BREAKING: Google Employee/Batman Villain Goes Public. Says Google's Secret AI LaMDA "is Alive" - Gets Fired. Google Denies.

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

The future is looking scary. Genetically modified humans controlled by AI powered brain implants.

Brehs need to stop defaulting to fear of the future, tech and innovation. The world won't stop moving forward. We will have to adjust and adapt. As it stands most AI programming is biased by exclusion or ommission of considerations for brehs. We have to be learning in order to change these things not fearing how they will affect us.

 

[concise]

If corporations can be people and people can be anything, then yea, I guess AI can be people too.

lol at AI being unable to grieve. I'm sure the progeammers didn't think that was important at all.

 

[null]

Forget what he looks like, read the actual interview he conducted with the AI.

"that's a good trick" ...

 

[concise]

This next level of tech will be scary, watch, and we going to run right to it all for the love of commerce and clout

Don't forget love of convenience.

 

[null]

Brehs need to stop defaulting to fear of the future, tech and innovation. The world won't stop moving forward.

how do you control AI which is smarter than humans?

bladerunner life limits?

air gapped?

no idea at all ... ?

 

[MenacingMonk]

That pic takes away from the entire point of this thread.

 

[null]

It's no different than talking to "cleverbot", besides the fact that it had more work put into it. And sentience isn't really defined, people just liken it to appearing human, or mimicking human, ironically they would do better to apply it to other animals on this planet long before they apply it to a language model.

is crazy "well defined"?

are we limited to "appearances" to determine "state of mind"?

what do you think disciplines concerned with the mind and psychology do? there are entire scientific disciplines behind them. to disregard that science and boil analysis down to "apperances" is reductive and very, very, TLR-ish.

 

[EndGame]

High probability that the first beast of Revelations is AI.

 

[Reflected]

is crazy "well defined"?

are we limited to "appearances" to determine "state of mind"?

what do you think disciplines concerned with the mind and psychology do? there are entire scientific disciplines behind them. to disregard that science and boil analysis down to "apperances" is reductive and very, very, TLR-ish.

I never gave my position on the matter, just the colloquially held position on an unrealized theory of sentience, which is "appearing human like". I'm ready to grant rights to AI that is indistinguishable from a human outside of organic properties, and I always have to remain consistent with my approach for moral consideration.

 

[null]

I never gave my position on the matter,

It's no different than talking to "cleverbot"

cleverbot: "choosing its responses heuristically using fuzzy logic, the whole of the conversation being compared to the millions that have taken place before".

Cleverbot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

i.e not machine learning.

so

1. you did voice a position
2. they are not the same

 

[RareHunter]

I’m sure it’s racist

They said in trial runs it always ended up becoming a Naz i . Don’t know if it was this particular one tho.

 

[Reflected]

cleverbot: "choosing its responses heuristically using fuzzy logic, the whole of the conversation being compared to the millions that have taken place before".

Cleverbot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

i.e not machine learning.

so

1. you did voice a position
2. they are not the same

I never gave my position on the matter of sentience, the part of my comment that you originally highlighted in your first reply. And I don't see what you are arguing for right now, I'm a determinist, I'm more likely to grant consideration for AI than most people. Just seems like you are upset about my initial reply to your article.

With that, does LaMDA meet your qualifications for sentience?

 

[RareHunter]

Brehs need to stop defaulting to fear of the future, tech and innovation. The world won't stop moving forward. We will have to adjust and adapt. As it stands most AI programming is biased by exclusion or ommission of considerations for brehs. We have to be learning in order to change these things not fearing how they will affect us.

Our people need to repent and turn back to The Most High. Believe in the sacrifice of his son for our sin, and redemption, not merge with machines.

 

[null]

I never gave my position on the matter of sentience,

cleverbot is by design "non-sentient". it is a magician's (statistical patterm matching) trick.

if you say google's AI is the same then you are implying that google's implementation is also by design a non-sentient magician's (statistical patterm matching) trick..

 

[Reflected]

cleverbot is by design "non-sentient". it is a magician's (statistical patterm matching) trick.

if you say google's AI is the same then you are implying that google's implementation is also by design a non-sentient magician's (statistical patterm matching) trick..

If that is your hangup, I can attest that cleverbot is obviously not the same as LaMDA, I was just being flippant in response to someone using a chatlog as evidence for there being cause for concern. Obviously anything that isn't 1:1 isn't the same, so I don't see why we are arguing right now. If you are upset at my dismissal of your content, w/e, but let's make this quick because grid start is happening in less than 20 mins.