BREAKING hezbullah was hit by another wave of exploding devices, as walkie-talkies used by the group blew up in homes, cars and in operatives' hands
- Thread starter Malcolmxxx_23
- Start date
both hilarious and disgusting offensive when Zionists act like Jews were not heavily involved in slavery and the Atlantic slave trade in the Caribbean. why do they insist on lying about that
Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight. By Eli Faber (New York and London: New York University Press, 1998. xvii plus 366pp.)
There are some audiences in North America today who find it difficult to understand past societies and their value systems, and who think a transgression in the past, however distant, invalidates activities or ideas of the present. For these people the finding that even one Jew participated in the slave trade in the 18th century invalidates Jewish political support of civil rights or integration in the 20th century. One outcome of this has been a re-invented history of the Jewish participation in the slave trade which asserts that Jews were the majority of slave owners in the United States and played a major role in the slave trade everywhere. It is in this context that Eli Faber wrote his scholarly book on the participation of Jews in the slave trade and slavery. He has provided the basic numbers that can be established on the relation between Jews and African slaves in the English and Dutch colonial worlds. His major finding is that Jews had a minuscule role in the slave trade and played only a minor role as slave owners wherever they resided in the New World. Of course, knowledgeable historians could have predicted the results of the book, given the circumscribed role of the Jews within European and American societies from the 15th through the 18th century. As Faber shows, the Jews were not a major factor in any international trade in the Anglo-Saxon world, except possibly the diamond trade. They were also not [End Page 743] significant as planters or slave owning farmers, except possibly in Surinam. To the extent that they owned slaves they tended to own fewer slaves on average than their non-Jewish peers. A dozen or so participated in some aspect of the Atlantic slave trade to 1800, with only about half a dozen being serious traders, and even this group moved a very tiny fraction of the total Africans brought to America. The largest group of Jewish slave traders in the British Empire, and the only ones who systematically engaged in the African trade over a long period were the three or four Rhode Island Jewish merchants who in total controlled less than 10% of the voyages and less than 10% of the slaves delivered by Rhode Island traders in the 18th century. In turn Rhode Island was one of the minor ports within the English world engaged in the slave trade. Practically no Jews within England engaged in the far larger trades coming from Liverpool, Bristol and London.
That it was necessary for a scholar to provide this much detail on this issue, tells us more about our own society than it does about the Jews and Africans in this period. Indeed one can understand much of the fascination with the Jewish role in the slave trade not as a matter of scholarly interest, but as part of an attack by anti-integrationist leaders on the Civil Rights movement and the “rainbow” coalition. By the principle of condemning the participation of any single member of a particular group participating in slavery or the slave trade, it would be possible to write histories attacking the role of Catholics, Protestants, Moslems, West Africans or Mozambicans, all of whom engaged in the Atlantic slave trade. Of course it might be impolitic to antagonize these groups. This tactic even seems to have found some resonance in some liberal circles in the United States, as seen by apologies given for this past Jewish participation, or even shock from those who had no idea that Jews had ever held slaves or owned slave ships.
As Professor Faber shows, the facts of limited Jewish participation in the trade and ownership of slaves have been known to historians for quite some time and has been dealt with at length by scholars. Where Faber has done all scholars a service is to gather all these specialized materials together and present them, along with his own research, in a coherent...
STOP REGURGITATING ANTI-SEMITIC TROPES PROPAGATED BY THE NOI VIA FUNDING OF THE RADICAL JIHADISTS & THE KKK
ReasonableMatic
................................
Apartheid in the Caribbean
In the Dominican Republic, policies toward Haitians and Dominicans of Haitian descent bear ominous parallels with Israel’s racist repression of the Palestinian people.
nacla.org
Israel and the Dominican Republic: A tale of two fences made vulnerable by arrogance
By Narciso Isa Conde Narciso Isa Conde is a Marxist political analyst, writer and political leader in the Dominican Republic, a veteran of the struggles against the Trujillo dictatorship and the U.S. invasion of the DR in 1965, who writes regularly on the class and liberation struggles. He publis
www.workers.org
Catch these stones of Truth, DEVIL
Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight. By Eli Faber (New York and London: New York University Press, 1998. xvii plus 366pp.)
There are some audiences in North America today who find it difficult to understand past societies and their value systems, and who think a transgression in the past, however distant, invalidates activities or ideas of the present. For these people the finding that even one Jew participated in the slave trade in the 18th century invalidates Jewish political support of civil rights or integration in the 20th century. One outcome of this has been a re-invented history of the Jewish participation in the slave trade which asserts that Jews were the majority of slave owners in the United States and played a major role in the slave trade everywhere. It is in this context that Eli Faber wrote his scholarly book on the participation of Jews in the slave trade and slavery. He has provided the basic numbers that can be established on the relation between Jews and African slaves in the English and Dutch colonial worlds. His major finding is that Jews had a minuscule role in the slave trade and played only a minor role as slave owners wherever they resided in the New World. Of course, knowledgeable historians could have predicted the results of the book, given the circumscribed role of the Jews within European and American societies from the 15th through the 18th century. As Faber shows, the Jews were not a major factor in any international trade in the Anglo-Saxon world, except possibly the diamond trade. They were also not [End Page 743] significant as planters or slave owning farmers, except possibly in Surinam. To the extent that they owned slaves they tended to own fewer slaves on average than their non-Jewish peers. A dozen or so participated in some aspect of the Atlantic slave trade to 1800, with only about half a dozen being serious traders, and even this group moved a very tiny fraction of the total Africans brought to America. The largest group of Jewish slave traders in the British Empire, and the only ones who systematically engaged in the African trade over a long period were the three or four Rhode Island Jewish merchants who in total controlled less than 10% of the voyages and less than 10% of the slaves delivered by Rhode Island traders in the 18th century. In turn Rhode Island was one of the minor ports within the English world engaged in the slave trade. Practically no Jews within England engaged in the far larger trades coming from Liverpool, Bristol and London.
That it was necessary for a scholar to provide this much detail on this issue, tells us more about our own society than it does about the Jews and Africans in this period. Indeed one can understand much of the fascination with the Jewish role in the slave trade not as a matter of scholarly interest, but as part of an attack by anti-integrationist leaders on the Civil Rights movement and the “rainbow” coalition. By the principle of condemning the participation of any single member of a particular group participating in slavery or the slave trade, it would be possible to write histories attacking the role of Catholics, Protestants, Moslems, West Africans or Mozambicans, all of whom engaged in the Atlantic slave trade. Of course it might be impolitic to antagonize these groups. This tactic even seems to have found some resonance in some liberal circles in the United States, as seen by apologies given for this past Jewish participation, or even shock from those who had no idea that Jews had ever held slaves or owned slave ships.
As Professor Faber shows, the facts of limited Jewish participation in the trade and ownership of slaves have been known to historians for quite some time and has been dealt with at length by scholars. Where Faber has done all scholars a service is to gather all these specialized materials together and present them, along with his own research, in a coherent...
STOP REGURGITATING ANTI-SEMITIC TROPES PROPAGATED BY THE NOI VIA FUNDING OF THE RADICAL JIHADISTS & THE KKK
I'm not going back with you because you a piece of zionist shyt.
I know my history and ive even been to some of the plantations your ancestors created
go deep throat a knife
I THINK ILL TAKE WASHINGTON POSTS WORD OVER YOUR “TRUST ME BRO!” SOURCEI'm not going back with you because you a piece of zionist shyt.
I know my history and ive even been to some of the plantations your ancestors created
go deep throat a knife
DO U BELIEVE JEWS HAVE A RIGHT TO THEIR OWN NATION?
Your Washington post opinion article literally supports the fact that y'all were slave traders and slave owners. and I don't give a shyt what you think buddy and I'm not going to educate someone like you
go live stream your death p*ssy
ARE U RETARDED? EVERYONE WHO WAS ALIVE DURING THAT TIME PARTOOK IN THE SLAVE TRADE… BUT JEWS WERE INVOLVED DISPROPORTIONATELY LESS COMPARED TO OTHERS INVOLVED… SO THE ANTI-SEMITIC TROPE ABOUT JEWS “CONTROLLING” THE SLAVE TRADE (WHICH WAS CREATED TO INCITE HATRED AGAINST JEWS) IS THE ISSUE HERE .. WHEN ALL U GOTA DO IS LOOK AT THE DATA TO UNDERSTAND THAT ITS A FLAT OUT LIE ..
ITS LIKE HOW JEWS WERE GETTING LYNCHED BY WHITE SUPREMACISTS BACK IN THE DAY.. BUT NOBODY GOES AROUND SAYING “JEWS WERE GETTING LYNCHED MORE THAN ANYONE! THEY WERE THE PRIMARY TARGETS OF LYNCHING!!” .. THATS WHEN IT WOULD BECOME A PROBLEM ROOTED IN AN AGENDA
AND U STILL FAILED TO ANSWER MY QUESTION..
DO U BELIEVE JEWS HAVE A RIGHT TO THEIR OWN NATION?
Those poor innocent terrorists 
Catch these stones of Truth, DEVIL
Spamming social media posts about different events makes the argument hard to follow, and calling him a "devil" reduces the validity and makes it look like you'd do the same if you were in that position. You can do better than that. Just hit him with the facts without the slurs.
Yo this is wild....do you really an opinion piece by a random low-level reporter is "The Washington Post's word"?
"David Mills is a reporter for the Washington Post Style section."
Either you're functionally illiterate and don't know what an "opinion piece" is, or you were blatantly lying when you said that was the position of the Washington Post. He may or may not be right, but just trying to claim the Post as an argument from authority is blatantly dishonest.
FACTS DONT WORK WHEN U DONT HAVE ANY
HIS WHOLE POINT IS TRYING TO PAINT JEWS AS AN EVIL GROUP OF PEOPLE
SO WHY ARE U EVEN TELLING HIM TO POSTS “FACTS” TO SUPPORT THAT?
Those poor innocent terrorists
This is the third or fourth time I've seen you trashposting in an Israel thread. I get that shytposting is your schtick here on this board, but maybe leave it to the unserious threads and stay out of the ones where you don't know shyt?
Yo this is wild....do you really an opinion piece by a random low-level reporter is "The Washington Post's word"?
"David Mills is a reporter for the Washington Post Style section."
Either you're functionally illiterate and don't know what an "opinion piece" is, or you were blatantly lying when you said that was the position of the Washington Post. He may or may not be right, but just trying to claim the Post as an argument from authority is blatantly dishonest.
WHO CARES ABOUT WHATS AN OPINION PIECES WHEN THERE IS LITERAL DATA THAT BACKS WHAT IM EXPLAINING HERE
I'll take the charges one at a time. The Dutch East India Company did not deal in the slave trade. As for the "Portuguese company" and the "Brazilian company," I can only assume Jeffries meant the Brazil Company, founded by Portugal to attract Jews. It too did not deal in slavery. Of the four, only the Dutch West India Company did in fact deal in the slave trade. Of the company's 3,000,000 florins in original capital, Jews contributed only 36,000, or 1.2 percent. In 1656, seven of 167 major shareholders were Jews; in 1671, ten of 192.
THIS IS DATA .. NOT “OPINION”
Jews and the Slave Trade: Just the Facts | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
To the Editors of The Crimson: Throughout Leonard Jeffries' speech last Wednesday, he reiterated a call to the audience: "Be
FIRST U ARGUING FOR HEZBOLLAH .. NOW U ARGUING FOR ANTI-SEMITIC BLOOD LIBEL THATS BEEN THOROUGHLY DEBUNKED
TELL US WHAT U REALLY BOUT