Coronavirus Thread: Worldwide Pandemic

TheDarceKnight

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
29,120
Reputation
12,795
Daps
90,586
Reppin
Jiu Jitsu
I think we disagree. I read "peak" to mean the maximum amount of people who will get the disease. When you see the curve it is either flat - and extended (long peak) or short and very steep (30 day).
you can read both totals as the same number of people just over different time periods.
Peak does not mean no one else gets it because of a cure - it means no one else left to get it because most people are immune from exposure (already getting it)
Someone correct me if I am wrong but we definitely don't want this to peak early because that means more people die from the system collapsing.
Re: the bold that is absolutely right. An early peak would be incredibly bad because that means a ton of people will get it all at once and the system won't be able to handle it. Ideally we'd like to extend the peak out and 'flatten that curve' so you are spot on.

Edit: @the cac mamba If the same number of people were destined to get it for example, we would want to extend that time period as long as possible, as opposed to having them all get it in a short time span.
 

Chronic

All Star
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
1,795
Reputation
3,081
Daps
7,993
I think we disagree. I read "peak" to mean the maximum amount of people who will get the disease. When you see the curve it is either flat - and extended (long peak) or short and very steep (30 day).
you can read both totals as the same number of people just over different time periods.
Peak does not mean no one else gets it because of a cure - it means no one else left to get it because most people are immune from exposure (already getting it)
Someone correct me if I am wrong but we definitely don't want this to peak early because that means more people die from the system collapsing.

you're right if the peaks are the same. The idea behind flattening the curve is that you have a lower peak, later, saving more lives and keeping the outbreak at manageable levels
NPR Choice page
it's not semantics creh, it's epidemiology

iu
I thought it refer to something like this

Faster peak = less infecteds
And medical shyt in auto factories sounds like some end of the world shyt
 

blotter

All Star
Supporter
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
2,035
Reputation
860
Daps
11,290
I know we will never do it, but the more I think about it we should be empowering kids. They are all but immune and can deliver shyt on bikes and fukk it 8th grade and up get behind the wheel. House them all together in a school, put one kid in charge of taking temps coming and going. This is our next generation and putting trust in their hands would do so much good for the future

Obviously venting here, but we just dont think outside of the box as a society
 

TheDarceKnight

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
29,120
Reputation
12,795
Daps
90,586
Reppin
Jiu Jitsu
Why this is happening. Not my nikka stringer bell. This sucks brehs
:mjcry:
In some good news, Tom Hanks is recovering really well supposedly, and he's almost 15 years older than Idris.

Still scared for him, but he seems like he's in good shape (:dame:) and I hope he recovers fast.
 

Czerka

All Star
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
6,895
Reputation
-120
Daps
6,730
Reppin
NULL
I think people will settle down once they see these celebrities recover without complications
 

F K

All Star
Joined
Jan 13, 2017
Messages
3,204
Reputation
480
Daps
10,121
What does that have to do with what I said?

Please provide the correlation
you said an earlier peak (30 days) is better than a later peak (90 days) but most of the research concludes that earlier peaks lead to more deaths. are you using a metric other than deaths to determine what "better" is?
 
Top