So the best hope then is to keep voting for moderate republicans with a (D) next to their name?
That's going to help us?
No, the best hope is educating your fellow man at the very least or becoming politically active and hoping that somehow people become more politically intuned and start to make the connections between government policies and their living conditions so they can form enough of a powerful bloc centered around a few basic tenets of social justice to offset corporate dollars...which is unlikely, but still an ideal to strive for.
Either that or this.
New age Reign of Terror? - ProjectCOVO.com Global Forum
Ballot box or bullet box.
But seriously, the "fukk Obama for not being a progressive" stuff I think is short-sighted and is an emotional personification of a what is really a structural critique of the political system and the flaws and shortcomings of civic society. It's inbounds--mandatory even--to criticize his presidency for its ineffectiveness in the most key areas, while at the same time it's foolish to do so in a vacuum without acknowledging the pre-existing conditions: the corrupt banking system, monetary system, trade policy, the state of campaign financing, the need for re-election and coffer filling for it, the broken political system, atrocious unprecedented abused arcane Senate rules, political obstructionism, the bloated national security apparatus and military-industrial complex, the effects of race, religion, and social mores on the electorate, the culture of distraction and short attention spans, disinterest and ignorance on behalf of voters (and non-voters), these fukking idiots who think returning to the economic policies of Eisenhower is a Bolshevik revolution, etc.
Again, America is America. We can only try to make it better. Not voting for the more progressive candidate because he wasn't progressive enough is foolish and counterintuitive as it sounds though...especially when you live in the largest swing state.