Boiler Room: The Official Stock Market Discussion

chineebai

Superstar
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
11,433
Reputation
1,071
Daps
31,961
Reppin
NULL


If the losers can't cover the brokerages have to step in. The smaller brokerages fail. Then the clearing houses have to take over. They get the funds from other larger brokerages who in turn fail and the whole system collapses on itself. These brokerages run to the banks and tap credit and can't pay it back then it hits the banks.

Robinhood stepped in and took the bullet to prevent a full scale financial collapse. These fools on WSB are trying to engineer a complete financial meltdown under the guise of let's get the share price to $1000.

We came right to the edge of everything blowing up. Lord knows how many people would have suffered if it happened.

Congress needs to act to prevent this from ever happening again.

Market is what 50 trillion, this is a speck on the wall. fukk these short sellers and hedge funds gaming the system and being greedy.
 

Payday23

Superstar
Joined
Nov 20, 2014
Messages
14,978
Reputation
1,551
Daps
55,952


If the losers can't cover the brokerages have to step in. The smaller brokerages fail. Then the clearing houses have to take over. They get the funds from other larger brokerages who in turn fail and the whole system collapses on itself. These brokerages run to the banks and tap credit and can't pay it back then it hits the banks.

Robinhood stepped in and took the bullet to prevent a full scale financial collapse. These fools on WSB are trying to engineer a complete financial meltdown under the guise of let's get the share price to $1000.

We came right to the edge of everything blowing up. Lord knows how many people would have suffered if it happened.

Congress needs to act to prevent this from ever happening again.

How many lives have these banks destroyed? Radical change requires sacrifice
 

GetRichOrDieTryin

Superstar
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
8,166
Reputation
1,490
Daps
25,018
How do you guys find this information besides the obvious way of just researching consistently?

Any apps or sources I should use to consistently feed me info?
 

old pig

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Nov 12, 2017
Messages
105,153
Reputation
20,286
Daps
437,709


I just did some reading around and seen that etrade also restricted purchases of AMC/GME...fidelity held strong tho...signing up with them now...I’m just not too crazy about their 2FA...I’m used to authy or authenticator...fidelity uses some app from symantec that has some shytty ratings
 
Last edited:

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,216
Reputation
3,914
Daps
70,005
Reppin
Michigan
fukk these hedge funds. blame them for shorting a stock over 100%
buying more GME on monday

keep defending robinhood outchea:mjlol:. Why would you only allow selling, stop it all together
Because if you sell the cash from the transaction doesn't have the collateral requirment. Buying requires the T+2 collateral requirment. The collateral requirment is usually 1-3% or something small. As these stocks became more volatile the collateral requirment the clearing houses had to put up skyrocketed from 1-3% to 100% of the transaction price. The central clearing house did that not Robinhood. Robinhood does their own clearing and they didn't have the cash to meet the 100% requirement on said stocks so they had to stop the buying. You aren't supposed to sell a non-settled stock so when you sell the cash you get is already settled.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,216
Reputation
3,914
Daps
70,005
Reppin
Michigan
When you sell a stock you can't withdraw the funds until the transaction settles. It's a balance on a screen until T+2 days. When you buy that's new money and it has a deposit requirment the clearing house has to put up for T+2 days.

Think of it like the opposite of eBay. On eBay the seller pays the fees. In this case the transaction requirements are on the buyer side.

Since nobody on Robinhood could buy GME they didn't have to put up any collateral for purchasing transactions. Thus they could stay in business.

The real question that you should be asking is why the central clearing house raised the collateral requirment to 100% of the purchasing transaction amount.

With all the volatility and volume it's unreasonable for most brokers and clearing houses to front 100% of the cash for T+2 days every day on all those transactions when normally it's a fraction of that. Eventually it will suck up all their free cash sticking it in limbo until settlement.
 
Top