Actually the article was talking about overall playoff wins and he will eventually pass Montana and Bradshaw in that department...and if he wins a 4th SB he will tie them in that department....where did they say that he should be compared to those guys going 4-0 in SB? not really sure what's your beef here....
█ W.D.Y.D. █;2832544 said:This is pathetic, Pats fans have gone from celebrating SB wins, to playoff wins and SB appearances.
You always hear OMG 5 SB appearances in 10 years for Brady. Not once have I ever heard anyone pump up Jim Kelly for making 4 SBs in 8 years.
Lets be real, Brady hasn't won since spygate and having an allstar defense to carry him. fukk Brady Texans got this
So if NE would have won just 1 of the 2 SBs since spygate, let's say by a field goal, like the previous wins, then Brady would be deserving of more praise?
Of course, I don't think he can do it without the "extra film" or without that allstar defense he had. Those years that he won, the defense was the heart and soul of the team. Now it is the offense and he can't seem to get it done. The last 2 superbowls, the pats were the favorite but he couldn't it done
LOL.. the SB wins were just as close as the losses. Literally the difference was one play here or there. I guess all that "extra film" is what helped Carolina kick the ball out of bounds giving Vinatieri the opportunity to kick the game winner. Got it.
LOL.. the SB wins were just as close as the losses. Literally the difference was one play here or there. I guess all that "extra film" is what helped Carolina kick the ball out of bounds giving Vinatieri the opportunity to kick the game winner. Got it.
No extra game film is what helped the Pats stay in the game
How dense are you? Were they not "in the game" before Tyree's and Manningham's catches?
How dense are you not to realize I was speaking about your comments regarding the Carolina game.
Again they were favored in both games but couldn't get it done, I wonder why since the Pats had the better team