming majority of theists think creationism is heretical. A theist is just someone who believes in God. Did you mean Christian theologians?

I actually said 'almost' heretical. Christian, Muslim, Jew, etc. A very small minority of theists are in-favor of 'Creationism'. Most are not and view it as a threat to theism since they don't even posit a 'G-d' as the 'Creator'.....

As used in the context of creation-science as defined by Section 4 of Act 590, the terms or concepts of "creation" and "creator" are not inherently religious terms or concepts. In this sense, the term "creator" means only some entity with power, intelligence and a sense of design. Creation science does not require a creator who has a personality, who has the attributes of love, compassion, justice and so on which are ordinarily attributed to a deity. Indeed, the creation-science model does not require that the creator still be in existence.

~McLean vs. Arkansas trial transcript, pgs. 186-187, 1981.

**Re-Unsubscribes**

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

dude do you understand how fukking stupid it is to say microevolution is real but macroevolution is not? macroevolution is just microevolution over a very very long period of time. Its all evolution. It takes so long for one animal to "morph"(your stupid words, not mine) into another animal. I can't just post a GIF of this happening.

no "dude" what i see here is we can prove animals adapt depending on the circumstance but we cannot prove that mouse trying to get your trash to eat is going to transform into a racc00n to make it easier to get and eat trash and defend itself and then when better traps are made for racc00ns they are going to turn into eagles and fly away because its easier to find food without humans trapping them


you cant post a GIF because it doesnt exist from the visual proof we have


just like that post a couple posts up we had a chart put in this thread about tigers turning into whales over millions of years of evolution then turn around and find new evidence that fully marine whales already existed around the same time not 10 million years later

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

Why don't you require the same burden of proof for your religious views as you do for your anti-science views? I mean seriously, you went so far as to say you wont believe the air in space isn't breathable until you see a SAMPLE of the air from space. You're taking things to absurd levels, but then you just happily accept God as fact and whatever stupid ass religion you subscribe to.

lets keep to the topic at hand here instead of branching out to useless information that has nothing to do with evolution

this seems to be a trending way of discussion when people are out of ways to refute a point they cant prove