I agree with you that
@Pressure's disingenuous bullshyt is HL 2022 in a nutshell.
Bernie got more thousands more votes in Iowa than any other candidate. He was only granted 562.02 SDEs compared to 562.95 SDEs for Pete through a convoluted-ass warping of the results that no one understands to this day. Claiming Pete won as some sort of gotcha when he actually earned thousands fewer votes than Bernie is classic
@Pressure.
en.wikipedia.org
The worst part is that
our discussion wasn't about who won. The claim was "Bernie doesn't inspire youth turnout more than other Dems". I proved that Bernie inspired RECORD youth turnout in Iowa 2020 with a MASSIVE portion of the youth vote going to him. Pete's youth vote was ass. So how is the claim, "But Pete won!" anything other than a deflection from the actual argument?
Tellingly, Bernie won the majority of votes in Iowa by dominating among young voters, dominating among non-White voters, and having a clear edge among working-class White voters. You know, all the places where Democrats need better turnout to compete in the general. Pete finished just a few thousand votes behind him by doing well with old Democrats and highly educated white Democrats. You know, the two groups where Dems have the least to gain in voter turnout and the least to make up in future elections.
I wonder if the Democratic establishment will deal with that reality or if they'll ignore it and just keep trying the same bullshyt, hoping for a different result....