Grand Conde
Superstar
You are being intectually dishonest. Your argument is useless when it comes to explaining the 'beginning' of anything, because you are unable to explain the creation of the creator.
Creationist offers 10K to anyone who debunk Genesis account in court
- Thread starter valet
- Start date
You are being intectually dishonest. Your argument is useless when it comes to explaining the 'beginning' of anything, because you are unable to explain the creation of the creator.
Breh, I'm NOT religious. And I'm not doubting evolution. I'm simply asking you a question and instead of admitting you don't know you're just going in circles.
Your theory has holes, breh. Huge holes. And it's important to point this out because you're always calling religious people dumb and irrational and all that. I'm simply pointing out how irrational your theory is too.
Johnny Kilroy
79 points in 1 quarter
Those theories don't claim or seek out the answer to that question! Why do you expect them to?!
It's like saying you don't believe in gravity because the theory doesn't tell you where everything came from. Neither the theory of gravity or evolution or the big bang's purpose is to answer that question and it has no bearing on the validity of any of those theories.
Religious texts never claim to be science text books but that never stops atheists from expecting them to be.
And it's a legitimate question. You tell me this, that and the third. Ok, great. But me asking "how" isn't a fair question? I think it's THE MOST IMPORTANT question because that's where the divide takes place.
Atheists aren't the ones who use religious texts as if they are scientific, religious folks doReligious texts never claim to be science text books but that never stops atheists from expecting them to be.
And it's a legitimate question. You tell me this, that and the third. Ok, great. But me asking "how" isn't a fair question? I think it's THE MOST IMPORTANT question because that's where the divide takes place.
I don't give a fukk what you think is important. You clearly don't understand evolution or what a scientific theory is. I can't keep wasting my time with stupid fukks who can't even argue logically and then hide behind the "I'm not religious!!!" excuse.
Even funkdoc isn't this obnoxious and dumb.
I'm done with this thread. All you do is keeping asking where everything came from and claim evolution has "huge holes" because of that. You're a fukking retard. Welcome to my ignore list. You join the prestigious ranks of
Crakface, Da_Eggman, Mowgli, Mr. Somebody, Sierra Mist, Slang, and spoiled. Congratulations.
Those theories don't claim or seek out the answer to that question! Why do you expect them to?!
It's like saying you don't believe in gravity because the theory doesn't tell you where everything came from. Neither the theory of gravity or evolution or the big bang's purpose is to answer that question and it has no bearing on the validity of any of those theories.
I never said I don't believe in the theories of the Big Bang or evolution. They are sound theories and we can see the evidence in ourveveryday lives. The thing is they are not end all be all solutions. As we learn more, they could be changed drastically, or we could learn more that confirms them. Either way I don't agree with disrespecting others beliefs because nobody has the answer at this point. I don't agree with people teaching that evolution is wrong because that's just denying all the evidence that we can see. And I don't agree with people who say evolution is evidence that there is no creator, because evolution doesn't even address a creator.
I never tried to explain a creator. I said none of us can prove/disprove a creator. You can't explain the non-creation of a non-creator so where does that leave us?
Johnny Kilroy
79 points in 1 quarter
Atheists aren't the ones who use religious texts as if they are scientific, religious folks do
Stop, breh. Just stop.
You can't answer my question so I'm "obnoxious and dumb"?
So YOUR admitted lack of knowledge and understanding makes ME dumb?
I'd call lack of explanation of how evolution started a huge hole in your theory, yes. I'm referring to your theory that there is no intelligent design. Isn't it your position that there is no intelligent design? And didn't you present dog breeding as your "proof" of this?
I'm not talking about holes in the theory of evolution. I'm talking about holes in the theory of @Sensitive Blake Griffin
Good screen name though. You have certainly showed your skirt in this thread.
"I'm gonna ignore you."
Yeah, that really proves your point. Actually it kinda does. I'm more inclined to disbelieve in intelligent design from dealing with you, but not necessarily because I agree with what you say. On the contrary, your absurdity makes me think nothing of any type of intelligence could have spawned you. I'm all the way back to square one now. Let's just hope you're not naturally selected for the next generation.
Last edited by a moderator:
They aren't meant to be an all encompassing theory on life.. no one treats them as such..
You see it as disrespect and I see it as me trying to make people less stupid
Atheists aren't the ones who use religious texts as if they are scientific, religious folks do
I don't give a fukk what you think is important. You clearly don't understand evolution or what a scientific theory is. I can't keep wasting my time with stupid fukks who can't even argue logically and then hide behind the "I'm not religious!!!" excuse.
Even funkdoc isn't this obnoxious and dumb.
I'm done with this thread. All you do is keeping asking where everything came from and claim evolution has "huge holes" because of that. You're a fukking retard. Welcome to my ignore list. You join the prestigious ranks of
Crakface, Da_Eggman, Mowgli, Mr. Somebody, Sierra Mist, Slang, and spoiled. Congratulations.
You do this everytime. You are completely incapable of looking beyond your own views. You call religious people stupid for their beliefs, but when someon challenges yours you get upset. The funny thing is, plenty of people within the scientific community question the theories or at least admit that they are not complete, yet you act like anyone who challenges them are crazy religious fools. New science and discoveries come from people challenging old science and discoveries. If you were so scientifically inclined then you would understand this.
Johnny Kilroy
79 points in 1 quarter
On point again. @Sensitive Blake Griffin (bytch made Blake) is the first one to call everyone stupid but he has NO ANSWERS for any question you ask him.
It's not evolution that I'm doubting, it's him. Evolution does not disprove intelligent design AT ALL. But this fukktard is actually trying to make that claim.
Ok evolution, big bang, whatever, that's all good. But after all that is laid out I'm asking him "how" and he gets butthurt. How? An intelligent designer that's absurd and anyone who thinks that is mentally retarded. But an entire universe just appearing from nothing? That's genius!
Dude is a fukking clown.
Last edited by a moderator:
You all haven't challenged any scientific theories. I'm not upset, I honestly get baffled by the stupidity I read on here. The only point either of you Einsteins made was that we don't know where everything came from (which I even agreed with in a previous post, which was either not read or ignored by Johnny Kilmyiq. Evolution is a FACT, not an opinion or belief.
This. DNA evidence has proven evolution, to a level that stands up in court. ever heard of the Dover trial?
NOVA | Intelligent Design on Trial
hopefully a geneticist takes the challenge.
I'm a very religious guy, however, there is soo much evidence to use in court against this guy that this is easy money. He needs to remember that he's not arguing online or in a theological seminar- its a court room.
Not that a court room would even hear this trail.. he would have to embarrass himself at a university or something.