So? He’s right about intelligence and the history.
Everything he's saying is either already known, or just his own opinion and I care nothing for his opinion.
1. Everyone knows that US signals intel is most likely what Canada was alluding to. That was logically obvious. There's nothing else relevant in the thread that he's "right" about.
2. The "we all know Canada harbors terrorists" line was bullshyt poisoning the well. This guy left India nearly 30 years ago in the 1990s, yet wasn't declared a terrorist by India until 2020, over a decade after the terror attack they're now claiming he masterminded. He's never been convicted of anything and India still hasn't shared what their information is that's making the basis of their claims. And there probably isn't a government in the world right now who has falsely accused more of its political enemies of terrorism than Modi's government.
Look how differently these outlets report on it:
Who was Canadian Sikh leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar?
Hardeep Singh Nijjar's fatal shooting in June placed him at the center of a rift between India and Canada.
www.google.com
Who Was the Man Whose Killing Canada Says India Instigated?
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada accused Indian agents of involvement in the killing of a Sikh separatist in British Columbia. Who was he?
www.nytimes.com
3. All that bytching "we shouldn't accuse our allies of doing bad things even if it's true!" shyt was pathetic. And that's the main thing that triggered me to respond. This isn't just about this incident - he's basically suggesting that the Modi government should get a huge pass from the West for America's own strategic reasons, so who cares who they kill?
And isn't this the same guy who insisted for years that Mueller was gonna nail everyone and they were all going to jail? I bet you posted the shyt out of him. He had so many wrong wrong takes even apart from being a right-winger at heart.