BREAKING NEWS: NBA suspends 2019-2020 season

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,702
Daps
203,928
Reppin
the ether
The nba is a players league. The top 10% of players are already in a max contract situation currently. They aren’t worried about the max contract situation for this summer. There is no way to say how this play out for a salary cap 2 seasons for now.

If this happened last season, then I could possibly it.

I just don’t see Lebron James, Kwahi Leonard, Giannis, and Russell Westbrook moving to a different city for a few months to ensure the cap goes up slightly to help a bench player get a couple more thousand dollars in his contract next season.

You ain't know all the players could lose 1/4 of their salary from THIS year already if those games ain't played? And plenty players gonna be free agents real damn soon.
 

dora_da_destroyer

Master Baker
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,295
Reputation
16,212
Daps
268,049
Reppin
Oakland
I don’t mind the league trying to make contingency plans...in house. But they look stupid continuing to release statements to reporters. Now if people are leaking stuff, I guess but just stfu and release a plan when you can actually make a plan you can stick to
 

CarltonJunior

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
47,652
Reputation
5,635
Daps
132,244
Reppin
Duval County
They gotta just take this L like everybody else. They starting to look (more) desperate.

I agree, EVERYBODY is taking a hit, not just them. The chances of being able to start the season back up in a month like june/july and starting up the following season within this calendar year are low, and some states seem to be dead set on not bringing sports back at all this year which limits your venues.
 

inndaskKy

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
11,897
Reputation
2,705
Daps
42,779
Reppin
NULL


This was 5 days before the Jazz game, fans should not be allowed till vaccine


Not to trivialize their deaths or the possible risk of corona virus but this is yet another example of a biased article that assumes the worst and questions very little.

For context:

"In the coming days or weeks, all five men would die from health complications caused by the coronavirus. At least a dozen others who were there have tested positive or experienced symptoms consistent with the virus."

"But on that night of March 6, there were five people in the gym who later died after testing positive for coronavirus. There’s no way to know if they contracted it at Lawrence Central. "

"There is no way to pinpoint exactly when the virus spread. Loggan, 57, was only at Lawrence Central one night, for a little more than two hours. He worked around hundreds of people all day, every day. DeSalle, 70, attended a Lawrence Township youth basketball event the day of the sectional championship game. Rush, 67, was an Uber driver. Johnson, 78, went to the grocery store and church that weekend. Taylor, 43, was around kids and adults in his job as a cafeteria worker at Stonybrook Middle School."

I'll bet you anything they had pre-existing conditions but we can't know because the author doesn't report about it and as you can see four of them were 57+. I very much doubt it can have been clearly determined that they all died from corona virus instead of with. As the story mentions, one of the people who had been in close contact with one of the victims was diagnosed with the flu. The person who he came in contact with, 70 years old, fell ill a few days later (also consistent with the incubation period for the flu). He tested positive for corona but the article doesn't state whether they tested him for the flu.

Also, how many people do you think usually die within a few weeks after a major event with thousands in attendance during a flu season? It's important to ask just how many people of the 2800 have had corona because 5 out of 2800 is only 0.18% deaths. Obviously, most people likely did not have it but the article mentions at least a dozen other people who did have it but either only tested positive or "experienced symptoms". "Many others experienced symptoms consistent with coronavirus, but were not tested".
If only 500 out of the 2800 have had coronavirus (not an unreasonable number given the reported number of people with symptoms and as this was before serious lockdown measures) but the other 495 did not die, that would put the death rate at 1%. Similar to the flu.

Without looking into this kind of detail, this certainly is playing up the human element a whole lot while investigating the facts very little.
 
Top