Breaking: Services can be denied to Gays (Supreme Court ruling)

[The_Sheff]

WHY WOULD I WANT SERVICE
FROM SOMEONE WHO
WOULD REFUSE IT DUE
TO MY RACE?

THIS IS HOW WE WOUND UP
WHERE WE ARE 2DAY...

SOME CAC SAYS NAH
YOU CANT SPEND YOUR MONEY HERE
AND NEGROS SAID
"PLEASE TAKE MY MONEY
MR WHITE MAN"


​

Your kid needs emergency care, the only surgeon on duty says he doesnt want to operate on your kid because they are black.

You cool with that?

 

[Patrick Kane]

This should set off France style riots but AmeriKKKa so

 

[CreepyMcCreeperson]

Conservatives don’t realize this opens up the possibility of people refusing to serve them too.

 

[Patrick Kane]

Your kid needs emergency care, the only surgeon on duty says he doesnt want to operate on your kid because they are black.

You cool with that?

That’s what these nikkas not understanding. This won’t be used on just gay people, it’ll be mainly used to discriminate against black people. You can “hide” being gay to receive those services if need be. We can’t hide shyt

 

[Elim Garak]

Democrats have to fight to expand the court. There's no other way.

They don't really have the numbers because Manchin wouldn't entertain it and Sinema is basically a Republican also trying to pretend she's independent. They would in reality only have 48 votes at best and you need a simple majority for conformation.

 

[CHICAGO]

Like I said Chicago was in here all happy when Trump was going at black immigrants. His slogan from back then was HYON when Yrump was targeting black folks looking for a better life

ANYBODY DAPPING
THIS LYING ASS c00n
REPUBLICANS POSTS SHOULD
KILL THEMSELVES.

I SEE ALL 4 OF YOU bytch ASS nikkaS.

HE LITERALLY JUST
MAKES shyt UP.

​

WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

THEY STERILIZE BLACKS IN ISRAEL.

HYON DOESNT APPLY TO OTHER BLACKS
YOU DUMB ASS nikka.
​

HYON IS FOR NON BLACKS
NOT NON AA.

DONT SPREAD MISINFORMATION.
​

AS LONG AS AMERICA AND AFRICA IS GOOD, IM GOOD.

ALL THOSE OTHER CAC COUNTRIES CAN HYON.
​

 

[Dem313wayz]

Wow this is crazy

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

You still haven't explained the difference

There is a difference. Since corporations are people in the eyes of the 1A, any "creative expression" i.e. making a website, is covered as free speech as it constitutes endorsement. The court says that free speech, even free speech that results in discrimination against a protected class, is permissible because anti discrimination law onfringes on their free speech by forcing them to endorse something their religion forbids.

Serving food and selling products aren't creative expressions.

All that being said, I believe this case sets a dangerous precedent. As @MMS said, where does the line get drawn? Religious views can be twisted to allow discrimination based on almost anything.

 

[CHICAGO]

use our social media, blast them, boycott them, then compete against them

YOU MISSED THE POINT...

YOU CAN ONLY DO WHAT
YOURE SUGGESTING AFTER
THEY DENY DUE TO YOUR RACE.

THIS RULING WILL
CAUSE RACISTS TO EXPOSE
THEMSELVES AND GET CANCELLED.


​

 

[UnQuantized]

So much to say, first customary
Ruth Bade Ginsburg needs to be held accountable for the shyt she pulled not stepping down. Anticipating a Hilary victory and wanting the first female president to appoint someone for her to stepdown, irony is that what would have been an iconic feminist moment is actually now a catalyst in rolling back the clock and placing freedoms fought for under pressure.
CACs will revere Trump even more now. He did what he was supposed to do for his side, none of that bi-partisan when they go low, we go high shytPolitics is a battle, you scheme and fight for your side or you get nothing. Decades of one sided compromise from Democrat presidents in the name of winning the moral high ground.

It's not just fearmongering now, it's happening America is sliding back to Jim CrowThey are not playing, Biden's programme when he first got elected looked promising but he is a moderate at heart, he doesn't really want to shake the tree and really reform.

 

[CrimsonTider]

You don’t think that this shyt is going to sink Republicans in 2024. They don’t have the majority, but this is going to get the majority to vote against them

I don’t think there will ever be the votes to expand the courts

 

[The Prince of All Saiyans]

they brought y'all asses back to 2003

 

[Adeptus Astartes]

Conservatives don’t realize this opens up the possibility of people refusing to serve them too.

This has already happened. There was a case a few months ago where some religious political group was refused service at a restaurant with gay staff and cried about it.

 

[CBalla]

YOU MISSED THE POINT...

YOU CAN ONLY DO WHAT
YOURE SUGGESTING AFTER
THEY DENY DUE TO YOUR RACE.

THIS RULING WILL
CAUSE RACISTS TO EXPOSE
THEMSELVES AND GET CANCELLED.


​

nah i was agreeing with you on that breh

 

[RennisDeynolds]

Conservatives don’t realize this opens up the possibility of people refusing to serve them too.

Yes they Do. It allows them to perpetuate their persecuted victim mentality.

They've mastered the grift