Conservative Internet Idiots Mega Thread

[Lord_Chief_Rocka]

Let me go and check their current Juelz.

 

[Gains]

have to hand it to traiq , he's not dumb enough to pose in a maga hat

 

[Cole Cash]

Let me go and check their current Juelz.

That place is fukking infiltrated. You had people in there posting Yvette's justification for the words "blood and soil" as well as people saying "well if we wanna get what we want we gotta make alliances" and stupid ass Nap cosigning the entire thing. I have seen anti gay posts from sites like "Dangerous.com", Bullshyt posts from places like the "The Daily Wire" and "The Daily Caller". Alt right has a foothold in that fukking forum and its obvious.

 

[---]

This clown!

 

[tru_m.a.c]

Wasn’t sure where to put this

Game changing post.

 

[Gains]

That place is fukking infiltrated. You had people in there posting Yvette's justification for the words "blood and soil" as well as people saying "well if we wanna get what we want we gotta make alliances" and stupid ass Nap cosigning the entire thing. I have seen anti gay posts from sites like "Dangerous.com", Bullshyt posts from places like the "The Daily Wire" and "The Daily Caller". Alt right has a foothold in that fukking forum and its obvious.

doesn't he claim to be the son of black immigrants ?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Wasn’t sure where to put this

TLR looking funny in the light

@Barnett114 @Call Me James

That place is fukking infiltrated. You had people in there posting Yvette's justification for the words "blood and soil" as well as people saying "well if we wanna get what we want we gotta make alliances" and stupid ass Nap cosigning the entire thing. I have seen anti gay posts from sites like "Dangerous.com", Bullshyt posts from places like the "The Daily Wire" and "The Daily Caller". Alt right has a foothold in that fukking forum and its obvious.

I hate it when people try to take advantage of ignorance.

You see her juelzing in there about how, "We even had a former board member of the Sierra Club"? She's expecting you not to know that that's a relic of when the White Nationalists actively tried to take over the Sierra Club.

As a recent report from the Southern Poverty Law Center notes, a number of right-wing groups have launched a new organization called Progressives for Immigration Reform, running ads in liberal publications, blaming immigrations for urban sprawl, overconsumption, and a whole host of planetary ills. "Time and again," the SPLC report notes, "they have suggested that immigration is the most important issue for conservationists."

That just meant nativist groups had to resort to infiltration. In 1986, a white nationalist named John Tanton, who had helped seed a number of anti-immigration groups, wrote a memo suggesting that taking over the Sierra Club would be an especially worthwhile endeavor. "The Sierra Club may not want to touch the immigration issue," he wrote, "but the immigration issue is going to touch the Sierra Club!" Tanton's allies helped form the Sierrans for U.S. Population Stabilization (SUSPS), a group that worked to try to budge the club out of its studiously neutral stance on immigration.

The leadership of the Sierra Club, the landmark environmental organization, is enmeshed in a bitter struggle over whether to advocate tough immigration restrictions as a way to control environmental damage that has been associated with rapid population growth.

The debate is unusual in its intensity, even for an organization whose fractious disputes are legendary. It focuses on efforts by several outsiders and grass-roots members of the club to win seats on the board of directors. The dissident group is led by Richard D. Lamm, the former Democratic governor of Colorado, who has argued for 20 years that national policies leave the country open to unsustainable immigration.

At stake is the leadership of an organization of 750,000 members that has a 112-year history of pushing conservation and pollution issues into the national consciousness and federal law.

For weeks, both camps have issued charges and countercharges and the dissidents have filed two lawsuits, neither of which is active.

For starters, the executive director of the club, Carl Pope, said that Mr. Lamm's supporters were ''in bed with racists.'' An internal group supporting the mainstream candidates further contends that Mr. Lamm and his fellow candidates are unwitting blocking backs for a stealthy network of nativist groups that wants to take control of the organization, which was founded by a Scottish immigrant, John Muir.

Twice in the last eight years, the club has become embroiled in sharp debates over the approach to take on population and immigration issues. Mr. Lamm says he wants to put immigration back on the agenda, where it was until 1996 when the club's board decided to take a neutral stance on the issue. Two years later, the membership voted by a 3-to-2 ratio to maintain that stance.

Since then, at least five people who were not endorsed by the board's leadership have been elected to the 15-member board by the members.

 

[Gains]

explains why im seeing accounts on social media with ados operating like alt right troll groups

 

[tru_m.a.c]

 

[tru_m.a.c]

 

[tru_m.a.c]

 

[tru_m.a.c]

 

[tru_m.a.c]

 

[Wild self]

Thats something that a 4th grader would do

Comedy at the highest form.

 

[tru_m.a.c]