Cold War II: The United States vs Trump and Co. A Russian Affair

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
10,821
Reputation
1,341
Daps
30,009
Reppin
Houston TX
Depends on your view. But my view is that that representatives should reflect their constituency. If the constituency is not holding them accountable by making their voices hears either through calls, protest or the ballot box they're a part of the problems.

I think he should be impeached. So does my district and my representative reflects that.

I think that is the proper order.

Only 36 percent of Americans think Trump should be impeached.

Despite 8 in 10 dems thinking Trump tried to obstruct justice.

:yeshrug:

They are representing an ignorant constituency. They should not reflect ignorance, they should educate.

They have a responsibility to take things like the 400+ Mueller report, which most people will never read and convey it to the people in a way that can be easily understood. That is why they did things like hold the Mueller hearing, to inform people about what is going on. Also when they choose to go to the media and advocate against impeachment, they are helping to drive down support.

They have no problem advocating for things they think are important. I don't have the numbers but I'd bet the bank bailout for example did not have a large amount of support from constituents. And if that specific example does not work, I'm sure we can find a different one.

I've already acknowledged that the constituents are a part of the problem also, but that does not absolve the reps from blame.
 

Propaganda

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
5,494
Reputation
1,355
Daps
18,230
Reppin
416


what the fukk is it that they need exactly? and after all this stonewalling, why the fukk do they think they're gonna get anything from the trump administration?

these motherfukkers have already been out there saying he's unfit, corrupt, criminal, damaging to institutions/democracy/world status/etc, racist, immoral, self-serving and on and on and on. they're going out saying trump committed obstruction of justice for fukk's sake, they're saying trump committed crimes. b-b-but... :whoa:

these people are so goddamn frustrating.:elliot:
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
31,762
Reputation
9,641
Daps
106,908
Reppin
Brooklyn
what the fukk is it that they need exactly? and after all this stonewalling, why the fukk do they think they're gonna get anything from the trump administration?

these motherfukkers have already been out there saying he's unfit, corrupt, criminal, damaging to institutions/democracy/world status/etc, racist, immoral, self-serving and on and on and on. they're going out saying trump committed obstruction of justice for fukk's sake, they're saying trump committed crimes. b-b-but... :whoa:

these people are so goddamn frustrating.:elliot:
Gaslighting by a complicit or compromised speaker
 

Blackgate

💩🔛🤡🤡🤡
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
1,268
Reputation
290
Daps
5,043
one day it is: pelosi refusing to impeach because it will help trump or whatever...

the next day: pelosi saying she will impeach when the time is right...


playing both sides?...stalling?...i caint figure out what that woman is doing...:patrice:
 
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
7,901
Reputation
915
Daps
24,485
Reppin
Philadelphia
one day it is: pelosi refusing to impeach because it will help trump or whatever...

the next day: pelosi saying she will impeach when the time is right...


playing both sides?...stalling?...i caint figure out what that woman is doing...:patrice:
She is collecting donations
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,505
Daps
37,703
They clearly want the grand jury information and primary source evidence that's being withheld so they can make their own case and not rely on Mueller as they had before.

They also want to follow the court system and compel testimony and evidence from people.
No they don’t. They are wasting time. This I need to cross every T and dot every I act is very corny.
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,753
Reputation
5,825
Daps
113,871
https://www.thecoli.com/threads/her...-ban-bet-seth-rich-was-the-dnc-leaker.722901/


if you think all of the following information is fake/false, prove you confidence in the official story in the ban bet above.
_____________________


Seth Rich leaked the DNC emails and Russiagate was a conspiracy theory perpetuated by the Obama administration and Clinton campaign team in conjunction with FBI, intelligence communities, and left wing media in a desperate attempt to keep trump out of office.

They did not want trump out/gone because he is a racist cac.


They wanted trump out/gone because he is not in the club.

They spied on the repulican Candidates and rigged the primaries against the Democrat candidates.

They used every possible method to ensure a Clinton victory.

Seth Rich leaked the documents and they killed him for it. Police cam footage has been conveniently lost

There are confirmed 32 pages of confidential transcripts regarding communication between Seth Rich and Wikileaks.

Mueller did not investigate Seth Rich's laptop.

Mueller did not make Assange, who was directly involved, testify nor did he ask for the evidence Assange has gone on record as saying he had, and was happily willing to share.

Mueller did not ask Kim Dot Com to testify, even though KIm had his legal counsel write an open letter to Mueller, stating that he had evidence he helped Seth leak the documents and was happy to provide the evidence suggesting such.

Mueller, in his sworn testimony declined to answer the simple question of whether Joseph Nifsud (russian operative as defined by mueller), was indeed a WESTERN operative.

Russiagate wasnt supposed to continue after a trump win. It was supposed to end after a clinton win.

We have been forced to watch what is essentially a train crash in slow motion, over 2 years.

This was the biggest cover up in american history.

One can't help but think about what is in the emails that required such a vast, expensive, and frankly desperate cover up.

Then we remember the emails provided to us already paint a bit of the story.

-Pedophile code language in emails speaking to John Podesta, emails referring to activities enjoyed by Barack Obama, as well as disturbing code language in the IG accounts of those connected to podesta thru Alefantis

-emails discussing CHILDREN (11, 9, and UNDER 7 being TRANSPORTED to a HOT TUB, for further ENTERTAINMENT.

And to this day no part of left-wing media addressed these specific emails to provide so much as a spin or deflection. Red flag.

And you fukking idiots have been entertaining and defending this clown shyt conspiracy theory for years... Not Knowing your ignorance equates to doing the bidding of the Pedophile ran democratic establishment, and being complicit in covering up the literal real life version of Eyes Wide Shut.

And the beginning of the end begins now.

Are you mad?
About to type up a spin?
Do you think im wrong?

Reported me for false info? Ban bet me then. How SURE are you that im wrong? Sure enough to put your account on the line? We'll see.

https://www.thecoli.com/threads/her...-ban-bet-seth-rich-was-the-dnc-leaker.722901/

Christ. You are clearly an agent. Stay in your lane with your music and don't dirty up these threads with this tinfoil hat shyt.

Reported.
 

jj23

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Messages
24,753
Reputation
5,825
Daps
113,871
rEpOrTeD :mjlol: yall some little ass kids.

Find the inaccuracies in my post or shut up.

"Tin foil hat shyt" = shyt you can't refute with facts so you just label it and move on. Lazy and symptomatic of a lack of research.

You can't report a post because you don't like it. Threads are allowed to have conflicting views. Half the shyt here didn't turn out true. Grow up. Build an argument if it bothers you so much.

And if you are confident all of my post is bs, sign up for the ban bet. But you wont. You aren't confident in your knowledge. You seek refuge in this thread because it is a safe space.

Ban Bet :hula: Shut Up

You are derailing this thread and you should be banned again. All of the websites you quoted are questionable. No one cares about your ban bet. You dont have enough credibility for anyone to make a bet with you. At this stage your delusion is just sad.

You dont believe the words the come out of your own president's mouth and the racist shyt he has spewed but you want to derail this thread with Seth Rich conspiracy theories. Raise that shyt in TLR. No one here care for your stories.

This is the last time I will engage with you.

Reported again.
 

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,405
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
I'm conflicted.

On the one hand you might be right. Look at how complacent old Dem voters are in 2019. Now imagine if they were 15 years younger and all the miserable cacs who've died since then we're still around registered as anti-busing Dems

On the other hand I don't believe that Dems are motivated by hate the same way you describe. The Dems never win the White House since WW2 but when they do it's been a young, inspiring candidate running against an established and largely inoffensive republican. Prove me wrong, but I don't think there are any exceptions to this rule in the last 60 years?

And electing young inspiring candidates vs inoffensive established ones doesn't feel the same as the hate based voting motivation that you describe
I'm trying to think of a time where Dems are more motivated than now to vote based on emotion and I can't think of one. Dems aren't an easily angered bunch because their political views aren't emotion based. But I think when Dem values are under attack you seem them mobilize to perform an action. So it only makes sense to me that Dems will mobilize to vote. As you point out though, there isn't much history to base that off of.

I already see the machine working to quell those fires though. Using Dem strategy on this impeachment process to say "this is gonna backfire come election time" and telling Dems to turn on each other.
 

dtownreppin214

l'immortale
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
55,650
Reputation
10,526
Daps
191,844
Reppin
Shags & Leathers
Brehs please take a few minutes and watch these two videos. Compare the mush mouth messaging from the New Jersey DEMOCRAT House Rep vs Joe Scarborough's #MoscowMitch rant.

Joe had #MoscowMitch trending #1 on Twitter yesterday. Meanwhile, The NJ rep actually said that McConnell wasn't taking up the House bills because THE DEMS are focusing too much on Mueller. :mindblown:

I just don't get why Republicans are so much better salesmen? :mindblown:

This is why the majority of polling shows Americans are still against impeachment. The Dems cannot sell shyt to the public.





@Pressure @Jhoon @FAH1223 @Ebonic Plague @88m3 @jj23 @AZBeauty @fact @Orbital-Fetus @BigMoneyGrip @ADevilYouKhow @Mantis Toboggan M.D. @Dameon Farrow @Tommy Fits @ExodusNirvana @NY's #1 Draft Pick @LeVraiPapi @mastermind @Tony D'Amato @Cali_livin @Cole Cash @Dorian Breh @dora_da_destroyer

Here's another video. Compare mush mouth Begala to Amanda Carpenter. The Republican makes the clearer case against Trump.

 
Last edited:
Top