Concealed Carry Holder Shoots Pitbull Charging Him On His Own Property

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,880
Reputation
4,381
Daps
88,946
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
full
:laff::laff::laff:
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,960
Reputation
1,546
Daps
55,911
Yeah yeah what the fukk ever
a dog that was bred for the fighting is a dog that was bred for fighting.

Unless you going back in time with a time machine and stopping that breed from fighting in the 1800s its fukk Pitbulls for life.

Wouldn't expect a tiger to change it's way why would I expect that sociopath breed to as well.
:mjlol::hhh::mjtf::what: a tiger is a wild animal. A "pit" is domesticated. Countless studies have shown it's all comes down to socializing and proper training.
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,960
Reputation
1,546
Daps
55,911
Dogbites.org is trash


You should link actual research by professionals. Most dogs in these attacks are labeled pits when they're are mutts or mixes. I'm all for holding irresponsible people accountable but let's use facts to justify our cases. Here let me help you:

a paper published in The Veterinary Journal, researchers say animal shelter staff frequently mislabel non-pit-bull dogs as pit bulls.

“Pit bull” is not a breed but a type that describes several breeds. The American Staffordshire terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, and American pit bull terrier are all pit bulls. These dogs have been maligned as violent and aggressive by nature—a reputation they have not earned. But news reports disproportionately report the culprits of dog attacks as pit bulls, even when, as scientists note, it’s unlikely that most of them are. As the researchers cite, about 46 percent of American dogs are mutts, but 90 percent of dogs named by the media in attack stories were labeled with a single breed or type (often pit bull). The numbers just don’t add up, they say.
DNA Tests Show Many Shelter Dogs Are Mislabeled as Pit Bulls

Position Statement on Pit Bulls

No. The first thing I did when I was consulting this book is reach out to the experts in the animal sciences to talk about what’s going on with these incidents and how best to prevent them. Fatalities are incredibly rare. In the U.S., we have 320 million people and between 77 and 83 million dogs. So your chance of being killed by any type of dog in the U.S. in any given year is one in 10 million.

People who have studied these cases, like Jeffrey Sacks at the CDC, have shown that when it comes to fatalities caused by pit bulls, the breed identifications are often not accurate. The title “pit bull” has expanded so dramatically over the years that people are lumping any dog with a large head and short coat into that category rather than separating out each of the pit bull breeds.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/api.na...-bull-ban-aggressive-dog-breed-bronwen-dikkey

The article above really shows the positives and negatives of our society. Dog should've been killed and the owner sued
 
Last edited:
Top