:smugnolan:IMDB when Nolan fanboys were deliberately downvoting The Godfather with '1's" to boost The Dark Knight on the Top 100 list.
:smugnolan:IMDB when Nolan fanboys were deliberately downvoting The Godfather with '1's" to boost The Dark Knight on the Top 100 list.
It's the coli man, people are touchy.
Anyway the way it works is, the score is the number of critics who say something is fresh vs rotten. It's not an indicator of how many reviews give it a certain score. So for instance lets say all critics looked at Sorcerer and gave it a 7/10 score, which is a good score. They'd then go to rotten tomatoes, submit their review and whether the movie is fresh or rotten. If they all said its fresh with that score, the movie would have a 100% score, which some people take to mean all critics think the movie is perfect and worth that score of 100. When in reality, it just means 100% of critics say it's good and worth your time.
So when cats on here or other sites say "I didn't think it was worth a 95% score" they're taking it to mean critics scored the movie at a 95 as opposed to the truth which is 95% of critics surveyed said its a good movie.
The problem with the system though, besides its arbitrary nature, is that a lot of people don't actually read the reviews. They look at the score and keep moving. So they may miss a review that's fairly lukewarm on the movie even if the reviewer thinks its fresh. It takes the nuance out of film criticism and writing because we're just a dumb society in 2017 and want the easiest and quickest way possible to achieve our means
Isn't that pretty much the same way for IMDB ratings? Just pro critics with a smaller amount of reviewers.
It's a rounded percentage, right? Like if someone gives it a 7, another gives it an 8, another a 9, the movie would be around 75%-85%
So what's with the percentage factor? Like if 5 critics give it fresh and 5 give it rotten, it's 50%?Yeah that’s how IMDb works but not rotten tomatoes. Rotten tomatoes averages the number of critics who say fresh or rotten. It doesn’t take into account their score for the review. So if I have a 7/10 review and give it a fresh it doesn’t equate my 7 to a score. It doesn’t care what my number is. All it cares about is fresh or rotten
Oh look, another thread where someone doesn't understand how RT works.
That shyt continues to fascinate me
No none of this shyt is science. Not a single one of them. It's all about who you agree with. Either you agree with critics who (mostly) get paid for their work or fans who vote on IMDB you take your pick and you roll the dice.
Personally, I don't "trust" anyone's ratings because, as a film critic put it s bluntly recently, the person reviewing the film isn't me. They have their opinion, I have mine. And I'll be damned if I let someone else's opinion deter me from seeing something I really want to see. All of this shyt is opinion at the end of the day
All black movies on IMDb are rated low because they’re black movies
The only problem being brothas usually spoil like crazy in reviews.imdb's ratings were always trash. the message board discussions were a much better gauge.
imdb message boards don't exist anymore, no reason to visit the site now.
i go to youtube, type in a movie name, and search for black reviewers if i want an opinion anymore.