Can you cheat on someone and still love them?
- Thread starter yardman
- Start date
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
whaaat
that same old will kill your libido
using the coolidge effect to my advantage
hit one clean up hit the next clean up repeat till i feel right dipdipdip
*
BlackManLiveFromLondon
New God
And everytime threads like these are made its the same guys who come around talkin 'monogamy aint natural bla bla bla'
Keep trying to live like your ancestors did and see how far it gets you. Same place that struggles with women is talking about polygamy.. nikkas need to worry about getting one girl before you start talking about multiple
, talkin about polygamy but you aint even got the paper for one girl
Evolving happens. Monogamy came about because Polygamy on a wide scale simply isn't sustainable. If we wanna talk about our ancestors then a lot of us wouldn't even be here if our past relatives didn't start to practice monogamy.. a lot of you would be dead if we still tried to play by those rules because back then it was just like how male lions do it today, they run up on a lioness and kill any rival offspring
Its a reason them motherfukkers are the past
If you're not a millionaire bare minimum then what the fukk are you claiming Polygamy for? You're gonna be the first to suffer if that ever became the norm
Keep trying to live like your ancestors did and see how far it gets you. Same place that struggles with women is talking about polygamy.. nikkas need to worry about getting one girl before you start talking about multiple
, talkin about polygamy but you aint even got the paper for one girl Evolving happens. Monogamy came about because Polygamy on a wide scale simply isn't sustainable. If we wanna talk about our ancestors then a lot of us wouldn't even be here if our past relatives didn't start to practice monogamy.. a lot of you would be dead if we still tried to play by those rules because back then it was just like how male lions do it today, they run up on a lioness and kill any rival offspring
Its a reason them motherfukkers are the past
If you're not a millionaire bare minimum then what the fukk are you claiming Polygamy for? You're gonna be the first to suffer if that ever became the norm
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Send it to the friggin moon idiot
breh youre pissing in the wind....you want to better the world? better yourself...then teach your children....
are you seriously here on the coli talking about character and integrity?
have you read this thread?
I'm saying what the fukk I wanna say.
I don't need your lessons.
Hop off my dikk bytch nikka
StickStickly
Superstar
you're ignoring what i said and revising history to fit what you think happened because of biological urges. just because men are designed that way doesn't mean the social norm was that you average man (like you and the rest of the men here) were sleeping with everyone on a whim. why do you assume that biological need equates to what happened on a daily basis? men in primitive cultures and non western cultures weren't out there having sex with everything in sight. please point out a culture where NORMAL men did that? The FEW men on top had that privilege whereas the average man did not. and then you go and say only a few warriors impregnated multiple women. EXACTLY. You just proved my point. Most men weren't out there fukking everything.
Modern society is the only time where people have normalized sex with multiple people as a common activity, so normal people like you can act on your biological urges without consequence (social or biological).
i never said we are the same, I said women have sex with other men all the time. Does every woman you have sex with fall in love with you? No?Could it be because they only wanted sex? Why are you guys so angry over that? What would that mean for you if you accepted that?[/QUOTE]
Hacksaw Jim Thuggin
Superstar
breh....
anybody who takes the time to actually think up and type out cuss words is not worth trying to help anyway...youre already lost....
StickStickly
Superstar
EXACTLY. I agree. if you want to have many sex partners do it. But don't try to cherry pick science and history to tell me your partner needs to be loyal to you because as a man it's your biological imperative and not hers. So illogical.
Hard Times Nakamura
Banned
Yes. This is why nikkas can never get a "clean break" from his baby momma on average.
Hard Times Nakamura
Banned
A female almost NEVER has sex just for the joy of sex they are doing it to accomplish something or gain something from a Man.
Men don't need anything from a Woman they don't consider to be long term material except p*ssy. We are not trying to gain anything else out of side chicks and every time it becomes something more it's always at the Woman's urge half the time.
Side chicks have been fukking up the game since Biblical times if they all knew their place, followed directions and remained obedient America would not be having half the problems it has right now.
Men don't need anything from a Woman they don't consider to be long term material except p*ssy. We are not trying to gain anything else out of side chicks and every time it becomes something more it's always at the Woman's urge half the time.
Side chicks have been fukking up the game since Biblical times if they all knew their place, followed directions and remained obedient America would not be having half the problems it has right now.
whats that
?
010101
C L O N E*0690//////
do ya googles b*whats that
StickStickly
Superstar
where did you get this? that's not what happened during the renaissance. you have a very simplistic literal interpretation of words and concepts. it doesn't sound like you know anything about these periods ( i.e. the "romantic" period does not mean "romantic love" and has nothing to do with mating or monogamy/hypergamy. the renaissance saw a renewal of appreciation for the classical period (greece and rome).
You mean "oxytocin"? An increase in positive brain chemicals when you experience a lover or an activity you enjoy isn't bad, it's normal. Where did you read that they regarded it as a sickness? They didn't base relationships off love in the Renaissance period. They formed monogamous pairings for property and wealth distribution. If anything, those people paired more for "compatibility" reasons than modern people.
You seem hostile to the concept of love. If the feelings of love occur naturally in the form of a surge of brain chemicals albeit brief, what's the problem? Why call it ugly? The fact that it happens is part of our biological nature. " Love" doesn't exist because of capitalism. Love exists because it serves an evolutionary purpose.
So tying your argument to the OP's question, it seems like you don't think men can love their partners or their mistresses because love is not real or necessary. Your argument is that no, cheating men don't love their longterm partners (because they don't feel love in the modern sense), but they can feel committed to them. Is that correct?
How comes you can hate more than one person but you can't love more than one person?
despite what some may say, hate/love are not yin/yang in society
however, you can platonically love as many people as you would like and a very small few are capable of romantically loving more than one person.
Same nikkas that will ball up and tear like a bytch if they girl stepped out on them....if they were capable of getting a girl
*myopic strategy