Facts.
Cordae secured the Bag: NAOMI OSAKA PREGNANT!!!
- Thread starter Doobie Doo
- Start date
Whats this forum obsession with calling and assuming every young entertainer is broke or doesn't have that much money, reads like some cacs.
Kick Reportedly Offers Kai Cenat And iShowSpeed $40 Million To Leave Twitch
"That just goes to show you bro, it’s NBA money."
www.thegamer.com
Youtuber and streamers are on a higher level than a lot of rappers in this day and age.
DDG isnt just a low level rapper, he is a low level rapper, plus a high level youtuber.
This forum is really really out of touch
A man with 20m can go broke if he has obscene spending habits, its not really hear or there and a reason to assume everyone is broke.
Every young rapper influencer is supposedly broke if you let the coli tell it, believe what you want but its not the truth.
You don't need to look up celeb net worth, if you're around people in the same fields and understand how they make their money, i never did one google search, the net-worth pages are a lie.
I don't know what alot of money is to you bro.
But we already know young bro's pockets ain't phat like a jayz or Dr. Dre.
And he isn't a major star.
He's basically in the same bracket as a regular katt with a good career, 401k and a property.
So this conversation is about how shorty should have been dealing with a higher level man. Someone with more money and status.
Or at least made this dude marry her before she got pregnant.
That's all we're saying.
Last edited:
They don't wanna hear it when it sounds too much like right. Remember how they were freaking out not too long ago when that old clip of Beyonce came out praising her husband. They worship and listen to them as long as it fits the narrative everything else they throw to the wayside. But Beyonce literally is the blueprint that most of these women should look up to but a healthy happy relationship doesn't sound like fun and being able to do what you want
At this point women gotta start calling the women out. Just like the brehs gotta start holding the men accountable. But again a man is only gonna do what a woman allow. So a lot of brehs are adjusting to the current market since it's open season and you can hit a chic without commitment. But if chics change the parameters of who they allow access to sex brehs will adjust accordingly since that's what we're chasing primarily.
Agree
Pegasus Jackson
Trump's Amerikkka
Women are not a monolith and they're not all going to become lock step vaginal gatekeepers. Any man worth his salt who getting too much resistance will simply move on to a filthier, nastier trollop who are in no short supply.
And if all he wants is sex then he can go onWomen are not a monolith and they're not all going to become lock step vaginal gatekeepers. Any man worth his salt who getting too much resistance will simply move on to a filthier, nastier trollop who are in no short supply.
Proving the point. A chick is supposed to pop her legs open quick because if she doesn’t the next chick will. But when she gets an std or gets pregnant ol boy won’t be offering commitment as soon as she tells him. So why put yourself at risk like that?
LiveFromLondon
Superstar
Hate to say it but a white women of similar levels to Osaka and that other chick wouldn't find herself in such a situation
This is a CULTURAL PROBLEM
I may be a tough pill to swallow but you can never say that I’m not consistent.
Check these quotes from the old thread and see who/what I quoted.
THIS IS WHY BABYMOMMAS persist.
Everyone knows young girls get wrapped up and fooled easily, which is why families are supposed to protect and game up their girls. Because men will gladly knock you up and act like shyt is cool until they’re ready to move on to someone else, leaving you in a house with a baby all alone.
This is a CULTURAL PROBLEM and BOTH SEXES need to be called out.
People want to play stupid, but I shouted out the Black men who called it for what it is.
Plenty of brehs who “are not bums” (I.e. gainfully employed) have the mentality that kids out of wedlock is OK. This is why we are where we are.
MEN think it’s cool to knock a young girl up as long as they aren’t broke.
CULTURAL PROBLEM
No- take it ALL THE WAY THERE.
White women AND White men.
See the Britney Spears abortion thread someone posted yesterday??
Britney Spears had an abortion because JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE told her that they were not ready to be parents.
And he was right.
THE WHITE MAN tells his young girlfriend to get an abortion so that neither of their lives are thrown off track.
BREHS ain’t telling these girls to get abortions. They selling dreams and then ol girl is a babymomma while the white girl cries, moves on and has kids WITHIN WEDLOCK with a man who actually marries her first.
This is a CULTURAL PROBLEM.
Other communities do the same shyt we do. Young people are dumb, reckless, and fall in and out of love everyday. The difference is in those communities both sexes aren’t encouraging babies out of wedlock.
You either have enough sense to use protection and not put yourself in this situation OR you make the tough decision to get an abortion so society doesn’t label you a babymomma.
The Black community will call girls out for being babymommas but no one wants to call out the dudes who are in relationships who encourage it. Dudes are selling dreams to these young girls while other guys are telling their girls NOT to have the kid.
Data has black women leading the way in abortions, in full and per rate. Weren't we calling it genocide of the black community not too long ago?
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/ss/ss7110a1.htm?s_cid=ss7110a1_w
So either brehs are telling these women to get abortions and they are listening or they are deciding for themselves. We even have examples of famous brehs caught up in bullshyt because they were pushing their women to get abortions (Tristan Thompson).
Your point doesn't line-up with reality.
People do actually but they get slandered to hell and back and part of the reason why we have this odd and weird idea that if a kid is provided for financially, they will be fine. I've seen this nonsense promoted on this site by women even. Finally, it's mostly men that complain about these kinds of men in the first place. That whine and literally rage to the point of violence about Pookies and hood nikkas. And what do we do? We collectively make fun of these men and call them squares, assuming when we're not calling them incels.
The problem is that the opposite of all this is often called empowerment. Who are the ones calling it that? That's who you should be looking at and honestly, attacking. To put it bluntly. male feminists (male hyenas, if you will) and a decent share of women.
That said, I agree that the problem is cultural/socioeconomic in nature. The problem is that there is no inherent consistency to the overall idea concerning this issue from a lot of people. Talk to some of these people and you'll want to punch them repeatedly. Not because you disagree but because they aren't making sense and are hypocritical. The same people that will be saying that money is enough to raise a kid and that men are not needed will be the same ones deriding the lack of a male figure in the household and claiming money is not enough. There's a schizophrenic approach to community and that shyt has to end and those people have to be called out, consistently.
