Coli centrists, what's so great about centrism: come in here and sell us on your political leaning

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,773
Reputation
12,408
Daps
195,271
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
i'm a centrist, but not a McCentrist.... i don't see how we can govern our country based on my values.... i can live my life based on my values, but we have to govern our country based on our values.... which means when it comes to governing this country, i have to compromise with others i disagree with in order to get concessions for things i do agree with....

compromise is not always the watered down middle between two ideas, sometimes it's giving up on one fight completely to win another fight... (i.e.: i would give up on the gun control fight and even advocate for expanding gun rights in order to win at implementing universal health care)

i don't see a complete progressive agenda winning the entire nation when tens of millions of people are vehemently opposed to progressivism.... it means we have to find areas of agreement and push for those.... now, that doesn't mean that our McPoliticians actually do this in good faith, but i still don't see how we can progress without any concessions of any kind.... that's just crazy....
But I’m sure I can get Willy from Kansas to see why he needs to change the way he and his family think. Just give me a few more minutes of telling him how stupid he is :mjgrin:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,692
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
:wow: especially the bold

So independent from the system, who do you believe is more persuasive to the average American, Bernie or Biden? Can you answer that directly and honestly without deflecting?



But telling people how stupid they are and how they don’t know what’s best for themselves has worked out great so far :mjgrin:

Yet every time the Democratic establishment does it during the primaries, we're told that it's "their right to choose" and that it's okay for them to put their thumb on the scale rather than go with the voters' favorite independent.

Not to mention that all the establishment does every time they lose is shyt on anyone who didn't vote for them rather than admit their own campaign failures. :mjlol::mjlol::mjlol:




But I’m sure I can get Willy from Kansas to see why he needs to change the way he and his family think. Just give me a few more minutes of telling him how stupid he is :mjgrin:

This coming from the party whose last three candidates tried to win elections by saying, "If you don't vote for me you ain't Black", calling their opponents "deplorables", and claiming they can't think straight cause they cling to guns and religion. :mjlol:

oh-that-was-different-injured.gif




Waiting for another goalpost shift in 3....2....1....
 

LOST IN THE SAUCE

The Sauce Apostle
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Messages
1,919
Reputation
849
Daps
6,737
Reppin
HONOLULU
But telling people how stupid they are and how they don’t know what’s best for themselves has worked out great so far :mjgrin:

But I’m sure I can get Willy from Kansas to see why he needs to change the way he and his family think. Just give me a few more minutes of telling him how stupid he is :mjgrin:
More bad faith bullshyt from another clown. People are having actual discussions in this thread and for some reason you decided to take a note out of @the cac mamba playbook and come in here to troll.

Let the grown ups talk, TLR is that way. :camby:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,157
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,846
Reppin
CookoutGang
the irony would be hilarious if it wasn’t so incessantly thick
It's kinda of an ironic full circle for me considering it was one of the major critiques of dems during the Obama administration. The idea that the liberal elites wanted to govern as though they were morally superior.

Interestingly enough it still rings strong in Republican discourse to this day. The idea that parents and families know best and don't need the government telling them what to do.

:patrice:
 

LOST IN THE SAUCE

The Sauce Apostle
Joined
Jun 15, 2022
Messages
1,919
Reputation
849
Daps
6,737
Reppin
HONOLULU
The Neo-Liberal defense force are going to tell you that they actually are progressive, but they'll turn around and make up some bullshyt just to punch left right after.

You're not going to get a straight up answer from them because they will not discuss in good faith. If you ask them what their problem with progressives and the rest of the left is, they'll create a straw man to point at. They're a walking, talking David Feldman skit, but without any of the irony.


That's why I keep my foot on their necks every time I see some bad faith bullshyt from them.


Here comes the liberal clown brigade to do exactly as predicted. :snoop:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,692
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
Kinda wild to use the Iowa caucus as some type of definitive metric when Pete won it. :why:


I agree with you that @Pressure's disingenuous bullshyt is HL 2022 in a nutshell. :skip:

Bernie got more thousands more votes in Iowa than any other candidate. He was only granted 562.02 SDEs compared to 562.95 SDEs for Pete through a convoluted-ass warping of the results that no one understands to this day. Claiming Pete won as some sort of gotcha when he actually earned thousands fewer votes than Bernie is classic @Pressure.





The worst part is that our discussion wasn't about who won. The claim was "Bernie doesn't inspire youth turnout more than other Dems". I proved that Bernie inspired RECORD youth turnout in Iowa 2020 with a MASSIVE portion of the youth vote going to him. Pete's youth vote was ass. So how is the claim, "But Pete won!" anything other than a deflection from the actual argument?

Tellingly, Bernie won the majority of votes in Iowa by dominating among young voters, dominating among non-White voters, and having a clear edge among working-class White voters. You know, all the places where Democrats need better turnout to compete in the general. Pete finished just a few thousand votes behind him by doing well with old Democrats and highly educated white Democrats. You know, the two groups where Dems have the least to gain in voter turnout and the least to make up in future elections.

I wonder if the Democratic establishment will deal with that reality or if they'll ignore it and just keep trying the same bullshyt, hoping for a different result....
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,252
Reputation
6,217
Daps
167,630
I really think progressive organizations need
to be community organizations before they become political groups.

No one likes centrism or meely mouth moderates except the people who benefit from the status quo like the Neoliberal and centrist defense forces in this thread.

Make the case in your communities by providing services and helping people instead of jumping head first into politics.
 
Last edited:

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,275
Reputation
16,202
Daps
267,958
Reppin
Oakland
I agree with you that @Pressure's disingenuous bullshyt is HL 2022 in a nutshell. :skip:

Bernie got more thousands more votes in Iowa than any other candidate. He was only granted 562.02 SDEs compared to 562.95 SDEs for Pete through a convoluted-ass warping of the results that no one understands to this day. Claiming Pete won as some sort of gotcha when he actually earned thousands fewer votes than Bernie is classic @Pressure.





The worst part is that our discussion wasn't about who won. The claim was "Bernie doesn't inspire youth turnout more than other Dems". I proved that Bernie inspired RECORD youth turnout in Iowa 2020 with a MASSIVE portion of the youth vote going to him. Pete's youth vote was ass. So how is the claim, "But Pete won!" anything other than a deflection from the actual argument?

Tellingly, Bernie won the majority of votes in Iowa by dominating among young voters, dominating among non-White voters, and having a clear edge among working-class White voters. You know, all the places where Democrats need better turnout to compete in the general. Pete finished just a few thousand votes behind him by doing well with old Democrats and highly educated white Democrats. You know, the two groups where Dems have the least to gain in voter turnout and the least to make up in future elections.

I wonder if the Democratic establishment will deal with that reality or if they'll ignore it and just keep trying the same bullshyt, hoping for a different result....
that wasn't the claim, the claim was if Bernie who was able to invigorate the youth couldn't do it again with more years to prepare and more resources, why should that be a demographic that's counted on? how many phantom candidates are going to do that for congressional and presidential elections? and repeatedly?

that is all
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,773
Reputation
12,408
Daps
195,271
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
that wasn't the claim, the claim was if Bernie who was able to invigorate the youth couldn't do it again with more years to prepare and more resources, why should that be a demographic that's counted on? how many phantom candidates are going to do that for congressional and presidential elections? and repeatedly?

that is all
An interesting thread would be who are the progressive candidates we should be looking at in 2024 on a national level. HL has us well educated on the shytiness of our current political sludge, but I’m all ears to hear who they think can unite the nation :blessed:
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,157
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,846
Reppin
CookoutGang
The worst part is that our discussion wasn't about who won. The claim was "Bernie doesn't inspire youth turnout more than other Dems". I proved that Bernie inspired RECORD youth turnout in Iowa 2020 with a MASSIVE portion of the youth vote going to him. Pete's youth vote was ass. So how is the claim, "But Pete won!" anything other than a deflection from the actual argument?
That isn't the argument because that was never the threshold. As you pointed out yourself, Bernie was supposed to unlock so many low turnout voter groups that he would outweigh his lag with other, more traditional dem groups.

He didn't in 2016 and as Dora pointed out, he didnt in 2020 either.

#1. The first thing that matters is turnout. Sanders is the BEST candidate for increasing turnout. He's the favorite among latinos, the favorite among young people, the favorite among independents, the favorite among young blacks. NO ONE reaches those traditional low-turnout groups like he does. And the vast majority of them are gonna go blue down-ballot.

That alone will make Bernie a net positive for the down-ballot races no matter what else happens.

I just laid it out for you - Sanders is the best candidate for down-ballot voters and you can't make a logical argument otherwise. If anyone REALLY thinks there's a different argument, then show me EXACT where those extra votes for Republicans would come from and why the extra votes from new pro-Bernie voters wouldn't vastly outweigh them.
Let's just replace Republicans with democrats since we're talking about the primary.





Tuesday was a bad day for Bernie Sanders. The Vermont senator lost decisively to former Vice President Joe Biden in Michigan, Missouri, and Mississippi. Sanders is falling behind in the delegate count, and in 25 primaries and caucuses so far, he has managed to crack 37 percent of the vote in only three, even as the field has narrowed. This low ceiling is the story of his demise. Sanders hasn’t just failed to bring millions of new voters into the process, as he promised. He has also failed, in state after state, to broaden his share of the existing Democratic electorate.

You're the only one here attempting to still beat on this drum.

And no, I don't want to here about the establishment stopping him either.



You gotta let this go. :scust:
 
Top