COZY: BLM leader (Deray) lives in home owned by Soros’ Open Society board member

[88m3]

Meeting with people in Congress is one thing

But POTUS? That quickly?

Nah G

There's Soros cash involved

Yeah, Breh. Obama would never meet with Deray. Deray is just some bozo community organizer who shares little in common with Obama.

 

[hashmander]

@Thomas You can try to find the youtube but heres the transcript from that interview.

Spoiler: Soros is scum

This is the relevant portion of the transcript (from the 20 December 1998 broadcast of 60 Minutes):

Quote:
KROFT: (Voiceover) To understand the complexities and contradictions in his personality, you have to go back to the very beginning: to Budapest, where George Soros was born 68 years ago to parents who were wealthy, well-educated and Jewish.

When the Nazis occupied Budapest in 1944, George Soros' father was a successful lawyer. He lived on an island in the Danube and liked to commute to work in a rowboat. But knowing there were problems ahead for the Jews, he decided to split his family up. He bought them forged papers and he bribed a government official to take 14-year-old George Soros in and swear that he was his Christian godson. But survival carried a heavy price tag. While hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were being shipped off to the death camps, George Soros accompanied his phony godfather on his appointed rounds, confiscating property from the Jews.

(Vintage footage of Jews walking in line; man dragging little boy in line)

KROFT: (Voiceover) These are pictures from 1944 of what happened to George Soros' friends and neighbors.

(Vintage footage of women and men with bags over their shoulders walking; crowd by a train)

KROFT: (Voiceover) You're a Hungarian Jew...

Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.

KROFT: (Voiceover) ...who escaped the Holocaust...

(Vintage footage of women walking by train)

Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.

(Vintage footage of people getting on train)

KROFT: (Voiceover) ... by -- by posing as a Christian.

Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Right.

(Vintage footage of women helping each other get on train; train door closing with people in boxcar)

KROFT: (Voiceover) And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.

Mr. SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that that's when my character was made.

KROFT: In what way?

Mr. SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and -- and anticipate events and when -- when one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a -- a very personal experience of evil.

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. That's right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, that's -- that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?

Mr. SOROS: Not -- not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don't -- you don't see the connection. But it was -- it created no -- no problem at all.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

KROFT: For example that, 'I'm Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.' None of that?

Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c -- I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn't be there, because that was -- well, actually, in a funny way, it's just like in markets -- that if I weren't there -- of course, I wasn't doing it, but somebody else would -- would -- would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the -- whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the -- I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

wow ya'll really are some low sons a bytches. he was 14 years old and put in the position of being "the christian" son of a man who is confiscating the property of rich jews by the adults in his life. first the evil right wing regime that wanted to exterminate him, then his father as a response to that evil because he wanted his son to survive and then finally this fake father making his rounds.

most black people in the new world don't know our family history before 1880 or some shyt. we're here because of the actions our ancestors took to survive. who knows what our men and women in our bloodline had to do to survive.

as an aside, that's why i don't want to hear from jews about discrimination and comparing how they overcame because they can pretend, just like white gay people can. black people can't pretend for our benefit.

 

[theworldismine13]

And for the last time, you're wrong. Black folks have civil rights

if you think black people have rights, that's fine, thats your opinion, thank you for sharing your opinion with me

but again, im not contradicting myself when i say black people dont have any civil rights, just because my opinion is different than yours doesnt mean im contradicting myself

Go use the "real" rhetoric for someone who doesn't think for self

ok

wow, I didn't realize I would need to explain this
Actively protesting rights infringement, doesn't mean you don't have the right

Protesting gun ownership infringement, doesn't mean you don't have the right to own guns
Protesting freedom of speech infringement, doesn't mean you don't have the right to freedom of speech
Protesting freedom of the press, doesn't mean that the press doesn't have have the freedom to report what they want

im just asking you a simple question, a yes or no will suffice

this is what i asked you

so you are saying that police are killing black people, and their rights are being violated but black people still have civil rights, is that what you are saying?

yes or no

All it means is that you're manipulative for the sole purpose of pushing a narrative

ok

Such a person nobody could trust or build with because you use racial tensions and blind ignorance as your means to push a narrative, not to solve a problem

ok

you're hurting my feelings

"members of the NAACP" now means the entire NAACP?
They could've just said the NAACP, but they specified members to distinguish from the organization

that's a minor point, the main point is that the people against garvey where supported by white liberals

So the actions of members of an organization, regardless of their role and activitiy within the org, represent the entire organization

no but since the prominent members of the naacp where agaisnt garvey its safe to say the naacp was against garvey

I guess the BLM shot those cops too then

yeah you could say that if the shooters participated in meetings and was part of the blm leadership

So a member of the electric union murks his fam, it was the union that did it

yeah they would be if the union was encouraging him to kill and if the killer was part of the leadeship of the union

Cop kills someone, it was the entire police department that killed that person

yep

Lol. So the police is paid by a white economy that consist of both whites and non-whites, called tax payers

black people are only 10 percent of the populations and in even in black cities most of the revenue comes from white business and corporations

so yes, cops are paid by white money and that is what they answer to

Suggestion for you, use your racial rhetoric against a lazy thinker to inaccurately portray something

thanks, i will consider that, im always open to new suggestions and you can always learn something even from a complete idiot such as yourself so i will definitely think about your suggestion

.....

ok ive thought about it

You finally admits it. You're pushing a narrative

yeah im using facts to push a narrative that white liberal money misleads black people

I finna use facts to provide proper context, clarity and understanding, that empowers an individual to think for self

good for you, im happy for you

Again, you should be in your own economic lane, but instead you need to shyt on another effort to prop your effort higher

im shytting on anybody that puts social activism ahead of economics

That's why I keep asking you to be an adult, stop the childish ways and ego tripping

im not tripping, im chilling

You have no facts whether the Soros' provided BLM an agenda

i have facts that deray was getting money from soros' friends

OR
whether BLM provided the financiers with an agenda

never said i did, but i wouldnt be surprised if they did

Your entire argument is based on purely assumptions, speculations, and stereotype

my arguments is based on facts

A few BLM spokesmen are already gay themselves, it only makes sense that they are also active in gay matters too

and they need to stop that, black people have nothing to do with the homosexual agenda

This is why you constantly use racial terms because you think you're talking with someone that blindly follows assumptions/stereotypes based on labels. The same labeling tactic you're using, is the same tactic used by too many non-black folks against blacks folks

try again

ok

Repeating something doesn't mean you're correct
Arbitrarily using racial labels to evoke a pattern of thinking based on stereotypes and assumptions, doesn't mean you're correct
Misrepresenting my stance, doesn't mean you're correct
Clearly, an independent thinker is your kryptonite

it doesnt but i just like to repeat it, lets repeat what your point is, your point is that black people should ignore that blm is getting funded by white liberals just like black people ignored white liberals funding the naacp as they colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey

lets marinate on your need to misrepresent my stance and history, after admitting to trying to encourage a certain narrative

your stance is that we should ignore white liberals funding blm and that we should be grateful that white liberals are funding black groups

did i miss something?

deflection fail. That's not even the point. How many times do I have to repeat the meaning of the quote for you to understand?

funding is the point im making, i dont know why you keep repeating the quote since it has nothing to do with what im saying

we are, or at least i am, discussing funding

lol. you just ether yourself
In a seperate discussion, a rich black person will be considered a target too under white supremacy

of course they would because black people dont have an economy, so a single black person would be subject to white supremacy

He admitted the importance of wealth building and specified the lack of an economic component within BLM
So again, why are you trying to add on to their agenda instead of doing your own thang, everyone has their own lane

Why is that so difficult for you to understand

because my point is that economics should be priority, not just another issue

what part of "economics comes first" is it that you dont understand?

You can't be doing much cause you're busy trying to shyt on a movement that has to do with you
While these BLM are on the front line, you stay at home plotting your loose end goals

i think blm has good intentions but they have been mislead by white liberals who have convinced them that social activism is the key and that they need to go around trying to convince white people to be nice to black people

Trying to mislead and misrepresent is all you're doing
Save all that moral victory BS with "bu bu I'm trying"

all i can do is try

Nikkas are fed up of hearing from your kind about the "whiteman" and speeches about "the dangers of white liberals" that's not complimented by actions, achievements, and practical short/long term goals
Telling a nikka to go make a billionare to combat police brutality, you just permanently lost soldier

so you think its better to go and beg white people to be nice?

And your need to change the agenda of an organization is unnecesaary
And getting your economics right, regardless of protesting or not, is what responsible citizens do, regardless of color
And don't get it twisted, Marcus Garvey was a great man, leader and I'm a strong believer in his efforts and philosophies towards uprooting white supremacy. But knowing his history doesn't spark motivation and commitment because of the realities of folks' lives now

Mariante on these realities...
Black history has been available, doesn't spark motivation and commitment
Black struggle has been portrayed, doesn't spark motivation and commitment
Prefixing the word black on concepts, doesn't spark motivation and commitment
Having a good credit score, doesn't spark motivation and commitment
Black skin, doesn't spark motivation and commitment
Labeling with terms like "whiteman begging", "white liberal funding," doesn't spark motivation and commitment

i didint read all that, i tried but it was too incoherent but it sounds interesting, thank you for sharing your thoughts, ill come back to it when i have more free time

no alternate orgs to suggest + no funding to offer + racial labels = stereotypical black militant

so bottom line is you think black people should ignore blm getting funded by soros and his white liberal buddies

is that what you are trying to say?

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

if you think black people have rights, that's fine, thats your opinion, thank you for sharing your opinion with me

but again, im not contradicting myself when i say black people dont have any civil rights, just because my opinion is different than yours doesnt mean im contradicting myself
ok
im just asking you a simple question, a yes or no will suffice
this is what i asked you
yes or no

nikka can't response so he using "ok" alot lol

Whether a person has civil rights is not an opinion, it's either you have it or not
Again, go use the "real" rhetoric for someone who doesn't think for self

that's a minor point, the main point is that the people against garvey where supported by white liberals
no but since the prominent members of the naacp where agaisnt garvey its safe to say the naacp was against garvey

No. The main point is that you don't have evidence to prove if
-NAACP sponsored anti-Garvey movement,
-who wrote BLM agenda,
-and when will "Black economic" structure come into fruition

yeah you could say that if the shooters participated in meetings and was part of the blm leadershipyeah they would be if the
union was encouraging him to kill and if the killer was part of the leadeship of the union
yep

So since you can't prove the cop, the dallas shooter, members of the NAACP or electrician was apart of their respective leadership board, then you can't make any claims that the orgs are responsible due to members' action

Which when white folks do the same against black folks, you start bytching

black people are only 10 percent of the populations and in even in black cities most of the revenue comes from white business and corporations
so yes, cops are paid by white money and that is what they answer to

Damn, desperation is real...now you want to rewrite what it means to be a tax payer by focusing on the number of the population

You want to downplay black folks contribution to the tax system to "win"
now the tax dollars are white dollars, despite non white's contributions. smh

this smart dumb nikka moment above proves what you claim to not understand, when I said...What I'm pointing out to you is that your kind has / will continue to arbitrarily use racially tone words when it fits your narrative. Providing facts and proper context is not your motivation

thanks, i will consider that, im always open to new suggestions and you can always learn something even from a complete idiot such as yourself so i will definitely think about your suggestion.....
ok ive thought about it

Also consider finding other ways of stroking your ego, instead of skewing information to mislead

im shytting on anybody that puts social activism ahead of economics

you are talking shyt, not shytting on anyone.Show proof that either me or BLM is doing this



Recall what I said...

Your entire argument is based on purely assumptions, speculations, and stereotype

but you said...

my arguments is based on facts

Once again you ethered yourself...if you're based on facts then you wouldn't be responding with dumbshyt like this to a simple statement

You have no facts whether the Soros' provided BLM an agenda
OR
whether BLM provided the financiers with an agenda

never said i did, but i wouldnt be surprised if they did

This is the main point of the entire discussion. I'm just exposing you for talking outchazz
Stay on the sideline making up shyt, while BLM is on the frontline doing shyt


All the other nonsense you're writing further proves you don't use facts to provide proper context, clarity and understanding, which empowers an individual to think for self, you want to force a narrative


no alternate orgs to suggest + no funding to offer + racial labels = stereotypical black militant

 

[theworldismine13]

nikka can't response so he using "ok" alot lol

i say ok because i want to give an acknowledgment for you taking the time to share your opinions with me

Whether a person has civil rights is not an opinion, it's either you have it or not
Again, go use the "real" rhetoric for someone who doesn't think for self

so this is the third time im asking a question and you refuse to give a simple yes or no

here is the question

so you are saying that police are killing black people, and their rights are being violated but black people still have civil rights, is that what you are saying?

can you answer this question with a simple yes or no?

No. The main point is that you don't have evidence to prove if
-NAACP sponsored anti-Garvey movement,

i posted the source stating that dubois and other members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey

-who wrote BLM agenda,

im not even clear what the blm agenda is, but i do know that they think social activism is more of a priority than economics

-and when will "Black economic" structure come into fruition

what?

So since you can't prove the cop, the dallas shooter, members of the NAACP or electrician was apart of their respective leadership board, then you can't make any claims that the orgs are responsible due to members' action

i just quoted the source in this thread that said dubois and other members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey so that means the NAACP as a whole was down with it

Which when white folks do the same against black folks, you start bytching

im not BLM, i dont bytch about white people in fact ive said a million times in these boards that white people have the constitutional right to not like black people

i never have and never will ask white people to be nicer to black people

Damn, desperation is real...now you want to rewrite what it means to be a tax payer by focusing on the number of the population


You want to downplay black folks contribution to the tax system to "win"
now the tax dollars are white dollars, despite non white's contributions. smh

im not rewriting anything im just pointing out that black people are 10 percent of the population

this smart dumb nikka moment above proves what you claim to not understand, when I said...What I'm pointing out to you is that your kind has / will continue to arbitrarily use racially tone words when it fits your narrative. Providing facts and proper context is not your motivation

whats wrong with "arbitrarily using racially tone words to fit my narrative"

Also consider finding other ways of stroking your ego, instead of skewing information to mislead

im not misleading anybody im simply using "facts to fit my narrative"

you are talking shyt, not shytting on anyone.Show proof that either me or BLM is doing this

you just wrote entire essays saying how economics isnt the most important thing, deray also posted tweets saying economics is not the most important thing

do you even read what you post?

Recall what I said...


but you said...


Once again you ethered yourself...if you're based on facts then you wouldn't be responding with dumbshyt like this to a simple statement
This is the main point of the entire discussion. I'm just exposing you for talking outchazz
Stay on the sideline making up shyt, while BLM is on the frontline doing shyt


All the other nonsense you're writing further proves you don't use facts to provide proper context, clarity and understanding, which empowers an individual to think for self, you want to force a narrative


no alternate orgs to suggest + no funding to offer + racial labels = stereotypical black militant

the main point and bottom line of this discussion is that you think black people should ignore the fact that soros and his liberal buddies are funding BLM and you are suggesting that black people should be grateful to soros for giving money to black causes

that is the whole purpose of your essays in this thread

you're a joke, you are not about black empowerment, you are just a white liberal lackey and are getting mad cuz the God Emperor aka the Humble African insulted white liberals and shytted on their money

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

wow ya'll really are some low sons a bytches. he was 14 years old and put in the position of being "the christian" son of a man who is confiscating the property of rich jews by the adults in his life. first the evil right wing regime that wanted to exterminate him, then his father as a response to that evil because he wanted his son to survive and then finally this fake father making his rounds.

Stop that .. the age of the resistance fighting fighting the nazis was 13-18...kids who didnt get a chance to enlist before the occupation..they grabbed guns and took to the woods to fight rather than be imprisoned or killed..many came from wealthy backgrounds just like his..they could have run or gone into exile but they chose to fight cos they watched their families get wiped out..
READ the transcript..he says he enjoyed the work,he felt no guilt and he learned alot.......and this sociopath is who is funding this movement

 

[KENNY DA COOKER]

Threadstarter I believe you

Robin and Jimmy Wood | Open Society Institute (OSI) - Baltimore | Audacious Ideas

 

[African Peasant]

Yup....you never see Asians marching for anything...yet they were indentured laborers during the railway boom many of them are still buried under those tracks..they were locked up in prison camps during ww2..the white man wouldnt employ them for a long time.

But as they get wealthier and their homelands get richer the "social justice" just falls into place...All the assassinated civil rights leaders knew this ....as long as Black people are poor and Africa is a shythole nobody will ever respect you...

but if youre Eating good and Africa is rising ... its guaranteed there will be fewer and fewer people wearing sheets telling you to go home n*****ger

 

[KENNY DA COOKER]

Yup....you never see Asians marching for anything...yet they were indentured laborers during the railway boom many of them are still buried under those tracks..they were locked up in prison camps during ww2..the white man wouldnt employ them for a long time.

But as they get wealthier and their homelands get richer the "social justice" just falls into place...All the assassinated civil rights leaders knew this ....as long as Black people are poor and Africa is a shythole nobody will ever respect you...

but if youre Eating good and Africa is rising ... its guaranteed there will be fewer and fewer people wearing sheets telling you to go home n*****ger

If only it was that easy...

I live by the philosophy of Tupac

U wanna go to war u gotta get ur money right

Unfortunately for Blacks the more we economicaly empower ourselves the more we gotta fight

We hqd Harlem booming THEY too that

We had Black wall street Tulsa and rosewood THEY burned that

We had The apollo ..motown ..BET they bought that

We got Al Haymon and the PBC and they SUING that

We had MANSA MUSA the richest man on earth they ROBBED and Murdered that


So NO GRASSHOPPER money just makes THEM despise us more

 

[Meta Reign]

Black folks need to distance themselves from BLM. This is obviously a rich Jew financing homos to hijack our platform. A rich Jew who wants the age of the strong black man gone. Someone who wants the black family gone.

Call it what it is and move on.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

i say ok because i want to give an acknowledgment for you taking the time to share your opinions with me



so this is the third time im asking a question and you refuse to give a simple yes or no

here is the question



can you answer this question with a simple yes or no?




i posted the source stating that dubois and other members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey



im not even clear what the blm agenda is, but i do know that they think social activism is more of a priority than economics



what?




i just quoted the source in this thread that said dubois and other members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey so that means the NAACP as a whole was down with it



im not BLM, i dont bytch about white people in fact ive said a million times in these boards that white people have the constitutional right to not like black people

i never have and never will ask white people to be nicer to black people






im not rewriting anything im just pointing out that black people are 10 percent of the population



whats wrong with "arbitrarily using racially tone words to fit my narrative"



im not misleading anybody im simply using "facts to fit my narrative"





you just wrote entire essays saying how economics isnt the most important thing, deray also posted tweets saying economics is not the most important thing

do you even read what you post?




the main point and bottom line of this discussion is that you think black people should ignore the fact that soros and his liberal buddies are funding BLM and you are suggesting that black people should be grateful to soros for giving money to black causes

that is the whole purpose of your essays in this thread

you're a joke, you are not about black empowerment, you are just a white liberal lackey and are getting mad cuz the God Emperor aka the Humble African insulted white liberals and shytted on their money

To use "facts to fit my narrative" means to cherry pick facts and skew it to mislead...Example, pointing out that size of the black population doesn't take away from the fact that tax payer's money is not white money. You're arguing just to argue at this point, and it's a waste of my time


The main point is ...

You have no facts whether the Soros' provided BLM an agenda
OR
whether BLM provided the financiers with an agenda

never said i did, but i wouldnt be surprised if they did

Post evidence OR STFU


You said members that are apart of the leadership determines whether the entire org is responsible for a member action
Where's your evidence that NAACP leadership was apart of the anti-Garvey efforts ?
Post evidence OR STFU


Oh word, Deray and I are downplaying economics
Post evidence OR STFU

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Black folks need to distance tgemselves from BLM. This is obviously a rich Jew financinflg homos to hijack our platform. A rich Jew who wants the age of the strong black man gone. Someone who wants the black family gone.

Call it what it is and move on.

Ok, could you suggest alternate orgs OR offer a means to replace Soros' coins?

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

If only it was that easy...

I live by the philosophy of Tupac

U wanna go to war u gotta get ur money right

Unfortunately for Blacks the more we economicaly empower ourselves the more we gotta fight

We hqd Harlem booming THEY too that

We had Black wall street Tulsa and rosewood THEY burned that

We had The apollo ..motown ..BET they bought that

We got Al Haymon and the PBC and they SUING that

We had MANSA MUSA the richest man on earth they ROBBED and Murdered that


So NO GRASSHOPPER money just makes THEM despise us more

I get you brother..I dont deny they sabotaged us at every turn..they kill or imprison anyone with real leadership potential and leave us with these noisy shills
Just like tupac said " we gotta fight back thats what huey said,two shots in the dark now hueys dead"

But most of what it takes to build or rebuild is not money...its hope and dreams...lots of people on this planet have had their shyt destroyed (Ironically mostly by the same cacs) but they rebuild..

but we stopped having our own hopes and dreams and internalized the hopes and dreams sold to us by the record labels,MTV,VH1 and BET..these Cacs and Jews are now planting dreams in the children's heads of selling bricks,robbing ,shooting and stripping their way to success

Nobody is ever gonna build anything useful with those

 

[theworldismine13]

To use "facts to fit my narrative" means to cherry pick facts and skew it to mislead...Example, pointing out that size of the black population doesn't take away from the fact that tax payer's money is not white money. You're arguing just to argue at this point, and it's a waste of my time


The main point is ...



Post evidence OR STFU


You said members that are apart of the leadership determines whether the entire org is responsible for a member action
Where's your evidence that NAACP leadership was apart of the anti-Garvey efforts ?

the problem is that you are disputing the facts themselves

its a historical fact that dubois and members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport garvey

25 Facts about Marcus Mosiah Garvey

its also a fact that the naacp was founded and funded by white liberals

which of these facts are you disputing?

why are you getting mad at me because these facts would lead any person of reasonable intelligence to ask how did the funding of the naacp effect how the members of the naacp acted toward garvey, which in turn would lead to ask how is the funding of blm effecting how blm members ask

you seem to be mad, not just mad but infuriated that i bring these facts up, are you being funded by white liberals?

and bottom line all the essays you wrote in this thread is because you are mad that i questioned soros and white liberal funding and your whole purpose is to assert that black people should ignore the issue of who is funding blm

Oh word, Deray and I are downplaying economics
Post evidence OR STFU

is it not your position that economics is just one issue out of many?

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

i say ok because i want to give an acknowledgment for you taking the time to share your opinions with me



so this is the third time im asking a question and you refuse to give a simple yes or no

here is the question



can you answer this question with a simple yes or no?




i posted the source stating that dubois and other members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey



im not even clear what the blm agenda is, but i do know that they think social activism is more of a priority than economics



what?




i just quoted the source in this thread that said dubois and other members of the naacp colluded with the government to deport the Honorable Marcus Garvey so that means the NAACP as a whole was down with it



im not BLM, i dont bytch about white people in fact ive said a million times in these boards that white people have the constitutional right to not like black people

i never have and never will ask white people to be nicer to black people






im not rewriting anything im just pointing out that black people are 10 percent of the population



whats wrong with "arbitrarily using racially tone words to fit my narrative"



im not misleading anybody im simply using "facts to fit my narrative"





you just wrote entire essays saying how economics isnt the most important thing, deray also posted tweets saying economics is not the most important thing

do you even read what you post?




the main point and bottom line of this discussion is that you think black people should ignore the fact that soros and his liberal buddies are funding BLM and you are suggesting that black people should be grateful to soros for giving money to black causes

that is the whole purpose of your essays in this thread

you're a joke, you are not about black empowerment, you are just a white liberal lackey and are getting mad cuz the God Emperor aka the Humble African insulted white liberals and shytted on their money

lawd