China told the Biden Administration during a meeting " We are an Equal Now" dikkup
- Thread starter Leasy
- Start date
China was on that No Limit in 96 shyt. While the country was going in flames, China came out with Ghetto D
This whole statement is so ridiculous
It is not.
By your logic, houses in China and all over the world have been burnt down because US has held power since WW2.
I was thinking about this last wk. The story is bleak.
If we assume South Africa is comprimised until further notice; then the strongest contender wouldve been Nigeria. But it kindof imploded this last summer with the sars/haram/instability so the field of black contenders is currently empty.
At the same time, Western Hemisphere is too destabalized to produce black change. Jamaica wouldve been a good option based on Arable land, population, education, etc, but their internal politics is whack. Their economy is also too reliant on a few weak industries. We can also assume that Black-latin America is just as compromised as South Africa for similar reasons.
As odd as it sounds, Eastern Africa may legitimately be the only stable group of black people on Earth; however, TZ is dealing with power transition,Rwanda has education but its inconsequentially small, and despite its education and diversified domestic economy Kenya has a marginal stake of the global economy(outside of tea). Im also worried that now that Uganda found oil with the Russians, Uganda may fall into a resource trap like congo.
@GrindtooFilthy , what do you think of an individual focused solution, as opposed to a national population one? Imagine the change if any if these nations had a single leader like Bismarck, Mao, Talleyrand, or Xiaoping , who could tactfully play the global powers against eachother to build their home nation in the process. I may be wrong on this, but it seems like most of the post50s wealthy nations had leaders who grew their nations in tandem with existing powers, instead of antagonizing them. It does not escape me that China itself did this with Russia(under Mao) and with the US(under Xiaopeng) to get to where China is today. Any thoughts?
Insensitive
Superstar
No.
It doesn't.
The views you are espousing are not pro-black.
Reevaluate your views and see why you cannot be "pro-black" and defend or ignore the terrors
America has inflicted on the world ESPECIALLY Black people.
What they have done is HORRIFIC.
If you really are black, I got love for you but I'm going to tell you right now, you got it wrong.
Control of the resources doesn't mean you don't share access to them, for a price.
Well all bets were off once the clown of a country we call America elected Trump.. world leaders saw that and essentially looked at the USA as food going forward..wow...Xi was talking shyt but its facts
america hasnt even begun to fix the racial issues and has no ground to stand on criticizing others...
Pres XI didn’t tell any lies tho..
Facts, I didn't realize just how much fellow "ados" considered themselves a part of this system. I'm conviced that a lot of these brothers wish they were born white, they walk lock step on ever issue already, and if so would probably turn a blind eye to global white supremacy.
Folks sounding like battered hoes in here, fukking Stockholm syndrome. Many these doods is too far gone to truly consider things objectively. China don't care about us! Like they give a shyt about Chinese Uyghurs
Thats what it's about breh, leverage.
And consider it just from a fundamental market standpoint, isn't "competition" beneficial to the consumer, in this case citizens? You'd think if more people might explore partnership/collaboration with a competing govt entity and her policies, these govts would be forced to examine their policies making them more competitive.
And I feel that's what them African countries is doing, shopping their best interests. That's what you sposed to do, play two adversaries against each other, have them both out their bids in in order to maximize your own claim, your own interests.
I shake my head when folks talk about real systemic change, economical/political power or even reparations. Uncle Sam knows most yal scared negroes aint going nowhere, he got you trained to not trust anyone or anything not "English". Convinced that it would be worse outside his total control. Why he gone "empower" yal? Yal already beating the hell out of his drums.
Not sure what you driving at. I don't agree that it's a zero sum game. No one country controls all resources and power. And I would never want it that way. Competition is good
Insensitive
Superstar
No. You see, it's not just that "It's not perfect".
THEY MURDERD OUR LEADERS IN COLD fukkING BLOOD.
THAT IS A U T H O R I T A R I A N.
No.Grassroots movements got us to where we are today, and can still make a difference. I haven't given up hope.
They didn't.
IF they did, our social programs wouldn't be being completely eroded away under the guise of stopping "Welfare queens"(ADOS Woman
stereotype) and "Immigrants".
IF they did, the Black Middle Class wouldn't be eroding away with many of us falling BACK into poverty.
IF they did, the panthers and many others would have stopped police brutality FIFTY fukkING YEARS AGO.
Mind you. ALL OF THEM spoke out against this.
And almost all of them are dead or jailed.
pro-Capitalist, exploited proletariat Babble.
Ask Black America how capitalism has treated us.
Matter of fact, I'll go down to Watts right now and ask the homies on Grape Street did
Amerikkka do right by them.
How about I go back in time and ask Nat Turner was it dope being exploited to make Slave Owners rich.
I almost let that slide.
NO BLUE MAGA Apologetics should get the pass on a "Pro-black" website.
China gave the US the greatest gameplan, actually help the black citizens and you can be a major power.
A developed and economically improved black person is a better America in technology, science and global dominance. But racism is too important.
China can put people in camps and control aspects of their citizens lives but they don't allow that to stop the development of their economy and purpose.
Until then, you're not seeing us, says China.
And I agree. Of course people are going to miss the game and play hypothetical battles in here.
America doesn't have a conscience. This goes back to the Asian values vs democracy installation debate of the 80s and 90s.
Actually even before that, when England was sending opium to China and the US had a hand in it.
Insensitive
Superstar
China gave the US the greatest gameplan, actually help the black citizens and you can be a major power.
A developed and economically improved black person is a better America in technology, science and global dominance. But racism is too important.
China can put people in camps and control aspects of their citizens lives but they don't allow that to stop the development of their economy and purpose.
Until then, you're not seeing us, says China.
And I agree. Of course people are going to miss the game and play hypothetical battles in here.
American's so racist they fukked trillions out of their own economy.
Yah hate to see it.
Yes. That Actually Happened. This is a LINK TO AN NPR Article About it.
I was thinking about this last wk. The story is bleak.
If we assume South Africa is comprimised until further notice; then the strongest contender wouldve been Nigeria. But it kindof imploded this last summer with the sars/haram/instability so the field of black contenders is currently empty.
At the same time, Western Hemisphere is too destabalized to produce black change. Jamaica wouldve been a good option based on Arable land, population, education, etc, but their internal politics is whack. Their economy is also too reliant on a few weak industries. We can also assume that Black-latin America is just as compromised as South Africa for similar reasons.
As odd as it sounds, Eastern Africa may legitimately be the only stable group of black people on Earth; however, TZ is dealing with power transition,Rwanda has education but its inconsequentially small, and despite its education and diversified domestic economy Kenya has a marginal stake of the global economy(outside of tea). Im also worried that now that Uganda found oil with the Russians, Uganda may fall into a resource trap like congo.
@GrindtooFilthy , what do you think of an individual focused solution, as opposed to a national population one? Imagine the change if any if these nations had a single leader like Bismarck, Mao, Talleyrand, or Xiaoping , who could tactfully play the global powers against eachother to build their home nation in the process. I may be wrong on this, but it seems like most of the post50s wealthy nations had leaders who grew their nations in tandem with existing powers, instead of antagonizing them. It does not escape me that China itself did this with Russia(under Mao) and with the US(under Xiaopeng) to get to where China is today. Any thoughts?
I still think that the first African superpower of the modern era will be Ethiopia(if they get they're internal issues under control) or an East African Federation of some sort
Ethiopia honestly should have had something similar to a "Meiji" restoration in the 19th century or early twentieth century
The second point is a good one, although I wasn't the one addressed. It'll be near to impossible for an African power to grow without an alliance with the West or the East. Ideally this leader would be an expert in playing each side against the other for the benefit of his people, and would be able to quell the inevitable internal dissent.
