3,500
i laugh at idiots who say this was rushed... that doctor was working on this long time, she just didnt have the fundingJust incase anyone thinks that this shyt came too fast, this woman spent 40 years working on this shyt
i laugh at idiots who say this was rushed... that doctor was working on this long time, she just didnt have the funding
You still de pan dat ?
How about what the FDA says ..
"Additional adverse reactions, some of which may be serious, may become apparent with more widespread use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine."
"FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech C O VID-19 Vaccine, which is not an FDA-approved vaccine."
"The significant known and potential risks and benefits of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and the extent to which such risks and benefits are unknown"
"The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is a vaccine and may prevent you from getting COVID-19. There is no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19."
"Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials."
"The United States FDA has made the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine available under an emergency access mechanism called an EUA. The EUA is supported by a Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) declaration that circumstances exist to justify the emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic."
"The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review as an FDA-approved or cleared product. FDA may issue an EUA when certain criteria are met, which includes that there are no adequate, approved, available alternatives. In addition, the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19"
https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/download
Good post. At what point would it potentially be safe to take?
Yeah but breh your positionning is kinda sketchy though. On one hand, you stay highlighting the potential side effects of the vaccines but on the other you're "I'm not a doctor, I'm not telling you what to do ". You know damn well instilling doubt into something implictly goes against its use.You misunderstand what I am saying and how these things work. It's a sliding scale of risk. It's a personal decision. And most importantly of all I am not a doctor and I am not telling people what they should do.
The facts are the facts and we cannot just ignore them or wish them away with wishful thinking.
Yeah but breh your positionning is kinda sketchy though. On one hand, you stay highlighting the potential side effects of the vaccines but on the other you're "I'm not a doctor, I'm not telling you what to do ". You know damn well instilling doubt into something implictly goes against its use.
We all know the approvals are rushed and the widespread use may cause unexpected side effects. I think we all agree on that. Short term, there seem not to have much if not any. Mid term, long term we cant know and wont know until a few years.
But once again, you seem to compare potential side effects in the future however severe they might be to actual deaths and disabilities that are happening right now. In the US alone, they are on par with 100k deaths a month
At which point do you find acceptable for the balance to tip towards emergency use ? Because as the FDA states, that's what it is.
Covid-19: Virus Has Recently Infected 1 in 50 in England
over 9% right now in NYC talk of closing schools again