Can you cheat on someone and still love them?

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

Yeah but you can kill yourself. It'd make your druggie whore momma so much happier if you just drunk a bottle of bleach

US Army personnel can't use recreational drugs, Drajaynay

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

Your mom should have finished the fukking abortion instead of trying to drown you in hard liquor and cigs. Your p*ssy pops passed down his p*ssy emotional ovaries into you, crybaby.

Catholics don't abort, Drajaynay.
You have white jokes like you grew up with white boys.

 

[Alfred0Santana]

I am an amazing woman and I love my bf. He is what I want sexually sometimes. He has an ok sized peen (7 inches) but my side male's dcks are usually around the same size or bigger with better girth. His stroke is ok, but I like variety. Plust my bf is under 6ft, so there is a lot of attraction missing. My side guys are usually taller, so they usually look better than me and I am usually more arosed by them. I still love my bf though and never left him.

To be honest. If my bf was over 6ft + like I like them, then I probably wouldn't cheat on him so much. I love him because he loves me and pays for everything, I'm spoiled. If he ever went broke, I'd probably leave him. If he was taller (and less clueless), he'd be perfect and he could have me all to himself like he thinks he does.


Sarcastic? This is what is wrong with you guys. This is how I've been getting away with cheating on my bf for so long and with so many men. You all never believe that things like this could happen. You all are so into this idea that "women would/could never do this or that" so you miss all of the red flags. This benefits me though, so I'm kinda glad you all do it. Been cheating for 5+ years now and never got caught. I don't love those guys, only my bf. We're still together and so in love and it's all thanks to me cheating on him. I probably would've left if I hadn't.

At least you honest . I ain't mad at it.

5+ years though. He gone turn into a savage if he ever find out.

 

[Cryptocurrency Scarface]

I am an amazing woman and I love my bf. He is what I want sexually sometimes. He has an ok sized peen (7 inches) but my side male's dcks are usually around the same size or bigger with better girth. His stroke is ok, but I like variety. Plust my bf is under 6ft, so there is a lot of attraction missing. My side guys are usually taller, so they usually look better than me and I am usually more arosed by them. I still love my bf though and never left him.

To be honest. If my bf was over 6ft + like I like them, then I probably wouldn't cheat on him so much. I love him because he loves me and pays for everything, I'm spoiled. If he ever went broke, I'd probably leave him. If he was taller (and less clueless), he'd be perfect and he could have me all to himself like he thinks he does.


Sarcastic? This is what is wrong with you guys. This is how I've been getting away with cheating on my bf for so long and with so many men. You all never believe that things like this could happen. You all are so into this idea that "women would/could never do this or that" so you miss all of the red flags. This benefits me though, so I'm kinda glad you all do it. Been cheating for 5+ years now and never got caught. I don't love those guys, only my bf. We're still together and so in love and it's all thanks to me cheating on him. I probably would've left if I hadn't.

I thought you were a Virgin so you're a bonefied thot

 

[SleezyBigSlim]

Male love is not monogamous.

Stop being brainwashed by Euro CAC 18th Century Romanticism

Question. Would you allow your baby mama to fornicate with other men? Monogamy ain't natural until it involves girl/baby mama I bet

 

[Ghost Utmost]

That feeling inside. The butterflies. Enjoying them. We call that 'love'. Unpack a phrase like "love at first sight". Impossible. The only thing that can arise at first sight is physical attraction. 90% of romantic love is just physical attraction. That's why it wears off after a few years.

If someone actually loves me, the foundation of that is them taking care of me. I'm speaking from my point of view as the subject of their love. I would call it bullshyt if it included anything that wasn't in my best interest.

Your warm feeling inside doesn't mean shyt to the other person. Your love is only worth something if it feels like love to your loved one.

So lying and betrayal don't qualify as love. Just mathematically.

Please expound on the last two paragraphs. Thanks in advance.

Let's say you're a psycho.

You tie them up in a basement and beat them 2x per week. Inside you may feel this overwhelming feeling of "love" but your "love" feels like torture.

The person on the receiving end of your [actions] is the real judge of whether it's "love" or not.

"Love" in this case is a verb. It's activity. So exposing your partner to disease and crazy people is not caring for another person.

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

Question. Would you allow your baby mama to fornicate with other men? Monogamy ain't natural until it involves girl/baby mama I bet

My first child's mom can have sex with whoever she'd like.
I don't live there.

 

[SleezyBigSlim]

My first child's mom can have sex with whoever she'd like.
I don't live there.

But not your current girl huh?

 

[Indiglow Meta (R$G)]

But not your current girl huh?

We live together, that would be odd.
I don't fukk other people, tho...

 

[Hard Times Nakamura]

Breh this is the average American chick you better pick your jaw up and realize the average American female more foul than we can ever be.

dikk size is arbitrary she is simply chemically incompatible with Main negro #1. Modern day Women have a very poor discernment sometimes with separating idealized physical attributes and the chemical profile of Men that attract them.

No Man would have a dikk below 12 inches if dikk size were the only selection factor. She is trying to get shock value half-trolling but can't even see the holes in her own argument.

so how does one prove their man only cheated for sex? men cheat for multiple reasons , a major one being resentment of the spouse. so how do women know for sure? also does the reason say the same over time? probably not. at first maybe it was a new woman's body then it becomes because the new woman likes certain activities and the wife does not or does not have the time etc. cheating is never one dimensional. men keep trying to fool women into thinking they're robots to everyone except one of them? come on.

also PLEASE STOP with that biology bs. according to infidelity facts.org, men and women desire to cheat as much as one another. women crave different men according to their ovulation cycle.

the only reason why people argue that they as an individual can cheat and another person cannot is because they know if the other person cheated their feelings will be hurt. but to trying to make women "bad" or "dumb" for having NATURAL emotions (that predate fukking disney movies) which men AGREE they would have themselves if their wives or main chicks cheat is transparent af.

Females from an evolutionary perspective DO NOT WANT EVERY dikk....

Meanwhile Men want EVERY WOMAN....Please try and remember grade school biology I know it's difficult. You should have paid closer attention.

There is a reason we have MILLIONS of sperm and you only have a few thousand eggs at most for LIFE

It is because Men need COMBAT sperm because they are not just soldiers sent to impregnate the Woman there are sperm SOLELY DESIGNED TO KILL OTHER COMPETING SPERM IN THE WOMB....

Why would we need this? BECAUSE MEN ARE DESIGNED TO IMPREGNATE AS MANY WOMEN AS POSSIBLE TO ESTABLISH DOMINANCE AND IMPROVE GENETIC FITNESS. STOP TRYING TO SAY WE ARE THE SAME....YOUR 100 YEAR OLD FEMINIST BS CAN'T TRUMP 100,000 YEARS OF RECENT HUMAN HISTORY.....THE MAJORITY OF MALES HAVE THE SAME DNA AS A HANDFUL OF WARRIOR CONQUERER nikkaS IMPREGNATING HUNDREDS OF WOMEN IN THE PRE-HISTORIC ERA!!!!

Question. Would you allow your baby mama to fornicate with other men? Monogamy ain't natural until it involves girl/baby mama I bet

Whether or not she has my child is irrelevant - Basically there are two types of Women and I agree with Esther Vilar's take on this. There was a whole body of work published on this globally in the 70's yall need to read up. Old heads been there done that already:

• Lolita
• Thothiana

There isn't much in-between. You marry Lolita and you fukk Thothiana for kicks but ultimately most Men don't have the skill and emotional maturity like in the old school to keep the two roles separated which is why "cheating" is such a big deal to the modern day Women - Because we don't do it or compartmentalize it as well as they do.

 

[StickStickly]

Male love is not monogamous.

Stop being brainwashed by Euro CAC 18th Century Romanticism

That's not what 18th century romanticism is breh lol.

I think you mean "romantic love". But still it occurred in history different than what you assume. Historically marriage everywhere was a contract to ensure bloodlines and the passage of wealth, property or trade. Romantic love was conceptualized among the aristocratic modern people (practiced by many MARRIED WOMEN) in the form of taking on lovers OUTSIDE the marriage. So basically romantic love wasn't the basis of long term relationships. Romantic love actually describes what you guys, as men who want multiple partners, want.

The concept of monogamy (one person commitment) for all people comes from religion. In the west, it's mainly Christianity because the New testament condemns adultery and promotes marriage and sexual acts between one man and one woman ONLY. So naturally if the west is Christian, monogamy gradually becomes expected and emotions evolve around that. It's like believing people have a right to live. People didn't always feel that way- there was no emotion attached to killing women, children, men. But introduce the concept that all people have a right to live and eventually society will develop strong negative emotions to the thought of war, slavery, etc. Take away religion and people don't feel as strongly as being married or staying with one person because there's no threat of eternal hellfire.

The concept of sleeping around openly has only been widely practiced (by your average broke people) recently with the loosening or releasing of religious ideals. Still, the world never operated as you guys assume with men running around filling their biological need with women outside their marriage as often as possible.

 

[iBrowse]

Yall done got @Ms.CuriousCat curious .

Be in a relationship brehettes

 

[iBrowse]

I am an amazing woman and I love my bf. He is what I want sexually sometimes. He has an ok sized peen (7 inches) but my side male's dcks are usually around the same size or bigger with better girth. His stroke is ok, but I like variety. Plust my bf is under 6ft, so there is a lot of attraction missing. My side guys are usually taller, so they usually look better than me and I am usually more arosed by them. I still love my bf though and never left him.

To be honest. If my bf was over 6ft + like I like them, then I probably wouldn't cheat on him so much. I love him because he loves me and pays for everything, I'm spoiled. If he ever went broke, I'd probably leave him. If he was taller (and less clueless), he'd be perfect and he could have me all to himself like he thinks he does.


Sarcastic? This is what is wrong with you guys. This is how I've been getting away with cheating on my bf for so long and with so many men. You all never believe that things like this could happen. You all are so into this idea that "women would/could never do this or that" so you miss all of the red flags. This benefits me though, so I'm kinda glad you all do it. Been cheating for 5+ years now and never got caught. I don't love those guys, only my bf. We're still together and so in love and it's all thanks to me cheating on him. I probably would've left if I hadn't.

 

[Hard Times Nakamura]

That's not what 18th century romanticism is breh lol.

I think you mean "romantic love". But still it occurred in history different than what you assume. Historically marriage everywhere was a contract to ensure bloodlines and the passage of wealth, property or trade. Romantic love was conceptualized among the aristocratic modern people (practiced by many MARRIED WOMEN) in the form of taking on lovers OUTSIDE the marriage. So basically romantic love wasn't the basis of long term relationships. Romantic love actually describes what you guys, as men who want multiple partners, want.

The concept of monogamy (one person commitment) for all people comes from religion. In the west, it's mainly Christianity because the New testament condemns adultery and promotes marriage and sexual acts between one man and one woman ONLY. So naturally if the west is Christian, monogamy gradually becomes expected and emotions evolve around that. It's like believing people have a right to live. People didn't always feel that way- there was no emotion attached to killing women, children, men. But introduce the concept that all people have a right to live and eventually society will develop strong negative emotions to the thought of war, slavery, etc. Take away religion and people don't feel as strongly as being married or staying with one person because there's no threat of eternal hellfire.

The concept of sleeping around openly has only been widely practiced (by your average broke people) recently with the loosening or releasing of religious ideals. Still, the world never operated as you guys assume with men running around filling their biological need with women outside their marriage as often as possible.

Look White males in the Renaissance who were creatively frustrated decided to try and ignore everything the Romans and Greeks already established almost a thousand years prior.

They decided to ultimately say that we are a more civilized society now and can have "higher" forms of love. What they didn't realize is the feelings they experienced were merely oxycontin, a feeling regarded as a "sickness" which is partly true. You have an abnormal level of hormone production in response to stimuli.

What they didn't know is once the stimuli changes or you become desensitized to it over time that chemical profile ends and you've "fallen out of love".

This is why I say look for COMPATIBILITY not for "LOVE"....

In the 1800's "Love" reared it's ugly head again and was used for a more business oriented purpose to sell goods and services to you for that "special someone".

 

[MaxPain]

Female love is not monog either.

I cheat on my bf all of the time, but I still love him.


I agree. I love my bf so much more after I started cheating on him. It was the best thing that ever happened to our relationship.



I agree. Just bc I like fcking and flirting with other men doesn'tmean that I love my bf any less.

& you're right. People can love 2 people at the same time. I love my bf and one of the guys I'm cheating with.


Women can too. I do it all of the time.


Yeah, I love my bf. He is a great person and funds my lifestyle. Sex is fine as well. I am commited to him, but sometimes I like to fck more urban males every now and then, other times I prefer guys who are more square. Depends on what mood I'm in that day. I still love my bf though.



It is just a nut to me as well when I do it. I don't have to like the guy, he just has to be tall brown and attractive. Money helps as well.

I do it and it doesn't weigh on my mind at all. I love my bf and don't feel guilty about cheating on him, at all.



Same for me when I cheat on my bf. Glad that you guys get my feelings about this so well. Most people don't.



Ok! I do it to my bf everyday as well. Still together and he is still in love with me. We are 5 years strong. He just bought us a house too. Next is marraige. He won.



Same. I don't care for any of the guys I cheat with. I only love my bf.



I am a woman and I am not hypergamous either. I am drawn to the physical and cash. I cheat on my bf, but always come back to him. That's true love



Romantic love and the love you have for your parents is not the same. Proof is that you don't fck your parents, and have no desire to do so. It is not the same.

Well whaetever works for u honey.

Most women aint like u (if ur telling the truth) but some very few can seperate sex from love. Theres even a whole lifestyle calles cuckolding where the woman has NSA sex with random dudes and the husband is okay with jt. She still loves her husband tho.


90% of females cannot pull this off without feelings involved. But if u can, then more power to u and ur relationship and I hope u best