Clinton Donors Have Picked Their 2020 Democratic Presidential Nominee

Eddy Gordo

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,147
Reputation
615
Daps
13,879
I would say she has her work cut out for her to become the Democratic nominee. Let's say through some fluke she manages to get out of the primaries. Nothing on that list is a deal breaker for the American electorate. She would literally be a more competent, more intelligent trump. With marginally less bullshytting.:ld:
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
109,184
Reputation
14,206
Daps
312,314
Reppin
NULL
if only you and your ilk voted for anybody but trump
if only the democrats had run bernie sanders :yeshrug:

exactly what significant bloc of whillary voters would they have lost? i ask because itll be relevant in 3 years
 

Pull Up the Roots

Breakfast for dinner.
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
25,023
Reputation
11,874
Daps
108,118
Reppin
Detroit
I would say she has her work cut out for her to become the Democratic nominee. Let's say through some fluke she manages to get out of the primaries. Nothing on that list is a deal breaker for the American electorate. She would literally be a more competent, more intelligent trump. With marginally less bullshytting.:ld:
The trip to Syria and the sponsors of that trip would bury her.

I dont see the issue TBH if Trump flounders she could get alot of his supporters
The fact that she has crossover appeal with Trump supporters should be a concern.

 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,668
Reputation
7,272
Daps
151,422
Reppin
CookoutGang
if only the democrats had run bernie sanders :yeshrug:

exactly what significant bloc of whillary voters would they have lost? i ask because itll be relevant in 3 years
A lot of people who use this logic also say thier vote didn't matter because their state was either deep blue or deep red.

:PatriceTrump:
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
16,626
Reputation
4,588
Daps
45,065
She won't be the nominee. Someone will run a populist campaign in the crowded Democratic primary and defeat the Clinton axis.
I could easily see Harris, or whoever the establishment/Clinton wing hand picks, running as a populist, then doing a 180 when they get in office. I call it the Barry-shnikov :obama:.
 

Eddy Gordo

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
4,147
Reputation
615
Daps
13,879
The trip to Syria and the sponsors of that trip would bury her.


The fact that she has crossover appeal with Trump supporters should be a concern.


I don't think it would. Most Americans are dumb and don't have any notion of the Syrian conflict or it's causes. Trump was praising duerte and kim jong. Gary Johnson didn't know where Aleppo was. Understanding geopolitics, hell basic geography only matters if you trying to get the educated vote.

And her having support from the other side of the aisle doesn't diminish her chances of winning. It increases them.:francis:

You don't have to like it. It is the reality though.
 

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Superstar
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
6,467
Reputation
132
Daps
15,669
Dems would be better off running a governor who's had success.

Congress has been pretty :scust:.

This

Dems are obsessed with the appeal but not the experience.

For example, I think Bernie is dope too but can he work in Washington as a leader to get things done?
 
Top