Where the hell you been the last 2 years.
she said her proposal would "directly benefit black children, black families, black homeowners" which would in turn benefit the whole country... and she also sponsored the bill in the op which has the specific language "african american". so what's the issue?
like i said, if you are in here applauding this bill (
it specifically says "Members shall be drawn from diverse backgrounds to represent the interests of communities of color throughout the state".... i take this to mean more than just black people), i don't see how you can have an issue with her when she has advocated the SAME EXACT THING (relating reparations for AAs as a benefit of the whole country/other communities of color)
i mean, unless you were just going off the title and not the actual wording and plain english meaning of the actual text of the bill
but doing that isn't going help you understand politics.