Wu-tang are not polished. That's a massive aspect of their appeal and even hip hop in general. You add polish and you kill the vibe. Polish in general kills soul. and I'd argue that Wu as a whole are some of the most soulful rappers ever.
M.E.T.H.O.D Man is better than ANY track on Wu Forever. Better beat, more personality, catchier and more memorable rhymes... (
Fading mothafukkas like bleach! -- That shyt had me
back in the day. It's still a fantastic simile)
shytty sounding? How exactly does a gritty aesthetic wear off when it's the founding aspect of this whole hip hop shyt? Grit defines hip hop.
Da Mystery of Chessboxin is also better than most tracks on Forever.
Forever marked the fall-off of the Wu. and listening to it in retrospect, it's easy to see why. That's why Ghost had to take it back to the rawness with Supreme Clientele, and we mark it today as one of the best rap albums ever made.
so you're saying the content on Wu Forever is more diverse? can you provide receipts?
And even if it were more diverse, that's good and I can give a point for that but not much more than that.
It's not that subjective anymore. It's been 20+ years since 36 came out. There is a noticeable consensus that says 36 is better than Forever. And it's not a forced consensus. It came about naturally.
what are peak tracks on Wu Forever and AEOM?
Not super polished, but more polished. Plus what's wrong with the group evolving and expanding their sound? Yes, of course, we all love that gritty lo-fi shyt but tbh man you sound like one of those fans reluctant to let go of 36 Chambers, and won't accept a different sound. Wu Forever isn't A Better Tomorrow (album) level of fukkery. It still had a gritty undertone and some songs straight up sound like 36 Chambers extras e.g. Deadly Melody.
You gonna pretend that OB4CL was 36 Chambers level of gritty? Hell nah. Ironman was smooth and soulful as fukk. You don't complain about those. Wu was just the culmination of all these things into a grander sound that OB4CL and Ironman were working towards. Then you STILL had the grungy shyt like ODB and Meth solos and GZA has a perfect marriage of both avenues, but mainly the gritty and dark sound of 36.
Na bruh grit doesn't define hip-hop, it defines a section of hip-hop. Let's just erase ATCQ, De La Soul and all them from the history books then, right?
Forever wasn't the fall-off. It was everything after RZA's 5-year plan that was poor in comparison, especially Bobby Digital shyt, Tical 2000 (good stuff but not nearly to THAT level of 93-97 Wu material) etc. UNTIL Supreme Clientele came out, and truth be told Ghost has carried the name on his back ever since.
Wu Forever has not necessarily more DIVERSE stuff, but the ratio of brag/other songs is more equal than on 36.
So let's say CREAM, Can It Be and Tearz are the 'focused/non-brag/battle' songs of sort (loose term but you know what I mean). Forever has Older Gods, Maria, Impossible, A Better Tomorrow, Bells of War, The M.G.M., The City, The Projects etc. That's also to be expected with a double album of more tracks mind you, but it remains true regardless.
It is subjective. That 36 is a better album is down to the impact it made, the reception it got, the appreciation for production that gave the Wu a certain appeal and character, the whole 9 MC's (we've never seen this before) shyt. Plus not to mention, it has NO filler that is even questionable because every track bangs and is close to perfect. Wu Forever is a double album, immediately sets it as a disadvantage.
Now in terms of ranking tracks, when I get to the library soon I'll do a tier list of Wu Forever tracks, just so you get an idea of what I'm thinking and how it compares to AEOM.