Brehs, would you try out living in a socialist utopia?

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,357
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
if yo lazy bum ass wanna contribute by flippin burgers , then flip burgers.. but you gone do something or you gone be in a camp breaking rocks and building statues lil nikka
Lmao imma be flippin the shyt out them burgers while you handle assassination attempts, military conflicts, and trying not to get beat in the next election, because according to you...

My burger flipping ass and your emipre leading ass are equals:youngsabo:

and stop telling nikkas they lyin, thats female shyt
:russ::russ::russ: fukk your feelings
 

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,357
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
:mjlol:Mmmmk sure

Now to vacancies. There were 18.4 millionvacant homes in the U.S. in Q4 '10 (11 percent of all housing units vacant all year round), which is actually an improvement of 427,000 from a year ago, but not for the reasons you'd think.

Nearly 11 Percent of US Houses Empty

3.5 Million Americans are Homeless. 18.6 Million Homes are Empty. WHAT's WRONG? - The Ring of Fire Network
:usure::usure::usure: breh that's just a house. A big, empty, standing structure.

I need furniture, electricity, food, water services, trash pickup, internet access, and an attached garage:usure:

You're part of "the people." Enrich my shyt:feedme::feedme::feedme:
 

MegaManX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,180
Reputation
6,322
Daps
16,390
I don't see how this prevents haves VS. have nots like the OP is suggesting.

This looks a modified version of the Socialistic Capitalism that the U.S. is built off of now...modified in that obviously more things are provided by the government and there is a artificial earnings cap but still...

In this example there are going to be business owners with hella throwaway money and burger flippers who wish their government-provided house was bigger, like their boss's house.

Unless the bosses get free housing too? Then god damn they must be caking hard af...either way it's not equal

socialism is not equality. Socialism is no slavery due to economic forces or unfortunate events.

Most people are poor in america because of debt, mostly for things they NEED. Education, housing, insurance, food, etc

In Norway, burger flippers are still the bottom of the barrel but unlike in america, they can have an apartment on their own income and enjoy life without worrying about the next mandatory payment about to rip them a new a$$hole.

You sound like the dude making 100k a year as a lawyer, but the firm gave everyone a minimum wage of 70k, so you quit the firm because you don't think the secretary should make 70k compared to your much higher 100k. You WANT HER to suffer so you can feel good even though it doesnt effect you in any other way other than seeing someone else happy too.
 

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,585
Daps
81,997
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
:mjlol:Mmmmk sure


:usure::usure::usure: breh that's just a house. A big, empty, standing structure.

I need furniture, electricity, food, water services, trash pickup, internet access, and an attached garage:usure:

You're part of "the people." Enrich my shyt:feedme::feedme::feedme:

You're not actually trying to learn anything. Pettie Bourgeois sure love talking in hypotheticals

Funny how you probably are okay with the fact we have more empty homes than we do homeless people and this is all just a put on.
 

MegaManX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,180
Reputation
6,322
Daps
16,390
Nah I'm using hyperbole to highlight the weaknesses in the OP's example and ideas.

Communism raises the floor for the average person, economically.

But by nature, it HAS to place a ceiling on the average person, because we're all pulling from the pot, so if one person pulls too much it breaks the system.

So you have two real issues here now. 1...you end up with China-style regulations on how many kids you can have and how much food you get, which leads to millions of little girls being strangled at birth because thier father wanted a boy (and later on, a crisis due to the lack of women)

2...you need someone to exist OUTSIDE the system to make sure nobody is pulling too much from the pot. Execpt this person is also pulling from the pot. Who is checking this person? Another person? What if they both agree to take a lil extra? Then a third person?? Nah too late the whole fukking government is corrupt because they have to exist outside of the very system they champion. Its inherently flawed. Period.

china's 1 child policy HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COMMUNISM lol. It dealt entirely with over-population. China is smaller than the US with 3x more population and less than half the livable lands due to huge mountain ranges all over the place.

That is like explaining fascism with burning of jews instead of a military dictatorship. One is a clear example. The other is one horrible act of humanity devoid of any logical path.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
If you not trying to fight for socialism/communism or a stateless society at the least and you claim to be pro-black you lowkey soft shoe c00ning @Turk

Hammer and Hoe - Wikipedia

tumblr_lh317kI6pv1qap9gno1_1280-764x1024_0.jpg




quote-call-it-democracy-or-call-it-democratic-socialism-but-there-must-be-a-better-distribution-martin-luther-king-112-87-29.jpg




quote-we-have-two-evils-to-fight-capitalism-and-racism-we-must-destroy-both-racism-and-capitalism-huey-newton-21-36-76.jpg


Black Anarchism: A Reader - Black Rose Anarchist Federation

black-anarchism.jpg




Capitalism is not gonna save nor will it uplift or better us as a people

quote-capitalism-is-a-development-by-refinement-from-feudalism-just-as-feudalism-is-development-kwame-nkrumah-68-68-64.jpg

get the fukk outta here.

The appeal to communism is black people scared to compete honestly.

We already face racism. Trying to trend-hop to economic systems is a way of trying to avoid dealing with white supremacy as if that changes anything.

Racism exists in communist societies. Heavily.
 

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,357
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
socialism is not equality. Socialism is no slavery due to economic forces or unfortunate events.

Most people are poor in america because of debt, mostly for things they NEED. Education, housing, insurance, food, etc

In Norway, burger flippers are still the bottom of the barrel but unlike in america, they can have an apartment on their own income and enjoy life without worrying about the next mandatory payment about to rip them a new a$$hole.
Better tell @Son of Sierra Leone ...that nikka owes me a mini-mansion:usure:

On a serious note that sounds cool, but again it leaves us with two big problems...

Govt. gives me an apartment. Cool. I have 3 kids. The apartment is too small. At that point I have to do for self. Period. I want a house so I have to move up in the world. One of two things has to happen. Either the govt. has to cover my ass again and hook me up with better housing, OR capitalism has to kick in and allow me to work more hours or get a promotion or SOMETHING, otherwise I'm being restricted by the Socialist Govt. That isn't right.

You sound like the dude making 100k a year as a lawyer, but the firm gave everyone a minimum wage of 70k, so you quit the firm because you don't think the secretary should make 70k compared to your much higher 100k. You WANT HER to suffer so you can feel good even though it doesnt effect you in any other way other than seeing someone else happy too.

Absolutely not. I want everybody at my job, in my family, in my friend circle, to eat like kings. I grew up syrup sandwich+pink milk for lunch poor so I want EVERYBODY to win...

Expect the people who don't want to get up off their lazy asses and put in work. They should starve. That includes people in the hood living off the government AND trust fund babies living off their luck.

It should be work put in+overall economic impact*replaceability = paycheck out.

Engineers keep the city with power, Allows all the businesses to make money. They deserve more pay than wack ass politicians who don't make any progress.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
So there being billionaires and millionaires while everyone else is scarping to get by means capitalism is a success

and how is not worrying about rent, bills/utilities, transportation, housing, medical expenses a bad thing

also, do you look at it as the government saving someone when Obama bailed out Wallstreet Bankers who crumbled the economy? or because they have the means that's ok
Define struggle. In your own terms.

Are you struggling?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
Black people should read the stories of blacks who traveled to communist countries during the Cold War.

Guess what.

STILL RACIST :laff:

You can run and hide from racism all you want, but it doesn't change anything endemic to many societies.


NYTIMES: Opinion | When the Harlem Renaissance Went to Communist Moscow

When the Harlem Renaissance Went to Communist Moscow

Jennifer Wilson

AUG. 21, 2017
21redcentury-wilson-superJumbo.jpg


Singer and actor Paul Robeson during his tour in Moscow in August 1958. Anatoliy Garanin/Sputnik, via Associated Press
In June 1932, the poet Langston Hughes arrived in Moscow as a part of group of 22 African-Americans who had been hired to act in a Soviet film about race relations and labor disputes in the American South. The cast had been assembled by Louise Thompson, an African-American activist who helped found the Harlem branch of the Friends of the Soviet Union, an initiative of the Communist International. Thompson saw in the film (which had the remarkably literal title “Black and White”) an opportunity to counter the distorted and stereotypical depictions of the African-American experience that plagued Hollywood films.

Hughes echoed Thompson’s frustrations with American cinema, explaining to a friend that he was putting his faith in the Soviets because “the American Negro stands very little chance of achieving true representation” in Hollywood. The 1929 Soviet production of “China Express,” a movie about a working-class revolt on a train traveling to Suchow from Nanking, inspired confidence in Hughes and Patterson that the Soviets could make quality pictures about people of color that didn’t reduce them to minstrels.

Moscow had not joined Paris and Berlin as havens for black American artists and writers seeking opportunities unimpeded by the color line. It had one advantage, however, over those other European capitals: In the Soviet Union, racial equality was not merely incidental but a state project. Vladimir Lenin, the founder of the Soviet state, saw in the development of a black proletarian consciousness the greatest potential for revolution in America. And at that point, consciousness-raising in Soviet Russia was still — before Joseph Stalin’s rise to power — a matter left to artists.

Perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that when the Soviets invited two representatives to speak on “the Negro question” years earlier (to mark the fifth anniversary of the Russian Revolution), one was a poet. The Jamaican-born Claude McKay had just published “Harlem Shadows,” a book of verses many considered the literary spark that had ignited the Harlem Renaissance. In Soviet Russia, McKay traveled to Red Army camps to read poetry from the volume, including his famous sonnet “If We Must Die.” McKay, though there as a political representative, devoted much of his speech, which he titled “Soviet Russia and the Negro,” to the role of the arts in racial progress. He talked about what he considered tired white expectations for black art, writing that Europeans were only familiar with “the Negro minstrel and vaudevillian, the boxer, the black mammy and butler of the cinematograph, the caricatures of the romances and the lynched savage who has violated a beautiful white girl.”

21redcentury-wilson2-superJumbo.jpg


Poet and author Langston Hughes of New York City speaks before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in Washington, D.C., in 1953. Associated Press
In Moscow, McKay spent evenings with poets, novelists, painters and figures from new avant-garde theater houses. With his Soviet colleagues, McKay wrote, “I was a poet, that was all, and their keen questions showed that they were much more interested in the technique of my poetry, my views on and my position regarding the modern literary movements than in the difference of my color.”

It was this promise of a creative solidarity unhindered by racial segregation that propelled Thompson, Hughes and the cast to invest their hopes in “Black and White.” When production the fell through, tempers flared. Some of the cast accused the Soviet Union of betraying the African-American cause to curry favor with Washington, from which the Soviet Union was hoping to receive official recognition. Hughes, perhaps the most seasoned artist of the group, attributed the failure to creative differences (too many people with opinions). Reflecting on the project years later, he wrote: “O, Movies. Temperaments. Artists. Ambitions. Scenarios. Directors, producers, advisers, actors, censors, changes, revisions, conferences. It’s a complicated art — the cinema. I’m glad I write poems.”

After the production of “Black and White” fell apart, many members of the cast stayed in the Soviet Union, believing it was their best place for their artistic careers. The actor Wayland Rudd was hired by one of Moscow’s experimental theater companies. The writer Loren Miller stayed to edit a Soviet anthology of African-American poetry. Lloyd Patterson, a recent college graduate who had signed on to the project merely looking for adventure, became a designer for film sets. His son Jimmy, still a baby, appeared in a famous 1936 Soviet film “Circus” in which a young white American woman with a black child flees the United States for racial sanctuary in Soviet Russia. Hughes stayed for several months in Soviet Central Asia, particularly Uzbekistan, reporting on Soviet reforms for various American publications, including the NAACP journal The Crisis. He was reportedly the first American poet whose work was translated into Uzbek.

Despite its demise, “Black and White” did not deter other black artists from taking a chance on the Soviet film industry. The singer and actor Paul Robeson arrived in Moscow in 1934 at the invitation of Sergei Eisenstein, the director behind such revolutionary classics as “Battleship Potemkin,” “October” and “Strike.” Inspired by the play “Black Majesty,” penned by C. L. R. James, an Afro-Trinidadian communist scholar and writer, Eisenstein had invited Robeson to potentially star in a film about the Haitian Revolution.

“I feel like a human being for the first time,” Robeson told reporters after he arrived in Russia. Of all the African-American artists and activists who traveled there, none developed as enduring a relationship with the Soviet Union as Robeson. Upon his arrival, he was received ecstatically by the Soviet theatrical establishment, which invited him to sing an aria onstage from Modest Mussorgsky’s opera “Boris Godunov.” Despite Soviet atheism, he was asked to sing Negro spirituals over the radio and at government parties. His song “Sometimes I Feel Like a Motherless Child” became newly emblematic of his relationship to his home country; the Soviets had put his recording of the song over an animated short film about racism and labor exploitation in the American sugar industry.

But by the time Robeson was beginning his great romance with the Soviet project, McKay and many African-Americans (including the novelist Richard Wright) were moving away from it. McKay, like many of the Russian artists he collaborated with in Moscow, would have a falling out with communism. The instigating event, for him, was Soviet Russia’s failure to cease trade with Italy even after Mussolini had invaded Ethiopia, then ruled by Haile Selassie. The invasion was widely seen as an affront to the very idea of black sovereignty. McKay would turn his political disillusionment into “Amiable With Big Teeth: A Novel of the Love Affair Between the Communists and the Poor Black Sheep of Harlem.”

Wright would soon join McKay in his disillusionment. In 1944 he wrote an article for The Atlantic Monthly called “I Tried to Be a Communist.” Frustrated by the American Communist Party’s tepid response to his novel “Native Son,” Wright wrote to a friend that the party “encourage the creation of types of writing that can be used for agitprop purposes,” but had “a tendency to sneer at more creative attempts.”

Hughes’s overt involvement in communism also waned by this time, but perhaps more out of necessity. He was under intense scrutiny from the McCarthyite House Un-American Activities Committee, which accused him of being at one time or another part of 91 communist organizations. Hughes, though, like Wright, did sense that too close an affiliation with a political organization or ideology could prove to be artistically stifling. Explaining to a friend why he never officially joined the Communist Party, he said, “It was based on strict discipline and the acceptance of directives that I, as a writer, did not wish to accept.”

Robeson was one of the last black “sojourners” to see in the Soviet Union an alternative to the racist and exploitative culture of the West. Between the Nonaligned Movement and a resurgence of black nationalism, the brand of communism bred from the Global South seemed to many by the 1960s and ‘70s to be a sharper weapon against racism and colonialism. As the black feminist writer Audre Lorde wrote when she reflected on her 1976 trip to Moscow, “Russia became a mythic representation of that socialism which does not yet exist anywhere I have been.”

Russia has long served as a repository for different kinds of mythology, from the Third Rome to the Red Scare. The myth of Russia as a racial paradise was perhaps one of its best, both as a muse to black artists across the diaspora and as a strategic tool in the African-American fight for political recognition. But as an early adherent, Hughes implied that the Soviet Union was just part of a larger narrative of black creative and political revolution; as the refrain of his 1938 poem “Ballad of Lenin” reads:

Comrade Lenin of Russia,

High in a marble tomb,

Move over, Comrade Lenin,

And give me room.

Correction: August 21, 2017
An earlier version of this article referred imprecisely to the House Un-American Activities Committee. It was a committee in the House of Representatives and a model for Senator Joseph McCarthy’s investigations into Communists in the government; it was not Senator McCarthy’s committee.
 

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,585
Daps
81,997
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
get the fukk outta here.

The appeal to communism is black people scared to compete honestly.

We already face racism. Trying to trend-hop to economic systems is a way of trying to avoid dealing with white supremacy as if that changes anything.

Racism exists in communist societies. Heavily.

The bougie always use this line for a reason family. Compete for scraps and barely get by while they continue to use their means to exploit

anyone serious about alternatives to capitalism realizes that racism would not disapear overnight.

https://extranewsfeed.com/white-sup...headed-dragon-that-must-be-slain-dc55fc5e8ccf


White Supremacy and Capitalism: The Two-Headed Dragon that Must Be Slain

Four decades of neoliberal Reaganomics has decimated the American poor and working class. Median wages have remained stagnant since the late 1970s, despite a consistent increase in productivity. The top 1 percent owns 40 percent of the country’s wealth, and top CEOs make more than 300 times that of the average worker (which is a 1,000 percent increase since 1978). There are 46 million Americans officially living in poverty, but, due to the arbitrary nature of the poverty line, another 100 million are “near poor” (i.e. cannot afford basic necessities). And keep in mind — this is happening in the richest country in the world. These third-world levels of economic inequality make the US look a lot like an oligarchy. The vast majority of new income goes to the top 1 percent, and one family — the Waltons of the Walmart empire — has more wealth than the bottom 40 percent of the population.

Wealth concentration and poverty under neoliberalism aren’t abstract concepts; they have tangible consequenses. For example, half of all Americans don’t even live paycheck to paycheck, student loan debt is diminishing the prospects of home ownership, climate change is on track to devastating poor communities while helping the rich, and 45,000 people die every year due to lack of health insurance. In Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s final speech to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1967, he said:

“One day we must ask the question, ‘Why are there forty million poor people in America?’ When you ask that question, you begin to question the capitalistic economy.”
But this is a democracy, right? Who would vote for such a grim existence? Well, according to an academic study from Cambridge, there is literally no correlation between public opinion and government policy. Turns out the plutocrats are running the show (thanks, in part, to Citizens United).


I would contend that generic capitalism should not be separated from advanced (think disease), hyper-consumerist, job-shipping, union-busting, soul-crushing neoliberalism. Prominent capitalists have fought desperately to achieve this sadistic system, which is the culmination of an evolutionary history of laissez-faire. One day, long ago, Adam Smith planted roses, and all that remain are the thorns. To quote King again, “today capitalism has out-lived its usefulness.”

But capitalism is not an equal-opportunity destroyer. These social tragedies demonstrably and empirically affect folks of color at vastly disproportional rates. For instance, the average net worth of black households is $6,314, compared to $110,500 for the average white household. Blacks are more than twice as likely as whites to be poor, and a white male with a criminal record is more likely to get a job than an equally qualified person of color with a clean record. Median black household income is approximately $43,300, while median white household income is around $71,300. This discrepancy is roughly 40 percent greater today than it was in 1967. And these economic disparities are just the beginning. For instance, in the area of mass incarceration, more than 40 percent of US inmates are black men, while that demographic only makes up 6.5 percent of the general population. In the area of police violence, black teens age 15–19 are 21 times more likely to be shot and killed by the police than white teens of the same age group. These statistics could continue for pages. Profound systemic racism poisons every aspect of American society. These horrors are manifestations of the racial caste system that has always existed in the US, which is discussed at length by Michelle Alexander in her groundbreaking book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.

We often forget that merely five decades ago, our country maintained a government-sactioned apartheid system. This included the intentional creation of black ghettos through redlining and other discriminatory policies. Political inertia, mixed with the racist War on Drugs, has preserved the vestiges of white supremacy. The reality on the ground looks a lot like the same ol’ Jim Crow; that guy we swore we kicked out in 1964.
 

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,357
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
china's 1 child policy HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH COMMUNISM lol. It dealt entirely with over-population. China is smaller than the US with 3x more population and less than half the livable lands due to huge mountain ranges all over the place.

That is like explaining fascism with burning of jews instead of a military dictatorship. One is a clear example. The other is one horrible act of humanity devoid of any logical path.
You contradicted yourself.

You yourself said that China is short on.....what? RESOURCES?

The basis of Communism is the sharing of...what?
RESOURCES.

That means when the GOVT ain't got no (say it with me now) RESOURCES...

NOBODY has any...RESOURCES!

So when the Govt decides how we should share the...RESOURCES...

Who loses? Not the gotdamn Govt...the PEOPLE DO!

In a Captialistic country, you could have as many kids as you can afford to feed. Period. If your kids starve...oh well, that's on you.

In the US, welfare programs prevent (some) kids from starving. That's a socialist concept applied to a capitalistic society.

If the Chinese govt wasn't expected to feed ALL the kids (which they are...because Communism) then they wouldn't give two shyts about how hungry your kids are or how 23 of yall live in a 3 bedroom apartment.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,262
Daps
616,313
Reppin
The Deep State
The bougie always use this line for a reason family. Compete for scraps and barely get by while they continue to use their means to exploit

anyone serious about alternatives to capitalism realizes that racism would not disapear overnight.

https://extranewsfeed.com/white-sup...headed-dragon-that-must-be-slain-dc55fc5e8ccf


White Supremacy and Capitalism: The Two-Headed Dragon that Must Be Slain

Four decades of neoliberal Reaganomics has decimated the American poor and working class. Median wages have remained stagnant since the late 1970s, despite a consistent increase in productivity. The top 1 percent owns 40 percent of the country’s wealth, and top CEOs make more than 300 times that of the average worker (which is a 1,000 percent increase since 1978). There are 46 million Americans officially living in poverty, but, due to the arbitrary nature of the poverty line, another 100 million are “near poor” (i.e. cannot afford basic necessities). And keep in mind — this is happening in the richest country in the world. These third-world levels of economic inequality make the US look a lot like an oligarchy. The vast majority of new income goes to the top 1 percent, and one family — the Waltons of the Walmart empire — has more wealth than the bottom 40 percent of the population.

Wealth concentration and poverty under neoliberalism aren’t abstract concepts; they have tangible consequenses. For example, half of all Americans don’t even live paycheck to paycheck, student loan debt is diminishing the prospects of home ownership, climate change is on track to devastating poor communities while helping the rich, and 45,000 people die every year due to lack of health insurance. In Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s final speech to the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in 1967, he said:

“One day we must ask the question, ‘Why are there forty million poor people in America?’ When you ask that question, you begin to question the capitalistic economy.”
But this is a democracy, right? Who would vote for such a grim existence? Well, according to an academic study from Cambridge, there is literally no correlation between public opinion and government policy. Turns out the plutocrats are running the show (thanks, in part, to Citizens United).


I would contend that generic capitalism should not be separated from advanced (think disease), hyper-consumerist, job-shipping, union-busting, soul-crushing neoliberalism. Prominent capitalists have fought desperately to achieve this sadistic system, which is the culmination of an evolutionary history of laissez-faire. One day, long ago, Adam Smith planted roses, and all that remain are the thorns. To quote King again, “today capitalism has out-lived its usefulness.”

But capitalism is not an equal-opportunity destroyer. These social tragedies demonstrably and empirically affect folks of color at vastly disproportional rates. For instance, the average net worth of black households is $6,314, compared to $110,500 for the average white household. Blacks are more than twice as likely as whites to be poor, and a white male with a criminal record is more likely to get a job than an equally qualified person of color with a clean record. Median black household income is approximately $43,300, while median white household income is around $71,300. This discrepancy is roughly 40 percent greater today than it was in 1967. And these economic disparities are just the beginning. For instance, in the area of mass incarceration, more than 40 percent of US inmates are black men, while that demographic only makes up 6.5 percent of the general population. In the area of police violence, black teens age 15–19 are 21 times more likely to be shot and killed by the police than white teens of the same age group. These statistics could continue for pages. Profound systemic racism poisons every aspect of American society. These horrors are manifestations of the racial caste system that has always existed in the US, which is discussed at length by Michelle Alexander in her groundbreaking book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.

We often forget that merely five decades ago, our country maintained a government-sactioned apartheid system. This included the intentional creation of black ghettos through redlining and other discriminatory policies. Political inertia, mixed with the racist War on Drugs, has preserved the vestiges of white supremacy. The reality on the ground looks a lot like the same ol’ Jim Crow; that guy we swore we kicked out in 1964.
Blacks don't have a problem with capitalism. Thy have a problem with equality in society.

Socialist tendencies as in more government support? Fine.

Communism? No.

In a society without racism, you wouldn't have so many people trying to pursue a communist society to smooth out inherent inequality.
 

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,585
Daps
81,997
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
Blacks don't have a problem with capitalism. Thy have a problem with equality in society.

Socialist tendencies as in more government support? Fine.

Communism? No.

In a society without racism, you wouldn't have so many people trying to pursue a communist society to smooth out inherent inequality.

I didn't argue that "blacks" did.

But historically we have saw what a detriment it was to us as a people

d43c6acd3f1ccfad1729deab1dffd594.png
 

El Coupeacabra

Diamond Teeth Samurai
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
3,673
Reputation
1,525
Daps
21,357
Reppin
214/254/512/210/281
You're not actually trying to learn anything. Pettie Bourgeois sure love talking in hypotheticals

Funny how you probably are okay with the fact we have more empty homes than we do homeless people and this is all just a put on.
Lmao because there is ABSOLUTELY nothing you can teach me about Communist governments that we didn't already learn from the USSR imploding or China letting people strangle babies.

It does. Not. Work.

You can't cite ONE successful Communist state that you prefer to the U.S.

@Blacksands gave a good example using Norway but it doesn't absolve wage gaps. It doesn't prevent the gathering of wealth. It doesn't really solve any of the issues you say it will.

So teach me breh:feedme:

How we gone save the homeless with empty houses with no lights, water, or food in them:feedme:
 
Top