I didn't necessarily need a back story, but the plot was wild inconsistent. I didn't need it to clearly have a partisan backdrop, actually kinda like that because most people can't do the heavy-handed storytelling without being cringy if I'm being honest. I get it was a film about journalism with the second US Civil War being the backdrop, but I think interviews and things in the trenches and some exposition in the form of actual reporting might have made this movie more palatable. It was just random war shyt just happening. And then the ending...wtf...that young girl pissed me off like no one I've seen in a movie or TV show in quite some time. I don't give a fukk if she's precocious...she was just all around unlikeable. Make her the secondary antagonist if they were gonna do that...
I hate Kirsten Dunst in most shyt, but she seemed ultra believable as a war correspondent, and this could've been a major comeback project for her that kinda fell flat. Best things about the movie were Plemons and Nick Offerman; Plemons plays the subdued psychopath perfectly and Nick is just talented at everything he does; but they weren't really given enough to work with. Nick offering counterpoints to the War narrative, didn't even have to have partisan messaging could've made this a tier higher, because than you could've seen how the journalistic perspectives play into how the war is interpreted, which would've further hammered home this is a movie about journalism, not war.
I try to pretend that this is the sequel to Leave the World Behind so that I have some semblance of story.