exactly, it aint the old days, let them business owners fukk around and find out
I’m almost done trying to explain it. But if it’s coming from a place of sincere ignorance I also wanna help brehs out.Its frieghtening that you have to explain this.
People are leaving high school and dont even have rudimentary understanding of government civics?
What were these guys doing in school? Bullshytting that much? Not paying attentiong? Pissing around.
I mean thats scary, what you explained is a foundational legal concept I learned in public school in the 9th grade
No, I don't believe they should. Homosexuality is protected as an innate characteristic like race or sex. Your prolife/choice example is invalid, as was your Nazi example earlier.
The court is essentially saying that religious belief should take precedence over civil rights law.
If a Catholic can refuse to do something for gays, should a follower of Odinism or Hebrew Isrealitism be able to refuse to do something for black or white people respectively?
Where is the line drawn?
november '16 was the slippery slope breh. At this point we pretty much been in a free fall for a hot minute nowI don’t agree with the lifestyle but this is a slippery slope like a mfer and sets a really bad precedent
Then dont take PPP money, dont get tax breaks business, simple as that.
Its the simple principle of not giving my money away to people who could potentially discriminate against me down the line.
I dont give a fukk about forcing someone to service me for some ego construct.
Its the principle of you arent going to benefit from my money being a hateful sack of shyt
We sit in restaurants today with no problem. There was a time that was frowned upon. Some stuff did change even if all didn’t.
It's about to be 1965-1968 all over again
november '16 was the slippery slope breh. At this point we pretty much been in a free fall for a hit minute now
At some point a bill is going to be introduced to literally roll the calendar back to 1951. And if i can find some action im putting the whole fukkin farm on a 6-3 ruling.
Theres ya damn mark of the beast right there.
What’s the definition of a “religion” though? I mean, anyone can create a religion. For example someone can create a religion which it is against their beliefs to serve a member of the military, or someone of a certain skin tone…It would then be on you to prove you have religious grounds to do so.
You actually can in the court of law. It’s done all the time. Do you know how many weirdos have tried to set up tax exempt churches in the name of Star Wars, ectWhat’s the definition of a “religion” though? I mean, anyone can create a religion. For example someone can create a religion which it is against their beliefs to serve a member of the military, or someone of a certain skin tone…
And you can’t, due to separation of church and state, state that one religion is invalid while others are valid.
Yeah at this point any brehs who aint doing what they can to prepare for war are basically asleep at the wheel.If it comes it comes
Im prepared to put my foot up the ass of whoever comes me and mines way with the bs