I’d rather not have this conversation but I think that Divesting started in Slavery.
Unfortunately the way slavery worked in america was there wasn’t plantations with 300 slaves working 24/7. You had growing seasons and in the winter there was no crops to harvest. So like old school pimps said the cac would go down to the slave quarters and snatch up a woman and maybe send her back with a pork chop.
So they’d be told to request two pork chops.
After slavery a ton of Black women worked as maids and whatever happened happened so Black women got used to being used and abused by cacs and there’s a inherited stockholm syndrome with Black women.
Every Black person has been in a situation where they got shyttier service from a Black person than that same Black person gave to a cracker.
We can recognize the inner c00n of a Black person who acts like that but we don’t realize that Black woman with Divestor tendencies act basically the same.
Now, here is why I have an issue with this argument— you can’t bring up what happened to Black women in slavery/what may have shaped behavior without discussing the full picture. Black women were not alone in slavery. Black women were not strong enough to fight off white slave owners.
So when that white slave owner sent someone down to tell that Black women to make herself “available” to that white man, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO STOP IT FROM HAPPENING?
When Black women had to get work as maids, etc, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN’T HAVE TO WORK FOR THE WHITE FAMILIES? Or be our protection and be in the area/neighborhood if we had to go to work in those homes to help provide for our families?
If Black women “got used to being used by cacs”, as you say, it’s because no one stopped it and made sure that wasn’t the Black woman’s experience.
You do realize that 16, 18, 20, 22, 30+ yo black teens/women doing domestic work in these white homes…they didn’t want to be there.
I mean if “divesting” started in slavery then so did “pawging” because same way we have Black women who clearly have issues with brehs and they don’t know how to act, we ALSO have Black men who think brehettes are beneath white women, Asian women and Latinas and will let the whole world know.
____________________________
I say all that to say,
YES there are weird ass Black women who probably don’t look that great and have shytty personalities who have issues with Black men, and you’re fine to call them out.
But we don’t need to reach back in history and blame it on the experience of women who were ENSLAVED and unprotected from white men.
It can just simply be that these are women who weren’t socialized properly and are lame as fukk.
Same way you can put a man in the gym, put him in a new career and give him some interesting hobbies and all of a sudden

he getting women cuz he looks better, has money and has shyt to talk about, is the same way you can improve some key shyt with these women and make them the kind of women men actually want to be around.
Yes them chicks in the OP are weird for singling out a little 2YO Black boy.
Yes.
Weird as hell. Lame as hell. They are bitter for whatever reason and can be called out. Slavery doesn’t need to be cited.