COVID-19 Pandemic (Coronavirus)

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,377
Reputation
-34,322
Daps
617,907
Reppin
The Deep State
WSJ News Exclusive | Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date

Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date
Patients who got the antiparasitic drug didn’t fare better than those who received a placebo
Sarah ToyMar. 18, 2022 7:00 am ET
im-506883

Researchers testing repurposed drugs against Covid-19 found that ivermectin didn’t reduce hospital admissions, in the largest trial yet of the effect of the antiparasitic on the disease driving the pandemic.

Ivermectin has received a lot of attention as a potential treatment for Covid-19including from celebrities such as podcast host Joe Rogan. Most evidence has shown it to be ineffective against Covid-19 or has relied on data of poor quality, infectious-disease researchers said. Public-health authorities and researchers have for months said the drug hasn’t shown any benefit in treating the disease. Taking large doses of the drug is dangerous, the Food and Drug Administration has said.

The latest trial, of nearly 1,400 Covid-19 patients at risk of severe disease, is the largest to show that those who received ivermectin as a treatment didn’t fare better than those who received a placebo.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS
How should the most recent studies on the efficacy of ivermectin against Covid-19 influence its use going forward? Join the conversation below.

“There was no indication that ivermectin is clinically useful,” said Edward Mills, one of the study’s lead researchers and a professor of health sciences at Canada’s McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. Dr. Mills on Friday plans to present the findings, which have been accepted for publication in a major peer-reviewed medical journal, at a public forum sponsored by the National Institutes of Health.

Dr. Mills and his colleagues looked at 1,358 adults who visited one of 12 clinics in the Minas Gerais region of Brazil with Covid-19 symptoms. The patients all had a positive rapid test for SARS-CoV-2, and were at risk of having a severe case for reasons including a history of diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease or lung disease.

im-506882

Poster with the phrase, ‘We have ivermectin,’ at a pharmacy in Ceilândia, Brazil. Photo: Ricardo Jayme/AGIF/Associated Press
The researchers prescribed half of the patients a course of ivermectin pills for three days. The other half received a placebo. They tracked whether the patients were hospitalized within 28 days. The researchers also looked at whether patients on ivermectin cleared the virus from their bodies faster than those who received a placebo, whether their symptoms resolved sooner, whether they were in the hospital or on ventilators for less time and whether there was any difference in the death rates for the two groups.

To make sure they were being thorough, the researchers analyzed the data in three different ways. They looked at data from all patients; then analyzed data from patients who received ivermectin or a placebo 24 hours before they were hospitalized; and in a third review, looked at data from patients who said they had adhered strictly to their dosing schedule. In each scenario, they found ivermectin didn’t improve patient outcomes.

“This is the first large, prospective study that should really help put to rest ivermectin and not give any credibility to the use of it for Covid-19,” said Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, who reviewed the findings.

Ivermectin is used primarily to treat patients with certain parasitic diseases. It has antiviral properties, but hasn’t been approved by the FDA to treat any viral infections.

Given its antiviral prospects, scientists early in the pandemic thought it could be a candidate for treating Covid-19. In June 2020, a group of researchers in Australia published a paper showing that large amounts of ivermectin could halt replication of the coronavirus in cell cultures. But there was a problem: To achieve that effect, a person would have to take up to 100 times as much ivermectin as the dose approved for use in humans.

Some studies on ivermectin published in journals or on preprint servers ahead of peer review have demonstrated no benefits, or worsening of Covid-19 symptoms, after ivermectin use. Some have shown some benefit, such as shorter time to symptom resolution, reduction in inflammation, faster viral clearance and lower death rates.

im-506884

Ivermectin capsules, seen last year in the Philippines, where the drug was distributed in some places despite a lack of evidence to show it prevents or cures Covid-19.Photo: rolex dela pena/Shutterstock
But most studies showing positive effects had significant limitations such as small sample sizes or poorly defined outcomes, according to the NIH. Several studies on ivermectin have been withdrawn from publication, including a randomized controlled trial looking at 100 patients in Lebanon that was retracted by the journal Viruses due to issues with the statistical analysis, according to the journal. Researchers at the NIH and Oxford University also are conducting large trials on the effectiveness of ivermectin, though results haven’t been published.

Dr. Mills said ivermectin could improve outcomes in Covid-19 patients who are fighting off certain parasitic diseases at the same time. But based on his team’s findings, he said, the drug doesn’t seem to have any effect on Covid-19 itself.

Dr. Mills and his colleagues also are studying other drugs that could be repurposed to work against Covid-19. Such drugs could be useful because their side effects are well known and they may be cheaper to deploy in poor countries than drugs like Merck & Co. and Ridgeback Biotherapeutics LP’s molnupiravir or Pfizer Inc ’s Paxlovid.



VIDEO


The Science Behind Long Covid

im-486184

The Science Behind Long Covid

New studies offer clues about who may be more susceptible to long Covid, a term for lingering Covid-19 symptoms. WSJ breaks down the science of long Covid and the state of treatment. Illustration: Jacob Reynolds for the Wall Street Journal
Merck said it has taken steps to make molnupiravir available in low- and middle-income countries, including allocating three million courses for distribution through aid groups and granting licenses to generic manufacturers. Pfizer said it was working to expand its supply chain and licensing production of Paxlovid through a United Nations program.

Dr. Mills and his collaborators have looked at 11 repurposed treatments against Covid-19, of which at least one has shown promise—fluvoxamine, which is commonly used to treat obsessive compulsive disorder and depression. They published the research in the Lancet Global Health in October, showing that Covid-19 patients who received fluvoxamine were less likely to require hospitalization than those who didn’t.

The researchers are looking at the effect in Covid-19 patients of combining fluvoxamine and an inhaled steroid, budesonide, as well as a drug called peginterferon lambda, which is used to treat chronic viral hepatitis.

Write to Sarah Toy at sarah.toy@wsj.com

Latest Covid-19 Policies
Updates on what to do and where to get the supplies you need, selected by the editors
 

Doin2Much Williams

Grace Under Fiyah
Supporter
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
14,015
Reputation
3,935
Daps
27,507
Reppin
Insignificant posting from an insignificant poster
:yeshrug: I take the flu shot every year, and I’m boosted up. What’s one more?




No different than that last drink at the end of the night that damn near blacked you out and had you sleeping with a banshee.


And this is coming from a double vacks/booster recipient.


Who knows that's in that fourth elixer



.
 

Atlrocafella

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,758
Reputation
3,002
Daps
92,271
Reppin
Atlanta, Georgia

Absolut

Legal Bookie
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,353
Reputation
515
Daps
54,219
Reppin
Las Vegas
fukk Fauci, nicca loves the attention and couldn’t wait to get some shine back. We aren’t having any more lockdowns. We had a whole NBA/NFL season during the omicron variant, and this new variant is less severe.
We will just keep going round and round. The shut ins with no lives will clamor for lockdowns at any sign of rising cases anywhere on earth, while everyone else is comfortable accepting the risk of either getting vaccinated or not, and going on with life.
 

Atlrocafella

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,758
Reputation
3,002
Daps
92,271
Reppin
Atlanta, Georgia
We will just keep going round and round. The shut ins with no lives will clamor for lockdowns at any sign of rising cases anywhere on earth, while everyone else is comfortable accepting the risk of either getting vaccinated or not, and going on with life.
All facts. Thankfully I live in Georgia, so that lockdown shyt ain’t happening regardless.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
55,695
Reputation
8,224
Daps
157,205
No different than that last drink at the end of the night that damn near blacked you out and had you sleeping with a banshee.


And this is coming from a double vacks/booster recipient.


Who knows that's in that fourth elixer



.

full


you're comparing the vaccine to literal poison. the analogy is even poorer considering the vaccine and booster shot is dispensed intermittently, timed for waning antibodies.

unless a new vaccine is approved the booster shot is the vaccine, the same exact vaccine that debuted in january of 2021.
 

Atlrocafella

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
25,758
Reputation
3,002
Daps
92,271
Reppin
Atlanta, Georgia
Fauci says US unlikely to see surge from new COVID-19 variant

Chief White House medical adviser Anthony Fauci said on Sunday that he does not think the U.S. will see another surge in COVID-19 cases due to the spread of a new omicron variant, even though cases are rising in Europe and Asia due to the strain.

Fauci said while appearing on ABC's "This Week" that the new omicron strain is about 50 to 60 percent more transmissible than the first omicron strain, adding that it could take over as the dominant strain in the U.S.

However, he noted that the strain does not appear to cause more severe illness or evade immune responses from vaccination or prior infection.

"Hopefully, we won't see a surge. I don't think we will. The easiest way to prevent that is to continue to get people vaccinated. And for those who have been vaccinated, to continue to get them boosted, so that's really where we stand right now," said Fauci, though he acknowledged the U.S. will likely see an "uptick" in cases.


Host George Stephanopoulos asked if there was any reason to reverse the relaxation of pandemic restrictions that has taken place in the past month.

"I don't think so, George, not right now. I don't see us going back into any more really very restrict kinds of restrictions. But you always have to have the flexibility," Fauci said.
Fauci says US unlikely to see surge from new COVID-19 variant


:russ:This Nicca Fauci doesn’t know whether he wants to scare people or keep them calm. He just loves the attention though.
 
Top