Here is my search history in the two Nate Parker threads I participated in.
In the first thread, many of the post aren't even about Nate Parker (they were tangent arguments) and in every post that I mentioned Nate Parker, I acknowledged that he was found not guilty. So how is that going in on him again?
http://www.thecoli.com/search/5939450/?page=2
My very first post in the thread below (and at the time my only planned posted) I asked people, regardless of what they thought about the case, to be protect their future sons against similar charges by instructing them about the dangers of having sex with drunk women (but to you that is going in on Nate Parker). Then people started quoting me and going on tangents.
http://www.thecoli.com/search/5939471/
None of my post in this third thread even reference Nate Parker at all; they focused how it was wrong to generalized.
http://www.thecoli.com/search/5939489/
I can't remember which thread, but I'm almost certain the I only went into one or two of these threads because I was TAGGED. Otherwise, I wouldn't have commented in the thread. Just like if you hadn't tagged me, I would not have come into this thread. I never advocated for anyone to boycott Nate Parker and never stated that I was boycotting him.
Second, I barely even post on the coli anymore. I check every few days and comment when I am TAGGED in a specific thread. So please go on with your bullshyt about me going in on Nate Parker.
Finally, in regard to this thread, I don't even know who the fukk Casey Affleck is. If he is a predator or a rapist, I hope he is tried in a court of law as well and I hope people don't support him. I know that I DON'T support him; I don't even know who the mofo is and when I clicked that link, I can honestly say I've never seen one of his movies and don't plan too. Happy?