Breaking: Services can be denied to Gays (Supreme Court ruling)

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,765
Reputation
13,401
Daps
295,220
Reppin
NULL
so is this ruling 'refusing service because they're gay', or is it letting a business opt out of participating in a gay wedding, specifically?

if you believe in the bible and christianity (i don't, at all), why would christians be forced to provide services for a gay wedding? it goes against their religion. its right in the bible
 

OperationNumbNutts

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
6,270
Reputation
560
Daps
17,678
I'm 50/50 on this. If I was gay, why would I want to spend my money to someone who refuses to serve me. I am concerned this ruling isn't go to stop here. For example, stories of pharmacist who refused to sell birth control because it didn't align with their religious beliefs years ago.
 

Loose

Retired Legend
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,733
Reputation
2,176
Daps
128,087
So much to say, first customary:dame:
Ruth Bade Ginsburg needs to be held accountable for the shyt she pulled not stepping down.:stopitslime: Anticipating a Hilary victory and wanting the first female president to appoint someone for her to stepdown, irony is that what would have been an iconic feminist moment is actually now a catalyst in rolling back the clock and placing freedoms fought for under pressure.
CACs will revere Trump even more now. He did what he was supposed to do for his side, none of that bi-partisan when they go low, we go high shyt:comeon:Politics is a battle, you scheme and fight for your side or you get nothing. Decades of one sided compromise from Democrat presidents in the name of winning the moral high ground.

It's not just fearmongering now, it's happening America is sliding back to Jim Crow:huhldup:They are not playing, Biden's programme when he first got elected looked promising but he is a moderate at heart, he doesn't really want to shake the tree and really reform.
Even with Ruth replacement still would have been 5-4, them stealing a seat on top of that is the issue. Not to mention trump.


What a woat Supreme court

Thought this was the student loan thread point still stands
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,032
Reputation
-13,964
Daps
129,967
Let’s see, I don’t think we’ve seen as committed a democratic voter roll out as we’re going to see in 2024.
That doesn’t mean ever democrat elected will back expanding the courts.

It’s just as unrealistic as abolishing capitalism and universal healthcare
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
43,889
Reputation
263
Daps
124,169
so is this ruling 'refusing service because they're gay', or is it letting a business opt out of participating in a gay wedding, specifically?

if you believe in the bible and christianity (i don't, at all), why would christians be forced to provide services for a gay wedding? it goes against their religion. its right in the bible


Because this can obviously slide down and impact Black folks you dumb racist cac.
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
24,698
Reputation
4,230
Daps
92,430
Reppin
New York City
That doesn’t mean ever democrat elected will back expanding the courts.

It’s just as unrealistic as abolishing capitalism and universal healthcare
Bro, we’ll see and no expanding the court isn’t nearly that drastic. It’s been done before.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
53,905
Reputation
11,520
Daps
366,392
Reppin
CHICAGO
Your kid needs emergency care, the only surgeon on duty says he doesnt want to operate on your kid because they are black.

You cool with that?

:dahell: I DEFINITELY
DONT WANT A RACIST ASS
DOCTOR WHO WOULD LET
MY KID DIE BECAUSE OF HIS RACE
TO TOUCH MY fukkING SON.

YOU THINK HE GONNA
SAVE YOUR CHILD?

THIS IS WHY SO MUCH
fukkED UP shyt HAPPENS
TO BLACKS AT HOSPITALS.

TURN ME THE fukk AWAY
INSTEAD OF SABOTAGING ME.
:devil:
:evil:
 

Wargames

One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
24,698
Reputation
4,230
Daps
92,430
Reppin
New York City
so is this ruling 'refusing service because they're gay', or is it letting a business opt out of participating in a gay wedding, specifically?

if you believe in the bible and christianity (i don't, at all), why would christians be forced to provide services for a gay wedding? it goes against their religion. its right in the bible
They could always weasel their way out of it.

This ruling allows them to put the equivalent of “No Gays Allowed” on signs and how long before one of them just says hey we think all blacks are gay and deny them service using homophobia as an excuse?
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,765
Reputation
13,401
Daps
295,220
Reppin
NULL
Because this can obviously slide down and impact Black folks you dumb racist cac.
They could always weasel their way out of it.

This ruling allows them to put the of “No Gays Allowed” on signs and how long before one of them just says hey we think all blacks are gay and deny them service using homophobia as an excuse?
but they didnt get refused service because they were gay. they got refused because making a website for a gay wedding is, in effect, working/participating in a gay wedding, which the bible is against

i dont see the connection
 

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
10,886
Reputation
2,538
Daps
66,575
Reppin
Imperium of Man

:dahell: I DEFINITELY
DONT WANT A RACIST ASS
DOCTOR WHO WOULD LET
MY KID DIE BECAUSE OF HIS RACE
TO TOUCH MY fukkING SON.

YOU THINK HE GONNA
SAVE YOUR CHILD?

THIS IS WHY SO MUCH
fukkED UP shyt HAPPENS
TO BLACKS AT HOSPITALS.

TURN ME THE fukk AWAY
INSTEAD OF SABOTAGING ME.
:devil:
:evil:

The real issue in this hypothetical is that if your kid dies en route to another hospital that would treat him, you would have no recourse to go after the hospital that refusined to serve him.
 
Top