CNN anchor Isha Sesay ‘Pregnant From Sperm Bank Clinic And Single’ at 46

[Wiseborn]

It's a man's responsibility to not handover his DNA to a random woman. Because it's not up to you what she does with it afterwards since you willingly gave it away. That's the rules.

No. again you're aguing against natural law while arguing for natural law.

If a woman can have a baby on her own then she can have a baby on her own

We already see the ünregulated sperm bank system and you can't say the word "Joo" on facebook but there's tons of facebook group for this illegal unethical and immoral activity.

Again this shows that shorty doesn't even know any Men, She obviously didn't know any Man willing to give her a sample much less willing to pipe her out.

Because like all other women in her situation she would've went for the "get piped out by her boyfriend and having an oops baby""

Probably the white boy she married bushed her he clearly wasn't with providing a sample.

 

[Wiseborn]

Ridiculously impossible princess like standards high earning Black women have. They eventually back themselves into a corner.

Am sure there's plenty of brehs that would have willingly donated sperm in that cnn building, but she'd never consider the mail room dudes or cameramen.
Julia Roberts got taken by the cameraman..

They have ridiculous standards for Black Men we see the goofy looking white boy she married.


Julia Roberts (who I don't think is cute) is one of those "cute girls" who likes dating Ügly dudes" she was married to the vice president of Ugly Gang Lyle Lovett

 

[DON MA MA]

No. again you're aguing against natural law while arguing for natural law.

If a woman can have a baby on her own then she can have a baby on her own

We already see the ünregulated sperm bank system and you can't say the word "Joo" on facebook but there's tons of facebook group for this illegal unethical and immoral activity.

Again this shows that shorty doesn't even know any Men, She obviously didn't know any Man willing to give her a sample much less willing to pipe her out.

Because like all other women in her situation she would've went for the "get piped out by her boyfriend and having an oops baby""

Probably the white boy she married bushed her he clearly wasn't with providing a sample.

Nope. Its never worked like this and you're in fantasyland. You don't give away your DNA willingly then complain later. The world don't work like that.

The only thing protecting sperm donors is organized contracts between 2 party's and the organization. Anything else is just opinion.

 

[Wiseborn]

Nope. Its never worked like this and you're in fantasyland. You don't give away your DNA willingly then complain later. The world don't work like that.

The only thing protecting sperm donors is organized contracts between 2 party's and the organization. Anything else is just opinion.

Just think of how Goofy that sounds You can seed up a zillion bytches as long as you do it through a sperm bank without legal consequence, but a bytch can fish out a condom from a trash can and it's the Man's fault because he "gave away his seed""
That dude who literally seeded up all those women in the netflix doc technically didn't break the law, I think they got him for fraud for lying about using his own seed instead of those on the pictures.

Not to mention paternity fraud where a nikka could not be the father at all but if he signs the birth certificate he's legally the father.

Legally that doesn't make sense again natural law isn't fair but the lagal system is based on a system of fairness.

 

[Windows 91]

My aunt had her youngest at 38-39 and she's self-conscious about being the oldest mom at school events and dance recitals. All my cousin's friends have mom's that are 10-15 years younger.

Can't imagine having a newborn at 46. And trying to raise a teenager as a senior citizen would be a nightmare. No way she'll be able to control a teen at 60+, kid will be doing whatever they want.

 

[Wiseborn]

My aunt had her youngest at 38-39 and she's self-conscious about being the oldest mom at school events and dance recitals. All my cousin's friends have mom's that are 10-15 years younger.

Can't imagine having a newborn at 46. And trying to raise a teenager as a senior citizen would be a nightmare. No way she'll be able to control a teen at 60+, kid will be doing whatever they want.

exactly. She won't have the same frame of reference culturally Culture changes every ten to 20 years the music that her child will be into will be radically different from her and she won't be able to relate. Not to mention the clowning the child will get from being a test tube baby amoung the elite white folks with two parent families.

If the kid turns out to be a daughter she won't have the moral authority to tell her daughter to not have sex.

She'll be like Barrack Obama allowing the cac boyfriend of his daughter to pipe her out in his house.

 

[DON MA MA]

Just think of how Goofy that sounds You can seed up a zillion bytches as long as you do it through a sperm bank without legal consequence, but a bytch can fish out a condom from a trash can and it's the Man's fault because he "gave away his seed""
That dude who literally seeded up all those women in the netflix doc technically didn't break the law, I think they got him for fraud for lying about using his own seed instead of those on the pictures.

Not to mention paternity fraud where a nikka could not be the father at all but if he signs the birth certificate he's legally the father.

Legally that doesn't make sense again natural law isn't fair but the lagal system is based on a system of fairness.

It's not goofy at all. You use contracts for everything. Housing, food, employment etc... this is a document used for the sole purpose of delegating RESPONSIBILITY. Why wouldn't you use it before giving away your DNA to rid yourself of responsibility, especially if the other party agrees and you know the consequence of not doing so. You're living in some ideological bubble that can't be used in any other situation. That's not reality.

Most women aren't getting pregnant from trash condoms because of sperm not being able to live for long once it touches oxygen. But again why would you have your sperm laying around openly with a woman you can't trust. I stick my keys in my pocket around criminals.

The paternity fraud cases with the circumstance you listed are mostly resolved in favor of the defrauded. Its very rare for courts to force men who aren't the father by DNA to be forced to continue as the Father.

Like I said dudes like to pretend they don't know law to push illogical point. The fairness of the law is this, if there is no contract of responsibility before conception the state will have to pay for your baby, so the state will then sue you.

If there is a contract of responsibility before conception the state will sue the mother for any services given by them.

That is fair.

 

[Duke Wy Lin]

So she could not find ONE man?

Sounds like the problem is her

The problem is that she likely prioritized her career throughout her 20s and 30s. Meaning she probably rejected men who, on face value, would've been decent fathers. Then in her mid to late 30s the desire to have a family settled in. The problem is that as a woman, the quality of men that are available to you in the dating pool becomes worse over time the longer you wait, which is something many women only realize when it's too late. You simply have access to higher quality men as a woman when you're younger as opposed to later in life when most good men have already left the dating pool. If you're in your 30s or 40s the men your age group will be looking for younger women, so you'll likely have to settle for men that are even older than you and those men tend to come with some baggage.

So yes, she probably could've found a husband even at 40+ but she would've had to make some serious compromises.

 

[Wiseborn]

It's not goofy at all. You use contracts for everything. Housing, food, employment etc... this is a document used for the sole purpose of delegating RESPONSIBILITY. Why wouldn't you use it before giving away your DNA to rid yourself of responsibility, especially if the other party agrees and you know the consequence of not doing so. You're living in some ideological bubble that can't be used in any other situation. That's not reality.

Most women aren't getting pregnant from trash condoms because of sperm not being able to live for long once it touches oxygen. But again why would you have your sperm laying around openly with a woman you can't trust. I stick my keys in my pocket around criminals.

The paternity fraud cases with the circumstance you listed are mostly resolved in favor of the defrauded. Its very rare for courts to force men who aren't the father by DNA to be forced to continue as the Father.

Like I said dudes like to pretend they don't know law to push illogical point. The fairness of the law is this if there is no contract of responsibility before conception the state will have to pay for your baby, so the state will then sue you.

If there is a contract of responsibility before conception the state will sue the mother for any services given by them.

That is fair.

My guy you're just repeating butta babble once a child support order is awarded it's set in stone dudes who find out later that there was fraud don't get their money back and the women never gets in any trouble it's hard to even get the child support order stopped. Child support is the only debt owed to a person that you can't escape by declaring bankruptcy the only one where you can go to jail. Cash in hand payments don't even count if it doesn't go through the government it doesn't count.

Why can't the whole process in every case be covered by a contract? Technically the ünregulated system" or nut in a cup is a contract too but that's non binding but sperm banks are? (until they aren't) what is the regulated body that governs sperm banks? why are they considered trust worthy? There's a reason that every medical doctor gets malpractice insurance.

 

[J.E.T.S]

Huh? Do all kids missing a father, or mother, grow up to be werirdos and “fakkits”? Why is this destined to happen to her? And what about those from a two parent household who grew up to be weirdos and fags? Y’all really be out there with the lack of reasoning

Most of them.

Why do you think the stigma exists that a child growing up in a single parent home and being successful/educated is “beating the odds”?

 

[Wiseborn]

The problem is that she likely prioritized her career throughout her 20s and 30s. Meaning she probably rejected men who, on face value, would've been decent fathers. Then in her mid to late 30s the desire to have a family settled in. The problem is that as a woman, the quality of men that are available to you in the dating pool becomes worse over time the longer you wait, which is something many women only realize when it's too late. You simply have access to higher quality men as a woman when you're younger as opposed to later in life when most good men have already left the dating pool. If you're in your 30s or 40s the men your age group will be looking for younger women, so you'll likely have to settle for men that are even older than you and those men tend to come with some baggage.

So yes, she probably could've found a husband even at 40+ but she would've had to make some serious compromises.

Not only that but there's the hypergamy factor she was constantly around lit nikkas so the nikkas willing to deal with her didn't seem worthy to her.

She was doubly fukked because she was an international journalist. She had to go where the story was maybe her dude wouldn't want her to go to warzones

 

[DON MA MA]

My guy you're just repeating butta babble once a child support order is awarded it's set in stone dudes who find out later that there was fraud don't get their money back and the women never gets in any trouble it's hard to even get the child support order stopped. Child support is the only debt owed to a person that you can't escape by declaring bankruptcy the only one where you can go to jail. Cash in hand payments don't even count if it doesn't go through the government it doesn't count.

Why can't the whole process in every case be covered by a contract? Technically the ünregulated system" or nut in a cup is a contract too but that's non binding but sperm banks are? (until they aren't) what is the regulated body that governs sperm banks? why are they considered trust worthy? There's a reason that every medical doctor gets malpractice insurance.

The bolded is a lie.
Plenty of men have got their money back or close to it in civil court. I can tell you don't know much about this subject.

The debt isn't owed to the person. The debt is owed to the state. The state can even put interest on it for being late. Once again I'm sure you aren't familiar with child support. If you are ask yourself why you are sending payments through the attorney general....

As far as "Why can't the whole process in every case be covered by a contract?"
It is. That's what we've been talking bout. The problem is some people who aren't proactive in the process don't like the outcomes.

 

[Wiseborn]

The bolded is a lie.
Plenty of men have got their money back or close to it in civil court. I can tell you don't know much about this subject.

The debt isn't owed to the person. The debt is owed to the state. The state can even put interest on it for being late. Once again I'm sure you aren't familiar with child support. If you are ask yourself why you are sending payments through the attorney general....

As far as "Why can't the whole process in every case be covered by a contract?"
It is. That's what we've been talking bout. The problem is some people who aren't proactive in the process don't like the outcomes.

post an example of dudes getting frauded and getting their money back just one.

Besides how could they get the money back if you correctly said that the money is owed to the state and not the bytch. The state is collecting the money to give to the bytch. The state or the bytch can't be sued (I'm basing this off of never heard or anyone suiing) in this situation and the bytch gets no trouble for lying even if you could prove that she knew (which she should always know)

I'm coming off the top of the head (I'm actually in Spanish class) you're checking butta talking points to justify this bullshyt.

 

[dora_da_destroyer]

Most of them.

Why do you think the stigma exists that a child growing up in a single parent home and being successful/educated is “beating the odds”?

Because kids in typical single mother households are disproportionately in poor/low income households and those where a mother wasn’t prepared to nor wanted to be a single mother

Women becoming single moms by choice is like 2% of parents, the outcomes their kids have can’t sway or offset the data of that of what is the typical single mother

Children in single-mother-by-choice families do just as well as those in two-parent families

A study comparing the well-being of children growing up in single-mother-by-choice and heterosexual two-parent families has found no differences in terms of parent-child relationship or child development. However, the study did find that the single-mothers-by-choice did have a greater social...

www.sciencedaily.com

 

[DON MA MA]

post an example of dudes getting frauded and getting their money back just one.

Besides how could they get the money back if you correctly said that the money is owed to the state and not the bytch. The state is collecting the money to give to the bytch. The state or the bytch can't be sued (I'm basing this off of never heard or anyone suiing) in this situation and the bytch gets no trouble for lying even if you could prove that she knew (which she should always know)

I'm coming off the top of the head (I'm actually in Spanish class) you're checking butta talking points to justify this bullshyt.

Na I won't because that would require me to look up a family court case result that was then used to file suit in civil court.

By law, Paternity fraud is a crime that can be used to file a civil suit. So if you've been defrauded you can recoup your losses legally.

You won't need to sue the state because the mother committed the crime. So you sue the criminal. State is only involved because of the services rendered.

Nothing you've said is factual, legal or logical. Even this "butta talking point" thing you keep saying is just a cop out for you not knowing the law, the reason behind the law and facts surrounding child support.

Once again you living in a fantasy the reality is if you willingly give away your DNA to a random woman it will not benefit you. So crying about it later is useless.